Cargando…

Evaluation of red flags minimizes missing serious diseases in primary care

Primary care physicians encounter a broad range of problems and therefore require a broad knowledge to manage patients. They encounter patients at early undifferentiated stage of a disease and most of the presentations are due to non sinister problems but in minority of patients same presentations c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramanayake, R. P. J. C., Basnayake, B. M. T. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30090770
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_510_15
_version_ 1783342109548347392
author Ramanayake, R. P. J. C.
Basnayake, B. M. T. K.
author_facet Ramanayake, R. P. J. C.
Basnayake, B. M. T. K.
author_sort Ramanayake, R. P. J. C.
collection PubMed
description Primary care physicians encounter a broad range of problems and therefore require a broad knowledge to manage patients. They encounter patients at early undifferentiated stage of a disease and most of the presentations are due to non sinister problems but in minority of patients same presentations could be due to serious conditions. One of the main tasks of a primary care doctor is to marginalize the risk of missing these serious illnesses. To achieve this they can look for red flags which are clinical indicators of possible serious underlying condition. Red flags are signs and symptoms found in the patient's history and clinical examination. Evaluation of red flags is of paramount important as decision making is mainly dependent on history and examination with the availability of minimal investigatory facilities at primary care level. Some Red flags like loss of weight and loss of appetite are general in nature and could be due to many pathologies while hematemesis and melena are specific red flags which indicate GIT bleeding. All red flags, whether highly diagnostic or not, general or specific, warn us the possibility of life-threatening disorders. The term ‘red flag’ was originally associated with back pain and now lists of red flags are available for other common presentations such as headache, red eye and dyspepsia as well. Identification of red flags warrant investigations and or referral and is an integral part of primary care and of immense value to primary care doctors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6060920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60609202018-08-08 Evaluation of red flags minimizes missing serious diseases in primary care Ramanayake, R. P. J. C. Basnayake, B. M. T. K. J Family Med Prim Care Review Article Primary care physicians encounter a broad range of problems and therefore require a broad knowledge to manage patients. They encounter patients at early undifferentiated stage of a disease and most of the presentations are due to non sinister problems but in minority of patients same presentations could be due to serious conditions. One of the main tasks of a primary care doctor is to marginalize the risk of missing these serious illnesses. To achieve this they can look for red flags which are clinical indicators of possible serious underlying condition. Red flags are signs and symptoms found in the patient's history and clinical examination. Evaluation of red flags is of paramount important as decision making is mainly dependent on history and examination with the availability of minimal investigatory facilities at primary care level. Some Red flags like loss of weight and loss of appetite are general in nature and could be due to many pathologies while hematemesis and melena are specific red flags which indicate GIT bleeding. All red flags, whether highly diagnostic or not, general or specific, warn us the possibility of life-threatening disorders. The term ‘red flag’ was originally associated with back pain and now lists of red flags are available for other common presentations such as headache, red eye and dyspepsia as well. Identification of red flags warrant investigations and or referral and is an integral part of primary care and of immense value to primary care doctors. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6060920/ /pubmed/30090770 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_510_15 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Ramanayake, R. P. J. C.
Basnayake, B. M. T. K.
Evaluation of red flags minimizes missing serious diseases in primary care
title Evaluation of red flags minimizes missing serious diseases in primary care
title_full Evaluation of red flags minimizes missing serious diseases in primary care
title_fullStr Evaluation of red flags minimizes missing serious diseases in primary care
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of red flags minimizes missing serious diseases in primary care
title_short Evaluation of red flags minimizes missing serious diseases in primary care
title_sort evaluation of red flags minimizes missing serious diseases in primary care
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30090770
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_510_15
work_keys_str_mv AT ramanayakerpjc evaluationofredflagsminimizesmissingseriousdiseasesinprimarycare
AT basnayakebmtk evaluationofredflagsminimizesmissingseriousdiseasesinprimarycare