Cargando…

Peripheral Blood Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor as a Biomarker of Alzheimer’s Disease: Are There Methodological Biases?

Mounting evidence that alterations in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels and signaling may be involved in the etiopathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has suggested that its blood levels could be used as a biomarker of the disease. However, higher, lower, or unchanged circulating BD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balietti, Marta, Giuli, Cinzia, Conti, Fiorenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6061178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29330839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12035-017-0866-y
_version_ 1783342168612536320
author Balietti, Marta
Giuli, Cinzia
Conti, Fiorenzo
author_facet Balietti, Marta
Giuli, Cinzia
Conti, Fiorenzo
author_sort Balietti, Marta
collection PubMed
description Mounting evidence that alterations in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels and signaling may be involved in the etiopathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has suggested that its blood levels could be used as a biomarker of the disease. However, higher, lower, or unchanged circulating BDNF levels have all been described in AD patients compared to healthy controls. Although the reasons for such different findings are unclear, methodological issues are likely to be involved. The heterogeneity of participant recruitment criteria and the lack of control of variables that influence circulating BDNF levels regardless of dementia (depressive symptoms, medications, lifestyle, lack of overlap between serum and plasma, and experimental aspects) are likely to bias result and prevent study comparability. The present work reviews a broad panel of factors, whose close control could help reduce the inconsistency of study findings, and offers practical advice on their management. Research directed at elucidating the weight of each of these variables and at standardizing analytical methodologies is urgently needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6061178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60611782018-08-09 Peripheral Blood Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor as a Biomarker of Alzheimer’s Disease: Are There Methodological Biases? Balietti, Marta Giuli, Cinzia Conti, Fiorenzo Mol Neurobiol Article Mounting evidence that alterations in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels and signaling may be involved in the etiopathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has suggested that its blood levels could be used as a biomarker of the disease. However, higher, lower, or unchanged circulating BDNF levels have all been described in AD patients compared to healthy controls. Although the reasons for such different findings are unclear, methodological issues are likely to be involved. The heterogeneity of participant recruitment criteria and the lack of control of variables that influence circulating BDNF levels regardless of dementia (depressive symptoms, medications, lifestyle, lack of overlap between serum and plasma, and experimental aspects) are likely to bias result and prevent study comparability. The present work reviews a broad panel of factors, whose close control could help reduce the inconsistency of study findings, and offers practical advice on their management. Research directed at elucidating the weight of each of these variables and at standardizing analytical methodologies is urgently needed. Springer US 2018-01-13 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6061178/ /pubmed/29330839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12035-017-0866-y Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Balietti, Marta
Giuli, Cinzia
Conti, Fiorenzo
Peripheral Blood Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor as a Biomarker of Alzheimer’s Disease: Are There Methodological Biases?
title Peripheral Blood Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor as a Biomarker of Alzheimer’s Disease: Are There Methodological Biases?
title_full Peripheral Blood Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor as a Biomarker of Alzheimer’s Disease: Are There Methodological Biases?
title_fullStr Peripheral Blood Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor as a Biomarker of Alzheimer’s Disease: Are There Methodological Biases?
title_full_unstemmed Peripheral Blood Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor as a Biomarker of Alzheimer’s Disease: Are There Methodological Biases?
title_short Peripheral Blood Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor as a Biomarker of Alzheimer’s Disease: Are There Methodological Biases?
title_sort peripheral blood brain-derived neurotrophic factor as a biomarker of alzheimer’s disease: are there methodological biases?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6061178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29330839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12035-017-0866-y
work_keys_str_mv AT baliettimarta peripheralbloodbrainderivedneurotrophicfactorasabiomarkerofalzheimersdiseasearetheremethodologicalbiases
AT giulicinzia peripheralbloodbrainderivedneurotrophicfactorasabiomarkerofalzheimersdiseasearetheremethodologicalbiases
AT contifiorenzo peripheralbloodbrainderivedneurotrophicfactorasabiomarkerofalzheimersdiseasearetheremethodologicalbiases