Cargando…
Tardus parvus waveforms in Doppler ultrasonography for hepatic artery stenosis after liver transplantation: can a new cut-off value guide the next step?
PURPOSE: Considering the high false-positive diagnosis of the tardus parvus waveform (TPW) in Doppler ultrasonography (DUS) for hepatic artery stenosis (HAS) after liver transplantation (LT), this study aimed to determine clinical features and new cut-off values to help guide treatment. MATERIALS AN...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6061483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29063132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1358-2 |
_version_ | 1783342235823112192 |
---|---|
author | Zheng, Bo-wen Tan, Ying-yi Fu, Bin-sheng Tong, Ge Wu, Tao Wu, Li-li Meng, Xiao-chun Zheng, Rong-qin Yi, Shu-hong Ren, Jie |
author_facet | Zheng, Bo-wen Tan, Ying-yi Fu, Bin-sheng Tong, Ge Wu, Tao Wu, Li-li Meng, Xiao-chun Zheng, Rong-qin Yi, Shu-hong Ren, Jie |
author_sort | Zheng, Bo-wen |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Considering the high false-positive diagnosis of the tardus parvus waveform (TPW) in Doppler ultrasonography (DUS) for hepatic artery stenosis (HAS) after liver transplantation (LT), this study aimed to determine clinical features and new cut-off values to help guide treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by an Institutional Review Board. A total of 171 LT recipients were included and underwent DUS and either computed tomography angiography or digital subtraction angiography with an interval < 4 weeks at least 1 month post-LT. The DUS of 69 patients exhibited TPW [defined as resistive index (RI) < 0.5 and systolic acceleration time (SAT) > 0.08 s]. A multilevel likelihood ratio (LR) analysis was used to explore new cut-off values for DUS. In addition, abnormal liver function was considered additional evidence (defined as any liver enzyme > 3-fold of the upper limit of normal level or 2-fold increased). The results were stratified into three categories, category 1 (subjects with traditional TPW), category 2 (subjects with traditional TPW and abnormal liver function), and category 3 (subjects with traditional TPW and abnormal liver function, or with new cut-off values), and the diagnostic performance of each category was analyzed. RESULTS: The LR analysis revealed new cut-off values of RI < 0.4 (LR = 10.58) or SAT > 0.12 s (LR = 16.46). The false-positive rates for categories 2 and 3 were significantly lower (7.6% vs. 18.1%, P = 0.038; 1.9% vs. 18.1%, P < 0.001, respectively) than those for category 1, while the sensitivity for category 2 was significantly lower (41.8% vs. 74.6%, P < 0.001; 41.8% vs. 61.2%, P = 0.038, respectively) than that for categories 1 and 3. CONCLUSION: Using either (1) RI < 0.4 or SAT > 0.12 s, or (2) traditional TPW (RI < 0.5 and SAT > 0.08 s) in the presence of abnormal liver functions as the DUS criteria for HAS will significantly decrease the false-positive rate compared to traditional TPW without a significant increase in the false-negative rate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6061483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60614832018-08-09 Tardus parvus waveforms in Doppler ultrasonography for hepatic artery stenosis after liver transplantation: can a new cut-off value guide the next step? Zheng, Bo-wen Tan, Ying-yi Fu, Bin-sheng Tong, Ge Wu, Tao Wu, Li-li Meng, Xiao-chun Zheng, Rong-qin Yi, Shu-hong Ren, Jie Abdom Radiol (NY) Article PURPOSE: Considering the high false-positive diagnosis of the tardus parvus waveform (TPW) in Doppler ultrasonography (DUS) for hepatic artery stenosis (HAS) after liver transplantation (LT), this study aimed to determine clinical features and new cut-off values to help guide treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by an Institutional Review Board. A total of 171 LT recipients were included and underwent DUS and either computed tomography angiography or digital subtraction angiography with an interval < 4 weeks at least 1 month post-LT. The DUS of 69 patients exhibited TPW [defined as resistive index (RI) < 0.5 and systolic acceleration time (SAT) > 0.08 s]. A multilevel likelihood ratio (LR) analysis was used to explore new cut-off values for DUS. In addition, abnormal liver function was considered additional