Cargando…
Peripheral Blood Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor as a Biomarker of Alzheimer’s Disease: Are There Methodological Biases?
Mounting evidence that alterations in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels and signaling may be involved in the etiopathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has suggested that its blood levels could be used as a biomarker of the disease. However, higher, lower, or unchanged circulating BD...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6061178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29330839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12035-017-0866-y |
_version_ | 1783342168612536320 |
---|---|
author | Balietti, Marta Giuli, Cinzia Conti, Fiorenzo |
author_facet | Balietti, Marta Giuli, Cinzia Conti, Fiorenzo |
author_sort | Balietti, Marta |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mounting evidence that alterations in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels and signaling may be involved in the etiopathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has suggested that its blood levels could be used as a biomarker of the disease. However, higher, lower, or unchanged circulating BDNF levels have all been described in AD patients compared to healthy controls. Although the reasons for such different findings are unclear, methodological issues are likely to be involved. The heterogeneity of participant recruitment criteria and the lack of control of variables that influence circulating BDNF levels regardless of dementia (depressive symptoms, medications, lifestyle, lack of overlap between serum and plasma, and experimental aspects) are likely to bias result and prevent study comparability. The present work reviews a broad panel of factors, whose close control could help reduce the inconsistency of study findings, and offers practical advice on their management. Research directed at elucidating the weight of each of these variables and at standardizing analytical methodologies is urgently needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6061178 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60611782018-08-09 Peripheral Blood Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor as a Biomarker of Alzheimer’s Disease: Are There Methodological Biases? Balietti, Marta Giuli, Cinzia Conti, Fiorenzo Mol Neurobiol Article Mounting evidence that alterations in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels and signaling may be involved in the etiopathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has suggested that its blood levels could be used as a biomarker of the disease. However, higher, lower, or unchanged circulating BDNF levels have all been described in AD patients compared to healthy controls. Although the reasons for such different findings are unclear, methodological issues are likely to be involved. The heterogeneity of participant recruitment criteria and the lack of control of variables that influence circulating BDNF levels regardless of dementia (depressive symptoms, medications, lifestyle, lack of overlap between serum and plasma, and experimental aspects) are likely to bias result and prevent study comparability. The present work reviews a broad panel of factors, whose close control could help reduce the inconsistency of study findings, and offers practical advice on their management. Research directed at elucidating the weight of each of these variables and at standardizing analytical methodologies is urgently needed. Springer US 2018-01-13 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6061178/ /pubmed/29330839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12035-017-0866-y Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Balietti, Marta Giuli, Cinzia Conti, Fiorenzo Peripheral Blood Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor as a Biomarker of Alzheimer’s Disease: Are There Methodological Biases? |
title | Peripheral Blood Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor as a Biomarker of Alzheimer’s Disease: Are There Methodological Biases? |
title_full | Peripheral Blood Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor as a Biomarker of Alzheimer’s Disease: Are There Methodological Biases? |
title_fullStr | Peripheral Blood Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor as a Biomarker of Alzheimer’s Disease: Are There Methodological Biases? |
title_full_unstemmed | Peripheral Blood Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor as a Biomarker of Alzheimer’s Disease: Are There Methodological Biases? |
title_short | Peripheral Blood Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor as a Biomarker of Alzheimer’s Disease: Are There Methodological Biases? |
title_sort | peripheral blood brain-derived neurotrophic factor as a biomarker of alzheimer’s disease: are there methodological biases? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6061178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29330839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12035-017-0866-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baliettimarta peripheralbloodbrainderivedneurotrophicfactorasabiomarkerofalzheimersdiseasearetheremethodologicalbiases AT giulicinzia peripheralbloodbrainderivedneurotrophicfactorasabiomarkerofalzheimersdiseasearetheremethodologicalbiases AT contifiorenzo peripheralbloodbrainderivedneurotrophicfactorasabiomarkerofalzheimersdiseasearetheremethodologicalbiases |