Cargando…

The contribution of forward masking to saccadic inhibition of return

ABSTRACT: Inhibition of return is the name typically given to the prolonged latency of motor responses directed to a previously cued target location. There is intense debate about the origins of this effect and its function, but most take for granted (despite lack of evidence) that it depends little...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Souto, David, Born, Sabine, Kerzel, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29520712
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1490-2
_version_ 1783342124020793344
author Souto, David
Born, Sabine
Kerzel, Dirk
author_facet Souto, David
Born, Sabine
Kerzel, Dirk
author_sort Souto, David
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: Inhibition of return is the name typically given to the prolonged latency of motor responses directed to a previously cued target location. There is intense debate about the origins of this effect and its function, but most take for granted (despite lack of evidence) that it depends little on forward masking. Therefore, we re-examined the role of forward masking in inhibition of return. Forward masking was indexed by slower saccadic reaction times (SRTs) when the target orientation repeated the cue orientation at the same location. We confirmed effects of orientation repetition in the absence of an attentional bias when cues were presented on both sides of fixation (bilateral presentation). The effect of orientation repetition was reduced with high target contrast, consistent with a low-level origin such as contrast gain control in early visual areas. When presenting cues on only one side of fixation (unilateral presentation), we obtained inhibition of return with longer cue-target intervals and facilitation with targets presented shortly after the cue. The effect of orientation repetition was reduced when facilitation was observed, but was as strong as with bilateral cues when inhibition of return was observed. Therefore, forward masking may contribute to the inhibition of return effect by delaying reaction times to repeated features at the same location, but is not a principal cause of inhibition of return; in agreement with previous views. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The saccadic inhibition of return effect is a reaction-time cost when responding to a pre-cued location. Additional object updating costs are typically invoked to explain reaction-time costs observed when cue and target have the same shape. Yet, lower-level, forward masking of the target by the cue can not be ruled out. Importantly, we show an effect of orientation repetition that is consistent with low-level forward masking rather than object updating costs and that does not interact with inhibition of return.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6060982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60609822018-08-09 The contribution of forward masking to saccadic inhibition of return Souto, David Born, Sabine Kerzel, Dirk Atten Percept Psychophys Article ABSTRACT: Inhibition of return is the name typically given to the prolonged latency of motor responses directed to a previously cued target location. There is intense debate about the origins of this effect and its function, but most take for granted (despite lack of evidence) that it depends little on forward masking. Therefore, we re-examined the role of forward masking in inhibition of return. Forward masking was indexed by slower saccadic reaction times (SRTs) when the target orientation repeated the cue orientation at the same location. We confirmed effects of orientation repetition in the absence of an attentional bias when cues were presented on both sides of fixation (bilateral presentation). The effect of orientation repetition was reduced with high target contrast, consistent with a low-level origin such as contrast gain control in early visual areas. When presenting cues on only one side of fixation (unilateral presentation), we obtained inhibition of return with longer cue-target intervals and facilitation with targets presented shortly after the cue. The effect of orientation repetition was reduced when facilitation was observed, but was as strong as with bilateral cues when inhibition of return was observed. Therefore, forward masking may contribute to the inhibition of return effect by delaying reaction times to repeated features at the same location, but is not a principal cause of inhibition of return; in agreement with previous views. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The saccadic inhibition of return effect is a reaction-time cost when responding to a pre-cued location. Additional object updating costs are typically invoked to explain reaction-time costs observed when cue and target have the same shape. Yet, lower-level, forward masking of the target by the cue can not be ruled out. Importantly, we show an effect of orientation repetition that is consistent with low-level forward masking rather than object updating costs and that does not interact with inhibition of return. Springer US 2018-03-08 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6060982/ /pubmed/29520712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1490-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Souto, David
Born, Sabine
Kerzel, Dirk
The contribution of forward masking to saccadic inhibition of return
title The contribution of forward masking to saccadic inhibition of return
title_full The contribution of forward masking to saccadic inhibition of return
title_fullStr The contribution of forward masking to saccadic inhibition of return
title_full_unstemmed The contribution of forward masking to saccadic inhibition of return
title_short The contribution of forward masking to saccadic inhibition of return
title_sort contribution of forward masking to saccadic inhibition of return
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29520712
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1490-2
work_keys_str_mv AT soutodavid thecontributionofforwardmaskingtosaccadicinhibitionofreturn
AT bornsabine thecontributionofforwardmaskingtosaccadicinhibitionofreturn
AT kerzeldirk thecontributionofforwardmaskingtosaccadicinhibitionofreturn
AT soutodavid contributionofforwardmaskingtosaccadicinhibitionofreturn
AT bornsabine contributionofforwardmaskingtosaccadicinhibitionofreturn
AT kerzeldirk contributionofforwardmaskingtosaccadicinhibitionofreturn