Cargando…
The contribution of forward masking to saccadic inhibition of return
ABSTRACT: Inhibition of return is the name typically given to the prolonged latency of motor responses directed to a previously cued target location. There is intense debate about the origins of this effect and its function, but most take for granted (despite lack of evidence) that it depends little...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29520712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1490-2 |
_version_ | 1783342124020793344 |
---|---|
author | Souto, David Born, Sabine Kerzel, Dirk |
author_facet | Souto, David Born, Sabine Kerzel, Dirk |
author_sort | Souto, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: Inhibition of return is the name typically given to the prolonged latency of motor responses directed to a previously cued target location. There is intense debate about the origins of this effect and its function, but most take for granted (despite lack of evidence) that it depends little on forward masking. Therefore, we re-examined the role of forward masking in inhibition of return. Forward masking was indexed by slower saccadic reaction times (SRTs) when the target orientation repeated the cue orientation at the same location. We confirmed effects of orientation repetition in the absence of an attentional bias when cues were presented on both sides of fixation (bilateral presentation). The effect of orientation repetition was reduced with high target contrast, consistent with a low-level origin such as contrast gain control in early visual areas. When presenting cues on only one side of fixation (unilateral presentation), we obtained inhibition of return with longer cue-target intervals and facilitation with targets presented shortly after the cue. The effect of orientation repetition was reduced when facilitation was observed, but was as strong as with bilateral cues when inhibition of return was observed. Therefore, forward masking may contribute to the inhibition of return effect by delaying reaction times to repeated features at the same location, but is not a principal cause of inhibition of return; in agreement with previous views. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The saccadic inhibition of return effect is a reaction-time cost when responding to a pre-cued location. Additional object updating costs are typically invoked to explain reaction-time costs observed when cue and target have the same shape. Yet, lower-level, forward masking of the target by the cue can not be ruled out. Importantly, we show an effect of orientation repetition that is consistent with low-level forward masking rather than object updating costs and that does not interact with inhibition of return. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6060982 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60609822018-08-09 The contribution of forward masking to saccadic inhibition of return Souto, David Born, Sabine Kerzel, Dirk Atten Percept Psychophys Article ABSTRACT: Inhibition of return is the name typically given to the prolonged latency of motor responses directed to a previously cued target location. There is intense debate about the origins of this effect and its function, but most take for granted (despite lack of evidence) that it depends little on forward masking. Therefore, we re-examined the role of forward masking in inhibition of return. Forward masking was indexed by slower saccadic reaction times (SRTs) when the target orientation repeated the cue orientation at the same location. We confirmed effects of orientation repetition in the absence of an attentional bias when cues were presented on both sides of fixation (bilateral presentation). The effect of orientation repetition was reduced with high target contrast, consistent with a low-level origin such as contrast gain control in early visual areas. When presenting cues on only one side of fixation (unilateral presentation), we obtained inhibition of return with longer cue-target intervals and facilitation with targets presented shortly after the cue. The effect of orientation repetition was reduced when facilitation was observed, but was as strong as with bilateral cues when inhibition of return was observed. Therefore, forward masking may contribute to the inhibition of return effect by delaying reaction times to repeated features at the same location, but is not a principal cause of inhibition of return; in agreement with previous views. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The saccadic inhibition of return effect is a reaction-time cost when responding to a pre-cued location. Additional object updating costs are typically invoked to explain reaction-time costs observed when cue and target have the same shape. Yet, lower-level, forward masking of the target by the cue can not be ruled out. Importantly, we show an effect of orientation repetition that is consistent with low-level forward masking rather than object updating costs and that does not interact with inhibition of return. Springer US 2018-03-08 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6060982/ /pubmed/29520712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1490-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Souto, David Born, Sabine Kerzel, Dirk The contribution of forward masking to saccadic inhibition of return |
title | The contribution of forward masking to saccadic inhibition of return |
title_full | The contribution of forward masking to saccadic inhibition of return |
title_fullStr | The contribution of forward masking to saccadic inhibition of return |
title_full_unstemmed | The contribution of forward masking to saccadic inhibition of return |
title_short | The contribution of forward masking to saccadic inhibition of return |
title_sort | contribution of forward masking to saccadic inhibition of return |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29520712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1490-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soutodavid thecontributionofforwardmaskingtosaccadicinhibitionofreturn AT bornsabine thecontributionofforwardmaskingtosaccadicinhibitionofreturn AT kerzeldirk thecontributionofforwardmaskingtosaccadicinhibitionofreturn AT soutodavid contributionofforwardmaskingtosaccadicinhibitionofreturn AT bornsabine contributionofforwardmaskingtosaccadicinhibitionofreturn AT kerzeldirk contributionofforwardmaskingtosaccadicinhibitionofreturn |