Cargando…

Neurophysiological signatures of Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration: pathology versus phenotype

The disruption of brain networks is characteristic of neurodegenerative dementias. However, it is controversial whether changes in connectivity reflect only the functional anatomy of disease, with selective vulnerability of brain networks, or the specific neurophysiological consequences of different...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sami, Saber, Williams, Nitin, Hughes, Laura E, Cope, Thomas E, Rittman, Timothy, Coyle-Gilchrist, Ian T S, Henson, Richard N, Rowe, James B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6061803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30060017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy180
_version_ 1783342294229843968
author Sami, Saber
Williams, Nitin
Hughes, Laura E
Cope, Thomas E
Rittman, Timothy
Coyle-Gilchrist, Ian T S
Henson, Richard N
Rowe, James B
author_facet Sami, Saber
Williams, Nitin
Hughes, Laura E
Cope, Thomas E
Rittman, Timothy
Coyle-Gilchrist, Ian T S
Henson, Richard N
Rowe, James B
author_sort Sami, Saber
collection PubMed
description The disruption of brain networks is characteristic of neurodegenerative dementias. However, it is controversial whether changes in connectivity reflect only the functional anatomy of disease, with selective vulnerability of brain networks, or the specific neurophysiological consequences of different neuropathologies within brain networks. We proposed that the oscillatory dynamics of cortical circuits reflect the tuning of local neural interactions, such that different pathologies are selective in their impact on the frequency spectrum of oscillations, whereas clinical syndromes reflect the anatomical distribution of pathology and physiological change. To test this hypothesis, we used magnetoencephalography from five patient groups, representing dissociated pathological subtypes and distributions across frontal, parietal and temporal lobes: amnestic Alzheimer’s disease, posterior cortical atrophy, and three syndromes associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration. We measured effective connectivity with graph theory-based measures of local efficiency, using partial directed coherence between sensors. As expected, each disease caused large-scale changes of neurophysiological brain networks, with reductions in local efficiency compared to controls. Critically however, the frequency range of altered connectivity was consistent across clinical syndromes that shared a likely underlying pathology, whilst the localization of changes differed between clinical syndromes. Multivariate pattern analysis of the frequency-specific topographies of local efficiency separated the disorders from each other and from controls (accuracy 62% to 100%, according to the groups’ differences in likely pathology and clinical syndrome). The data indicate that magnetoencephalography has the potential to reveal specific changes in neurophysiology resulting from neurodegenerative disease. Our findings confirm that while clinical syndromes have characteristic anatomical patterns of abnormal connectivity that may be identified with other methods like structural brain imaging, the different mechanisms of neurodegeneration also cause characteristic spectral signatures of physiological coupling that are not accessible with structural imaging nor confounded by the neurovascular signalling of functional MRI. We suggest that these spectral characteristics of altered connectivity are the result of differential disruption of neuronal microstructure and synaptic physiology by Alzheimer’s disease versus frontotemporal lobar degeneration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6061803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60618032018-08-07 Neurophysiological signatures of Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration: pathology versus phenotype Sami, Saber Williams, Nitin Hughes, Laura E Cope, Thomas E Rittman, Timothy Coyle-Gilchrist, Ian T S Henson, Richard N Rowe, James B Brain Original Articles The disruption of brain networks is characteristic of neurodegenerative dementias. However, it is controversial whether changes in connectivity reflect only the functional anatomy of disease, with selective vulnerability of brain networks, or the specific neurophysiological consequences of different neuropathologies within brain networks. We proposed that the oscillatory dynamics of cortical circuits reflect the tuning of local neural interactions, such that different pathologies are selective in their impact on the frequency spectrum of oscillations, whereas clinical syndromes reflect the anatomical distribution of pathology and physiological change. To test this hypothesis, we used magnetoencephalography from five patient groups, representing dissociated pathological subtypes and distributions across frontal, parietal and temporal lobes: amnestic Alzheimer’s disease, posterior cortical atrophy, and three syndromes associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration. We measured effective connectivity with graph theory-based measures of local efficiency, using partial directed coherence between sensors. As expected, each disease caused large-scale changes of neurophysiological brain networks, with reductions in local efficiency compared to controls. Critically however, the frequency range of altered connectivity was consistent across clinical syndromes that shared a likely underlying pathology, whilst the localization of changes differed between clinical syndromes. Multivariate pattern analysis of the frequency-specific topographies of local efficiency separated the disorders from each other and from controls (accuracy 62% to 100%, according to the groups’ differences in likely pathology and clinical syndrome). The data indicate that magnetoencephalography has the potential to reveal specific changes in neurophysiology resulting from neurodegenerative disease. Our findings confirm that while clinical syndromes have characteristic anatomical patterns of abnormal connectivity that may be identified with other methods like structural brain imaging, the different mechanisms of neurodegeneration also cause characteristic spectral signatures of physiological coupling that are not accessible with structural imaging nor confounded by the neurovascular signalling of functional MRI. We suggest that these spectral characteristics of altered connectivity are the result of differential disruption of neuronal microstructure and synaptic physiology by Alzheimer’s disease versus frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Oxford University Press 2018-08 2018-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6061803/ /pubmed/30060017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy180 Text en © The Author(s) (2018). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Sami, Saber
Williams, Nitin
Hughes, Laura E
Cope, Thomas E
Rittman, Timothy
Coyle-Gilchrist, Ian T S
Henson, Richard N
Rowe, James B
Neurophysiological signatures of Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration: pathology versus phenotype
title Neurophysiological signatures of Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration: pathology versus phenotype
title_full Neurophysiological signatures of Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration: pathology versus phenotype
title_fullStr Neurophysiological signatures of Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration: pathology versus phenotype
title_full_unstemmed Neurophysiological signatures of Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration: pathology versus phenotype
title_short Neurophysiological signatures of Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration: pathology versus phenotype
title_sort neurophysiological signatures of alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration: pathology versus phenotype
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6061803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30060017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy180
work_keys_str_mv AT samisaber neurophysiologicalsignaturesofalzheimersdiseaseandfrontotemporallobardegenerationpathologyversusphenotype
AT williamsnitin neurophysiologicalsignaturesofalzheimersdiseaseandfrontotemporallobardegenerationpathologyversusphenotype
AT hugheslaurae neurophysiologicalsignaturesofalzheimersdiseaseandfrontotemporallobardegenerationpathologyversusphenotype
AT copethomase neurophysiologicalsignaturesofalzheimersdiseaseandfrontotemporallobardegenerationpathologyversusphenotype
AT rittmantimothy neurophysiologicalsignaturesofalzheimersdiseaseandfrontotemporallobardegenerationpathologyversusphenotype
AT coylegilchristiants neurophysiologicalsignaturesofalzheimersdiseaseandfrontotemporallobardegenerationpathologyversusphenotype
AT hensonrichardn neurophysiologicalsignaturesofalzheimersdiseaseandfrontotemporallobardegenerationpathologyversusphenotype
AT rowejamesb neurophysiologicalsignaturesofalzheimersdiseaseandfrontotemporallobardegenerationpathologyversusphenotype