Cargando…
Efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Elderly Patients with COPD: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pooled analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) 62.5/25 µg dual bronchodilation versus placebo in elderly symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: We conducted a post hoc pooled analysis of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6061430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29951734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40266-018-0558-y |
_version_ | 1783342223660679168 |
---|---|
author | Ray, Riju Tombs, Lee Asmus, Michael J. Boucot, Isabelle Lipson, David A. Compton, Chris Naya, Ian |
author_facet | Ray, Riju Tombs, Lee Asmus, Michael J. Boucot, Isabelle Lipson, David A. Compton, Chris Naya, Ian |
author_sort | Ray, Riju |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pooled analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) 62.5/25 µg dual bronchodilation versus placebo in elderly symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: We conducted a post hoc pooled analysis of data from 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Change from baseline (CFB) in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)), proportion of FEV(1) responders (≥ 100-mL increase from baseline), and safety were analyzed in patients aged < 65, ≥ 65, and ≥ 75 years on Days 28, 56, and 84 (12-week analysis of parallel-group design studies), Days 28, 56, 84, 112, 140, 168, and 169 (24-week analysis of parallel-group design studies), and Days 2, 42, and 84 (12-week analysis of crossover design studies). RESULTS: The UMEC/VI intent-to-treat (ITT) populations comprised 2246, 1296, and 472 patients in the 12-week parallel-group, 24-week parallel-group, and 12-week crossover analysis, respectively (≥ 65 years: 36–44%; ≥ 75 years: 7–11%). The placebo ITT populations comprised 528, 280, and 505 patients, respectively (≥ 65 years: 37–41%; ≥ 75 years: 5–11%). Significant improvements in trough FEV(1) and significantly greater proportions of FEV(1) responders were seen with UMEC/VI compared with placebo in all analyses regardless of patient age or timepoint considered (p ≤ 0.023), except Day 84 trough FEV(1) CFB in the 12-week crossover analysis in patients aged ≥ 75 years (p = 0.064). UMEC/VI safety profile was similar to placebo in all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this pooled analysis of RCT data, once-daily UMEC/VI was well tolerated and provided clinically significant lung function benefits compared with placebo in younger and older patients with COPD. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline (study 208125). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40266-018-0558-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6061430 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60614302018-08-09 Efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Elderly Patients with COPD: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Ray, Riju Tombs, Lee Asmus, Michael J. Boucot, Isabelle Lipson, David A. Compton, Chris Naya, Ian Drugs Aging Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pooled analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) 62.5/25 µg dual bronchodilation versus placebo in elderly symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: We conducted a post hoc pooled analysis of data from 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Change from baseline (CFB) in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)), proportion of FEV(1) responders (≥ 100-mL increase from baseline), and safety were analyzed in patients aged < 65, ≥ 65, and ≥ 75 years on Days 28, 56, and 84 (12-week analysis of parallel-group design studies), Days 28, 56, 84, 112, 140, 168, and 169 (24-week analysis of parallel-group design studies), and Days 2, 42, and 84 (12-week analysis of crossover design studies). RESULTS: The UMEC/VI intent-to-treat (ITT) populations comprised 2246, 1296, and 472 patients in the 12-week parallel-group, 24-week parallel-group, and 12-week crossover analysis, respectively (≥ 65 years: 36–44%; ≥ 75 years: 7–11%). The placebo ITT populations comprised 528, 280, and 505 patients, respectively (≥ 65 years: 37–41%; ≥ 75 years: 5–11%). Significant improvements in trough FEV(1) and significantly greater proportions of FEV(1) responders were seen with UMEC/VI compared with placebo in all analyses regardless of patient age or timepoint considered (p ≤ 0.023), except Day 84 trough FEV(1) CFB in the 12-week crossover analysis in patients aged ≥ 75 years (p = 0.064). UMEC/VI safety profile was similar to placebo in all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this pooled analysis of RCT data, once-daily UMEC/VI was well tolerated and provided clinically significant lung function benefits compared with placebo in younger and older patients with COPD. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline (study 208125). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40266-018-0558-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-06-27 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6061430/ /pubmed/29951734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40266-018-0558-y Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Ray, Riju Tombs, Lee Asmus, Michael J. Boucot, Isabelle Lipson, David A. Compton, Chris Naya, Ian Efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Elderly Patients with COPD: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | Efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Elderly Patients with COPD: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | Efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Elderly Patients with COPD: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Elderly Patients with COPD: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Elderly Patients with COPD: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | Efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Elderly Patients with COPD: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol in elderly patients with copd: a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6061430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29951734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40266-018-0558-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rayriju efficacyofumeclidiniumvilanterolinelderlypatientswithcopdapooledanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT tombslee efficacyofumeclidiniumvilanterolinelderlypatientswithcopdapooledanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT asmusmichaelj efficacyofumeclidiniumvilanterolinelderlypatientswithcopdapooledanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT boucotisabelle efficacyofumeclidiniumvilanterolinelderlypatientswithcopdapooledanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT lipsondavida efficacyofumeclidiniumvilanterolinelderlypatientswithcopdapooledanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT comptonchris efficacyofumeclidiniumvilanterolinelderlypatientswithcopdapooledanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT nayaian efficacyofumeclidiniumvilanterolinelderlypatientswithcopdapooledanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |