Cargando…

Lead content in wild game shot with lead or non-lead ammunition – Does “state of the art consumer health protection” require non-lead ammunition?

The toxicity of lead has been known for a long time, and no safe uptake level can be derived for humans. Consumers’ intake via food should therefore be kept as low as possible. Game meat can contain elevated levels of lead due to the use of lead ammunition for hunting. A risk assessment conducted in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gerofke, Antje, Ulbig, Ellen, Martin, Annett, Müller-Graf, Christine, Selhorst, Thomas, Gremse, Carl, Spolders, Markus, Schafft, Helmut, Heinemeyer, Gerhard, Greiner, Matthias, Lahrssen-Wiederholt, Monika, Hensel, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30048463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200792
_version_ 1783342324685733888
author Gerofke, Antje
Ulbig, Ellen
Martin, Annett
Müller-Graf, Christine
Selhorst, Thomas
Gremse, Carl
Spolders, Markus
Schafft, Helmut
Heinemeyer, Gerhard
Greiner, Matthias
Lahrssen-Wiederholt, Monika
Hensel, Andreas
author_facet Gerofke, Antje
Ulbig, Ellen
Martin, Annett
Müller-Graf, Christine
Selhorst, Thomas
Gremse, Carl
Spolders, Markus
Schafft, Helmut
Heinemeyer, Gerhard
Greiner, Matthias
Lahrssen-Wiederholt, Monika
Hensel, Andreas
author_sort Gerofke, Antje
collection PubMed
description The toxicity of lead has been known for a long time, and no safe uptake level can be derived for humans. Consumers’ intake via food should therefore be kept as low as possible. Game meat can contain elevated levels of lead due to the use of lead ammunition for hunting. A risk assessment conducted in 2010 by the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment including various consumption scenarios revealed a possible health risk for extreme consumers of game meat hunted with lead ammunition (i.e. hunters and members of hunters’ households). Babies, infants, children and women of childbearing age were identified as vulnerable group with regards to the developmental neurotoxicity of lead. It was noted, that a sound data base was required in order to refine the assessment. Therefore, the research project “Safety of game meat obtained through hunting” (LEMISI) has been conducted in Germany, with the aims of determining the concentrations of lead (as well as of copper and zinc) brought into the edible parts of game meat (roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and wild boar (Sus scrofa)) due to using either lead or non-lead hunting ammunition, whilst concurrently taking geogenic (i.e. “background”) levels of lead into account. Compared to non-lead ammunition, lead ammunition significantly increased lead concentrations in the game meat. The use of both lead and non-lead ammunition deposited copper and zinc in the edible parts of game meat, and the concentrations were in the range of those detected regularly in meat of farm animals. For the average consumer of game meat in Germany the additional uptake of lead only makes a minor contribution to the average alimentary lead exposure. However, for consumers from hunters’ households the resulting uptake of lead–due to lead ammunition—can be several times higher than the average alimentary lead exposure. Non-lead bullets in combination with suitable game meat hygienic measures are therefore recommended in order to ensure “state of the art consumer health protection”.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6062035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60620352018-08-03 Lead content in wild game shot with lead or non-lead ammunition – Does “state of the art consumer health protection” require non-lead ammunition? Gerofke, Antje Ulbig, Ellen Martin, Annett Müller-Graf, Christine Selhorst, Thomas Gremse, Carl Spolders, Markus Schafft, Helmut Heinemeyer, Gerhard Greiner, Matthias Lahrssen-Wiederholt, Monika Hensel, Andreas PLoS One Research Article The toxicity of lead has been known for a long time, and no safe uptake level can be derived for humans. Consumers’ intake via food should therefore be kept as low as possible. Game meat can contain elevated levels of lead due to the use of lead ammunition for hunting. A risk assessment conducted in 2010 by the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment including various consumption scenarios revealed a possible health risk for extreme consumers of game meat hunted with lead ammunition (i.e. hunters and members of hunters’ households). Babies, infants, children and women of childbearing age were identified as vulnerable group with regards to the developmental neurotoxicity of lead. It was noted, that a sound data base was required in order to refine the assessment. Therefore, the research project “Safety of game meat obtained through hunting” (LEMISI) has been conducted in Germany, with the aims of determining the concentrations of lead (as well as of copper and zinc) brought into the edible parts of game meat (roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and wild boar (Sus scrofa)) due to using either lead or non-lead hunting ammunition, whilst concurrently taking geogenic (i.e. “background”) levels of lead into account. Compared to non-lead ammunition, lead ammunition significantly increased lead concentrations in the game meat. The use of both lead and non-lead ammunition deposited copper and zinc in the edible parts of game meat, and the concentrations were in the range of those detected regularly in meat of farm animals. For the average consumer of game meat in Germany the additional uptake of lead only makes a minor contribution to the average alimentary lead exposure. However, for consumers from hunters’ households the resulting uptake of lead–due to lead ammunition—can be several times higher than the average alimentary lead exposure. Non-lead bullets in combination with suitable game meat hygienic measures are therefore recommended in order to ensure “state of the art consumer health protection”. Public Library of Science 2018-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6062035/ /pubmed/30048463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200792 Text en © 2018 Gerofke et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gerofke, Antje
Ulbig, Ellen
Martin, Annett
Müller-Graf, Christine
Selhorst, Thomas
Gremse, Carl
Spolders, Markus
Schafft, Helmut
Heinemeyer, Gerhard
Greiner, Matthias
Lahrssen-Wiederholt, Monika
Hensel, Andreas
Lead content in wild game shot with lead or non-lead ammunition – Does “state of the art consumer health protection” require non-lead ammunition?
title Lead content in wild game shot with lead or non-lead ammunition – Does “state of the art consumer health protection” require non-lead ammunition?
title_full Lead content in wild game shot with lead or non-lead ammunition – Does “state of the art consumer health protection” require non-lead ammunition?
title_fullStr Lead content in wild game shot with lead or non-lead ammunition – Does “state of the art consumer health protection” require non-lead ammunition?
title_full_unstemmed Lead content in wild game shot with lead or non-lead ammunition – Does “state of the art consumer health protection” require non-lead ammunition?
title_short Lead content in wild game shot with lead or non-lead ammunition – Does “state of the art consumer health protection” require non-lead ammunition?
title_sort lead content in wild game shot with lead or non-lead ammunition – does “state of the art consumer health protection” require non-lead ammunition?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30048463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200792
work_keys_str_mv AT gerofkeantje leadcontentinwildgameshotwithleadornonleadammunitiondoesstateoftheartconsumerhealthprotectionrequirenonleadammunition
AT ulbigellen leadcontentinwildgameshotwithleadornonleadammunitiondoesstateoftheartconsumerhealthprotectionrequirenonleadammunition
AT martinannett leadcontentinwildgameshotwithleadornonleadammunitiondoesstateoftheartconsumerhealthprotectionrequirenonleadammunition
AT mullergrafchristine leadcontentinwildgameshotwithleadornonleadammunitiondoesstateoftheartconsumerhealthprotectionrequirenonleadammunition
AT selhorstthomas leadcontentinwildgameshotwithleadornonleadammunitiondoesstateoftheartconsumerhealthprotectionrequirenonleadammunition
AT gremsecarl leadcontentinwildgameshotwithleadornonleadammunitiondoesstateoftheartconsumerhealthprotectionrequirenonleadammunition
AT spoldersmarkus leadcontentinwildgameshotwithleadornonleadammunitiondoesstateoftheartconsumerhealthprotectionrequirenonleadammunition
AT schaffthelmut leadcontentinwildgameshotwithleadornonleadammunitiondoesstateoftheartconsumerhealthprotectionrequirenonleadammunition
AT heinemeyergerhard leadcontentinwildgameshotwithleadornonleadammunitiondoesstateoftheartconsumerhealthprotectionrequirenonleadammunition
AT greinermatthias leadcontentinwildgameshotwithleadornonleadammunitiondoesstateoftheartconsumerhealthprotectionrequirenonleadammunition
AT lahrssenwiederholtmonika leadcontentinwildgameshotwithleadornonleadammunitiondoesstateoftheartconsumerhealthprotectionrequirenonleadammunition
AT henselandreas leadcontentinwildgameshotwithleadornonleadammunitiondoesstateoftheartconsumerhealthprotectionrequirenonleadammunition