Cargando…
Effect of premedication on lesion detection rate and visualization of the mucosa during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a multicenter large sample randomized controlled double-blind study
BACKGROUND: Premedication in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for higher lesions detection rate has not been well studied so far. This study aimed to confirm whether premedication could improve the detection rate of early cancer or precancerous lesions and mucosal visibility. METHOD: From July 2015...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6061056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29572630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6077-4 |
_version_ | 1783342140487630848 |
---|---|
author | Liu, X. Guan, C. T. Xue, L. Y. He, S. Zhang, Y. M. Zhao, D. L. Li, Y. Liu, F. G. Li, J. Liu, Y. F. Ling, A. S. Wei, W. Q. Wang, G. Q. |
author_facet | Liu, X. Guan, C. T. Xue, L. Y. He, S. Zhang, Y. M. Zhao, D. L. Li, Y. Liu, F. G. Li, J. Liu, Y. F. Ling, A. S. Wei, W. Q. Wang, G. Q. |
author_sort | Liu, X. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Premedication in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for higher lesions detection rate has not been well studied so far. This study aimed to confirm whether premedication could improve the detection rate of early cancer or precancerous lesions and mucosal visibility. METHOD: From July 2015 to December 2015, 7200 participants from 6 centers were screened by endoscopy with one of the 4 following premedications randomly: (1) water (group D); (2) pronase (group A); (3) simethicone (group B); (4) pronase and simethicone (group C). Early cancer and precancerous lesions detection rates were taken as the primary endpoints, and mucosal visibility was taken as the secondary endpoint. They were compared among four groups to determine different premedication effects in terms of different anatomical sites. Trial was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; the registration number is ChiCTR-IOR-17010985. RESULTS: The upper gastrointestinal overall precancerous lesion detection rates among four groups were 8.7, 8.4, 10.0, and 10.3%, the overall early cancer detection rates were 1.3, 1.4%, 1.5, and 1.6%, both without significant difference (p = 0.138 and 0.878). However, the visibility score distributions between control group (D) and premedication groups (A, B, and C) were all statistically significant, with all anatomical sites p values < 0.001. Subgroup analyses, from 2 centers without screening before, also showed significant difference in esophageal (3.9, 3.3, 4.5, and 8.4% with p = 0.004) and overall (7.0, 5.5, 7.3, and 12.0% with p = 0.004) precancerous lesion detection rate. CONCLUSIONS: Premedication with pronase and simethicone may not increase lesion detection rates but could significantly increase the upper gastrointestinal mucosal visibility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6061056 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60610562018-08-09 Effect of premedication on lesion detection rate and visualization of the mucosa during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a multicenter large sample randomized controlled double-blind study Liu, X. Guan, C. T. Xue, L. Y. He, S. Zhang, Y. M. Zhao, D. L. Li, Y. Liu, F. G. Li, J. Liu, Y. F. Ling, A. S. Wei, W. Q. Wang, G. Q. Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Premedication in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for higher lesions detection rate has not been well studied so far. This study aimed to confirm whether premedication could improve the detection rate of early cancer or precancerous lesions and mucosal visibility. METHOD: From July 2015 to December 2015, 7200 participants from 6 centers were screened by endoscopy with one of the 4 following premedications randomly: (1) water (group D); (2) pronase (group A); (3) simethicone (group B); (4) pronase and simethicone (group C). Early cancer and precancerous lesions detection rates were taken as the primary endpoints, and mucosal visibility was taken as the secondary endpoint. They were compared among four groups to determine different premedication effects in terms of different anatomical sites. Trial was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; the registration number is ChiCTR-IOR-17010985. RESULTS: The upper gastrointestinal overall precancerous lesion detection rates among four groups were 8.7, 8.4, 10.0, and 10.3%, the overall early cancer detection rates were 1.3, 1.4%, 1.5, and 1.6%, both without significant difference (p = 0.138 and 0.878). However, the visibility score distributions between control group (D) and premedication groups (A, B, and C) were all statistically significant, with all anatomical sites p values < 0.001. Subgroup analyses, from 2 centers without screening before, also showed significant difference in esophageal (3.9, 3.3, 4.5, and 8.4% with p = 0.004) and overall (7.0, 5.5, 7.3, and 12.0% with p = 0.004) precancerous lesion detection rate. CONCLUSIONS: Premedication with pronase and simethicone may not increase lesion detection rates but could significantly increase the upper gastrointestinal mucosal visibility. Springer US 2018-03-23 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6061056/ /pubmed/29572630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6077-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Liu, X. Guan, C. T. Xue, L. Y. He, S. Zhang, Y. M. Zhao, D. L. Li, Y. Liu, F. G. Li, J. Liu, Y. F. Ling, A. S. Wei, W. Q. Wang, G. Q. Effect of premedication on lesion detection rate and visualization of the mucosa during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a multicenter large sample randomized controlled double-blind study |
title | Effect of premedication on lesion detection rate and visualization of the mucosa during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a multicenter large sample randomized controlled double-blind study |
title_full | Effect of premedication on lesion detection rate and visualization of the mucosa during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a multicenter large sample randomized controlled double-blind study |
title_fullStr | Effect of premedication on lesion detection rate and visualization of the mucosa during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a multicenter large sample randomized controlled double-blind study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of premedication on lesion detection rate and visualization of the mucosa during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a multicenter large sample randomized controlled double-blind study |
title_short | Effect of premedication on lesion detection rate and visualization of the mucosa during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a multicenter large sample randomized controlled double-blind study |
title_sort | effect of premedication on lesion detection rate and visualization of the mucosa during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a multicenter large sample randomized controlled double-blind study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6061056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29572630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6077-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liux effectofpremedicationonlesiondetectionrateandvisualizationofthemucosaduringuppergastrointestinalendoscopyamulticenterlargesamplerandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindstudy AT guanct effectofpremedicationonlesiondetectionrateandvisualizationofthemucosaduringuppergastrointestinalendoscopyamulticenterlargesamplerandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindstudy AT xuely effectofpremedicationonlesiondetectionrateandvisualizationofthemucosaduringuppergastrointestinalendoscopyamulticenterlargesamplerandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindstudy AT hes effectofpremedicationonlesiondetectionrateandvisualizationofthemucosaduringuppergastrointestinalendoscopyamulticenterlargesamplerandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindstudy AT zhangym effectofpremedicationonlesiondetectionrateandvisualizationofthemucosaduringuppergastrointestinalendoscopyamulticenterlargesamplerandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindstudy AT zhaodl effectofpremedicationonlesiondetectionrateandvisualizationofthemucosaduringuppergastrointestinalendoscopyamulticenterlargesamplerandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindstudy AT liy effectofpremedicationonlesiondetectionrateandvisualizationofthemucosaduringuppergastrointestinalendoscopyamulticenterlargesamplerandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindstudy AT liufg effectofpremedicationonlesiondetectionrateandvisualizationofthemucosaduringuppergastrointestinalendoscopyamulticenterlargesamplerandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindstudy AT lij effectofpremedicationonlesiondetectionrateandvisualizationofthemucosaduringuppergastrointestinalendoscopyamulticenterlargesamplerandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindstudy AT liuyf effectofpremedicationonlesiondetectionrateandvisualizationofthemucosaduringuppergastrointestinalendoscopyamulticenterlargesamplerandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindstudy AT lingas effectofpremedicationonlesiondetectionrateandvisualizationofthemucosaduringuppergastrointestinalendoscopyamulticenterlargesamplerandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindstudy AT weiwq effectofpremedicationonlesiondetectionrateandvisualizationofthemucosaduringuppergastrointestinalendoscopyamulticenterlargesamplerandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindstudy AT wanggq effectofpremedicationonlesiondetectionrateandvisualizationofthemucosaduringuppergastrointestinalendoscopyamulticenterlargesamplerandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindstudy |