Cargando…

Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy vs single-agent therapy in recurrent glioblastoma: evidence from randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Recent studies showed inconsistent results of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy vs single-agent therapy in terms of their safety and efficacy for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to explore the value of bevacizumab combined with chemot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Zhouqing, Xu, Na, Zhao, Chongshun, Xue, Tao, Wu, Xin, Wang, Zhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6061394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087578
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S173323
_version_ 1783342215695695872
author Chen, Zhouqing
Xu, Na
Zhao, Chongshun
Xue, Tao
Wu, Xin
Wang, Zhong
author_facet Chen, Zhouqing
Xu, Na
Zhao, Chongshun
Xue, Tao
Wu, Xin
Wang, Zhong
author_sort Chen, Zhouqing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent studies showed inconsistent results of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy vs single-agent therapy in terms of their safety and efficacy for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to explore the value of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy and single-agent therapy in recurrent glioblastoma treatment. METHODS: Databases such as MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the topic of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy and single-agent therapy as treatments for recurrent glioblastoma from January 1980 to April 2018. Subsequent articles were then sorted, evaluated, and analyzed. RESULTS: We pooled 1,169 patient cases from seven RCTs. Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy showed a significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=0.65; 95% CI 0.57–0.74; P<0.001) compared to single-agent therapy. In addition, the overall survival (OS) rate showed insignificant differences between the two groups (HR=0.96; 95% CI 0.83–1.12; P=0.622). Simultaneously, we found that bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy had a higher objective response rate (ORR) (OR=2.10; 95% CI 1.32–3.33; P=0.002), but also higher incidence of adverse events (AEs) (OR=1.85; 95% CI 1.26–2.71; P=0.002). However, in subgroup analysis, we found that AEs showed insignificant differences between the two treatment methods when bevacizumab was used as the single-agent therapy subgroup (P=0.058). In addition, in the subgroup with low corticosteroid use rate at baseline (N<50%), ORR (P=0.108) and AEs (P=0.134) showed insignificant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy can significantly improve PFS and ORR, but did not prolong OS in these studies, and can even lead to higher odds of AEs. In addition, bevacizumab may play a dominant role and corticosteroid may be an unfavorable factor in the combination therapy of recurrent glioblastoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6061394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60613942018-08-07 Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy vs single-agent therapy in recurrent glioblastoma: evidence from randomized controlled trials Chen, Zhouqing Xu, Na Zhao, Chongshun Xue, Tao Wu, Xin Wang, Zhong Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Recent studies showed inconsistent results of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy vs single-agent therapy in terms of their safety and efficacy for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to explore the value of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy and single-agent therapy in recurrent glioblastoma treatment. METHODS: Databases such as MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the topic of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy and single-agent therapy as treatments for recurrent glioblastoma from January 1980 to April 2018. Subsequent articles were then sorted, evaluated, and analyzed. RESULTS: We pooled 1,169 patient cases from seven RCTs. Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy showed a significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=0.65; 95% CI 0.57–0.74; P<0.001) compared to single-agent therapy. In addition, the overall survival (OS) rate showed insignificant differences between the two groups (HR=0.96; 95% CI 0.83–1.12; P=0.622). Simultaneously, we found that bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy had a higher objective response rate (ORR) (OR=2.10; 95% CI 1.32–3.33; P=0.002), but also higher incidence of adverse events (AEs) (OR=1.85; 95% CI 1.26–2.71; P=0.002). However, in subgroup analysis, we found that AEs showed insignificant differences between the two treatment methods when bevacizumab was used as the single-agent therapy subgroup (P=0.058). In addition, in the subgroup with low corticosteroid use rate at baseline (N<50%), ORR (P=0.108) and AEs (P=0.134) showed insignificant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy can significantly improve PFS and ORR, but did not prolong OS in these studies, and can even lead to higher odds of AEs. In addition, bevacizumab may play a dominant role and corticosteroid may be an unfavorable factor in the combination therapy of recurrent glioblastoma. Dove Medical Press 2018-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6061394/ /pubmed/30087578 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S173323 Text en © 2018 Chen et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Chen, Zhouqing
Xu, Na
Zhao, Chongshun
Xue, Tao
Wu, Xin
Wang, Zhong
Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy vs single-agent therapy in recurrent glioblastoma: evidence from randomized controlled trials
title Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy vs single-agent therapy in recurrent glioblastoma: evidence from randomized controlled trials
title_full Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy vs single-agent therapy in recurrent glioblastoma: evidence from randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy vs single-agent therapy in recurrent glioblastoma: evidence from randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy vs single-agent therapy in recurrent glioblastoma: evidence from randomized controlled trials
title_short Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy vs single-agent therapy in recurrent glioblastoma: evidence from randomized controlled trials
title_sort bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy vs single-agent therapy in recurrent glioblastoma: evidence from randomized controlled trials
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6061394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087578
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S173323
work_keys_str_mv AT chenzhouqing bevacizumabcombinedwithchemotherapyvssingleagenttherapyinrecurrentglioblastomaevidencefromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xuna bevacizumabcombinedwithchemotherapyvssingleagenttherapyinrecurrentglioblastomaevidencefromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhaochongshun bevacizumabcombinedwithchemotherapyvssingleagenttherapyinrecurrentglioblastomaevidencefromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xuetao bevacizumabcombinedwithchemotherapyvssingleagenttherapyinrecurrentglioblastomaevidencefromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wuxin bevacizumabcombinedwithchemotherapyvssingleagenttherapyinrecurrentglioblastomaevidencefromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wangzhong bevacizumabcombinedwithchemotherapyvssingleagenttherapyinrecurrentglioblastomaevidencefromrandomizedcontrolledtrials