Cargando…

Effects of stimulus response compatibility on covert imitation of vowels

When we observe someone else speaking, we tend to automatically activate the corresponding speech motor patterns. When listening, we therefore covertly imitate the observed speech. Simulation theories of speech perception propose that covert imitation of speech motor patterns supports speech percept...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adank, Patti, Nuttall, Helen, Bekkering, Harold, Maegherman, Gwijde
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29536418
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1501-3
_version_ 1783342124260917248
author Adank, Patti
Nuttall, Helen
Bekkering, Harold
Maegherman, Gwijde
author_facet Adank, Patti
Nuttall, Helen
Bekkering, Harold
Maegherman, Gwijde
author_sort Adank, Patti
collection PubMed
description When we observe someone else speaking, we tend to automatically activate the corresponding speech motor patterns. When listening, we therefore covertly imitate the observed speech. Simulation theories of speech perception propose that covert imitation of speech motor patterns supports speech perception. Covert imitation of speech has been studied with interference paradigms, including the stimulus–response compatibility paradigm (SRC). The SRC paradigm measures covert imitation by comparing articulation of a prompt following exposure to a distracter. Responses tend to be faster for congruent than for incongruent distracters; thus, showing evidence of covert imitation. Simulation accounts propose a key role for covert imitation in speech perception. However, covert imitation has thus far only been demonstrated for a select class of speech sounds, namely consonants, and it is unclear whether covert imitation extends to vowels. We aimed to demonstrate that covert imitation effects as measured with the SRC paradigm extend to vowels, in two experiments. We examined whether covert imitation occurs for vowels in a consonant–vowel–consonant context in visual, audio, and audiovisual modalities. We presented the prompt at four time points to examine how covert imitation varied over the distracter’s duration. The results of both experiments clearly demonstrated covert imitation effects for vowels, thus supporting simulation theories of speech perception. Covert imitation was not affected by stimulus modality and was maximal for later time points. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13414-018-1501-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6060983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60609832018-08-09 Effects of stimulus response compatibility on covert imitation of vowels Adank, Patti Nuttall, Helen Bekkering, Harold Maegherman, Gwijde Atten Percept Psychophys Article When we observe someone else speaking, we tend to automatically activate the corresponding speech motor patterns. When listening, we therefore covertly imitate the observed speech. Simulation theories of speech perception propose that covert imitation of speech motor patterns supports speech perception. Covert imitation of speech has been studied with interference paradigms, including the stimulus–response compatibility paradigm (SRC). The SRC paradigm measures covert imitation by comparing articulation of a prompt following exposure to a distracter. Responses tend to be faster for congruent than for incongruent distracters; thus, showing evidence of covert imitation. Simulation accounts propose a key role for covert imitation in speech perception. However, covert imitation has thus far only been demonstrated for a select class of speech sounds, namely consonants, and it is unclear whether covert imitation extends to vowels. We aimed to demonstrate that covert imitation effects as measured with the SRC paradigm extend to vowels, in two experiments. We examined whether covert imitation occurs for vowels in a consonant–vowel–consonant context in visual, audio, and audiovisual modalities. We presented the prompt at four time points to examine how covert imitation varied over the distracter’s duration. The results of both experiments clearly demonstrated covert imitation effects for vowels, thus supporting simulation theories of speech perception. Covert imitation was not affected by stimulus modality and was maximal for later time points. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13414-018-1501-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2018-03-13 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6060983/ /pubmed/29536418 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1501-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Adank, Patti
Nuttall, Helen
Bekkering, Harold
Maegherman, Gwijde
Effects of stimulus response compatibility on covert imitation of vowels
title Effects of stimulus response compatibility on covert imitation of vowels
title_full Effects of stimulus response compatibility on covert imitation of vowels
title_fullStr Effects of stimulus response compatibility on covert imitation of vowels
title_full_unstemmed Effects of stimulus response compatibility on covert imitation of vowels
title_short Effects of stimulus response compatibility on covert imitation of vowels
title_sort effects of stimulus response compatibility on covert imitation of vowels
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6060983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29536418
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1501-3
work_keys_str_mv AT adankpatti effectsofstimulusresponsecompatibilityoncovertimitationofvowels
AT nuttallhelen effectsofstimulusresponsecompatibilityoncovertimitationofvowels
AT bekkeringharold effectsofstimulusresponsecompatibilityoncovertimitationofvowels
AT maeghermangwijde effectsofstimulusresponsecompatibilityoncovertimitationofvowels