Cargando…

Impact of a Multidisciplinary Infection Prevention Initiative on Central Line and Urinary Catheter Utilization in a Long-term Acute Care Hospital

BACKGROUND: Prolonged central line (CL) and urinary catheter (UC) use can increase risk of central line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). METHODS: This interventional study conducted in a 76-bed long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chandramohan, Suganya, Navalkele, Bhagyashri, Mushtaq, Ammara, Krishna, Amar, Kacir, John, Chopra, Teena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6061847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30090837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy156
_version_ 1783342301809999872
author Chandramohan, Suganya
Navalkele, Bhagyashri
Mushtaq, Ammara
Krishna, Amar
Kacir, John
Chopra, Teena
author_facet Chandramohan, Suganya
Navalkele, Bhagyashri
Mushtaq, Ammara
Krishna, Amar
Kacir, John
Chopra, Teena
author_sort Chandramohan, Suganya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prolonged central line (CL) and urinary catheter (UC) use can increase risk of central line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). METHODS: This interventional study conducted in a 76-bed long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) in Southeast Michigan was divided into 3 periods: pre-intervention (January 2015–June 2015), intervention (July–November 2015), and postintervention (December 2015–March 2017). During the intervention period, a multidisciplinary infection prevention team (MIPT) made weekly recommendations to remove unnecessary CL/UC or switch to alternate urinary/intravenous access. Device utilization ratios (DURs) and infection rates were compared between the study periods. Interrupted time series (ITS) and 0-inflated poisson (ZIP) regression were used to analyze DUR and CLABSI/CAUTI data, respectively. RESULTS: UC-DUR was 31% in the pre- and postintervention periods and 21% in the intervention period. CL-DUR decreased from 46% (pre-intervention) to 39% (intervention) to 37% (postintervention). The results of ITS analysis indicated nonsignificant decrease and increase in level/trend in DURs coinciding with our intervention. The CAUTI rate per catheter-days did not decrease during intervention (4.36) compared with pre- (2.49) and postintervention (1.93). The CLABSI rate per catheter-days decreased by 73% during intervention (0.39) compared with pre-intervention (1.45). Rates again quadrupled postintervention (1.58). ZIP analysis indicated a beneficial effect of intervention on infection rates without reaching statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that a workable MIPT initiative focusing on removal of unnecessary CL and UC can be easily implemented in an LTACH requiring minimal time and resources. A rebound increase in UC-DURs to pre-intervention levels after intervention end indicates that continued vigilance is required to maintain performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6061847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60618472018-08-08 Impact of a Multidisciplinary Infection Prevention Initiative on Central Line and Urinary Catheter Utilization in a Long-term Acute Care Hospital Chandramohan, Suganya Navalkele, Bhagyashri Mushtaq, Ammara Krishna, Amar Kacir, John Chopra, Teena Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: Prolonged central line (CL) and urinary catheter (UC) use can increase risk of central line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). METHODS: This interventional study conducted in a 76-bed long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) in Southeast Michigan was divided into 3 periods: pre-intervention (January 2015–June 2015), intervention (July–November 2015), and postintervention (December 2015–March 2017). During the intervention period, a multidisciplinary infection prevention team (MIPT) made weekly recommendations to remove unnecessary CL/UC or switch to alternate urinary/intravenous access. Device utilization ratios (DURs) and infection rates were compared between the study periods. Interrupted time series (ITS) and 0-inflated poisson (ZIP) regression were used to analyze DUR and CLABSI/CAUTI data, respectively. RESULTS: UC-DUR was 31% in the pre- and postintervention periods and 21% in the intervention period. CL-DUR decreased from 46% (pre-intervention) to 39% (intervention) to 37% (postintervention). The results of ITS analysis indicated nonsignificant decrease and increase in level/trend in DURs coinciding with our intervention. The CAUTI rate per catheter-days did not decrease during intervention (4.36) compared with pre- (2.49) and postintervention (1.93). The CLABSI rate per catheter-days decreased by 73% during intervention (0.39) compared with pre-intervention (1.45). Rates again quadrupled postintervention (1.58). ZIP analysis indicated a beneficial effect of intervention on infection rates without reaching statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that a workable MIPT initiative focusing on removal of unnecessary CL and UC can be easily implemented in an LTACH requiring minimal time and resources. A rebound increase in UC-DURs to pre-intervention levels after intervention end indicates that continued vigilance is required to maintain performance. Oxford University Press 2018-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6061847/ /pubmed/30090837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy156 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Major Article
Chandramohan, Suganya
Navalkele, Bhagyashri
Mushtaq, Ammara
Krishna, Amar
Kacir, John
Chopra, Teena
Impact of a Multidisciplinary Infection Prevention Initiative on Central Line and Urinary Catheter Utilization in a Long-term Acute Care Hospital
title Impact of a Multidisciplinary Infection Prevention Initiative on Central Line and Urinary Catheter Utilization in a Long-term Acute Care Hospital
title_full Impact of a Multidisciplinary Infection Prevention Initiative on Central Line and Urinary Catheter Utilization in a Long-term Acute Care Hospital
title_fullStr Impact of a Multidisciplinary Infection Prevention Initiative on Central Line and Urinary Catheter Utilization in a Long-term Acute Care Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Impact of a Multidisciplinary Infection Prevention Initiative on Central Line and Urinary Catheter Utilization in a Long-term Acute Care Hospital
title_short Impact of a Multidisciplinary Infection Prevention Initiative on Central Line and Urinary Catheter Utilization in a Long-term Acute Care Hospital
title_sort impact of a multidisciplinary infection prevention initiative on central line and urinary catheter utilization in a long-term acute care hospital
topic Major Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6061847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30090837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy156
work_keys_str_mv AT chandramohansuganya impactofamultidisciplinaryinfectionpreventioninitiativeoncentrallineandurinarycatheterutilizationinalongtermacutecarehospital
AT navalkelebhagyashri impactofamultidisciplinaryinfectionpreventioninitiativeoncentrallineandurinarycatheterutilizationinalongtermacutecarehospital
AT mushtaqammara impactofamultidisciplinaryinfectionpreventioninitiativeoncentrallineandurinarycatheterutilizationinalongtermacutecarehospital
AT krishnaamar impactofamultidisciplinaryinfectionpreventioninitiativeoncentrallineandurinarycatheterutilizationinalongtermacutecarehospital
AT kacirjohn impactofamultidisciplinaryinfectionpreventioninitiativeoncentrallineandurinarycatheterutilizationinalongtermacutecarehospital
AT choprateena impactofamultidisciplinaryinfectionpreventioninitiativeoncentrallineandurinarycatheterutilizationinalongtermacutecarehospital