evidence (defined as any liver enzyme > 3-fold of the upper limit of normal level or 2-fold increased). The results were stratified into three categories, category 1 (subjects with traditional TPW), category 2 (subjects with traditional TPW and abnormal liver function), and category 3 (subjects with traditional TPW and abnormal liver function, or with new cut-off values), and the diagnostic performance of each category was analyzed. RESULTS: The LR analysis revealed new cut-off values of RI < 0.4 (LR = 10.58) or SAT > 0.12 s (LR = 16.46). The false-positive rates for categories 2 and 3 were significantly lower (7.6% vs. 18.1%, P = 0.038; 1.9% vs. 18.1%, P < 0.001, respectively) than those for category 1, while the sensitivity for category 2 was significantly lower (41.8% vs. 74.6%, P < 0.001; 41.8% vs. 61.2%, P = 0.038, respectively) than that for categories 1 and 3. CONCLUSION: Using either (1) RI < 0.4 or SAT > 0.12 s, or (2) traditional TPW (RI < 0.5 and SAT > 0.08 s) in the presence of abnormal liver functions as the DUS criteria for HAS will significantly decrease the false-positive rate compared to traditional TPW without a significant increase in the false-negative rate. Springer US 2017-10-23 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6061483/ /pubmed/29063132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1358-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Zheng, Bo-wen Tan, Ying-yi Fu, Bin-sheng Tong, Ge Wu, Tao Wu, Li-li Meng, Xiao-chun Zheng, Rong-qin Yi, Shu-hong Ren, Jie Tardus parvus waveforms in Doppler ultrasonography for hepatic artery stenosis after liver transplantation: can a new cut-off value guide the next step? |
title | Tardus parvus waveforms in Doppler ultrasonography for hepatic artery stenosis after liver transplantation: can a new cut-off value guide the next step? |
title_full | Tardus parvus waveforms in Doppler ultrasonography for hepatic artery stenosis after liver transplantation: can a new cut-off value guide the next step? |
title_fullStr | Tardus parvus waveforms in Doppler ultrasonography for hepatic artery stenosis after liver transplantation: can a new cut-off value guide the next step? |
title_full_unstemmed | Tardus parvus waveforms in Doppler ultrasonography for hepatic artery stenosis after liver transplantation: can a new cut-off value guide the next step? |
title_short | Tardus parvus waveforms in Doppler ultrasonography for hepatic artery stenosis after liver transplantation: can a new cut-off value guide the next step? |
title_sort | tardus parvus waveforms in doppler ultrasonography for hepatic artery stenosis after liver transplantation: can a new cut-off value guide the next step? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6061483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29063132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1358-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhengbowen tardusparvuswaveformsindopplerultrasonographyforhepaticarterystenosisafterlivertransplantationcananewcutoffvalueguidethenextstep AT tanyingyi tardusparvuswaveformsindopplerultrasonographyforhepaticarterystenosisafterlivertransplantationcananewcutoffvalueguidethenextstep AT fubinsheng tardusparvuswaveformsindopplerultrasonographyforhepaticarterystenosisafterlivertransplantationcananewcutoffvalueguidethenextstep AT tongge tardusparvuswaveformsindopplerultrasonographyforhepaticarterystenosisafterlivertransplantationcananewcutoffvalueguidethenextstep AT wutao tardusparvuswaveformsindopplerultrasonographyforhepaticarterystenosisafterlivertransplantationcananewcutoffvalueguidethenextstep AT wulili tardusparvuswaveformsindopplerultrasonographyforhepaticarterystenosisafterlivertransplantationcananewcutoffvalueguidethenextstep AT mengxiaochun tardusparvuswaveformsindopplerultrasonographyforhepaticarterystenosisafterlivertransplantationcananewcutoffvalueguidethenextstep AT zhengrongqin tardusparvuswaveformsindopplerultrasonographyforhepaticarterystenosisafterlivertransplantationcananewcutoffvalueguidethenextstep AT yishuhong tardusparvuswaveformsindopplerultrasonographyforhepaticarterystenosisafterlivertransplantationcananewcutoffvalueguidethenextstep AT renjie tardusparvuswaveformsindopplerultrasonographyforhepaticarterystenosisafterlivertransplantationcananewcutoffvalueguidethenextstep |