Cargando…

StartReact effects in first dorsal interosseous muscle are absent in a pinch task, but present when combined with elbow flexion

OBJECTIVE: To provide a neurophysiological tool for assessing sensorimotor pathways, which may differ for those involving distal muscles in simple tasks from those involving distal muscles in a kinetic chain task, or proximal muscles in both. METHODS: We compared latencies and magnitudes of motor re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castellote, Juan M., Kofler, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30048503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201301
_version_ 1783342333358505984
author Castellote, Juan M.
Kofler, Markus
author_facet Castellote, Juan M.
Kofler, Markus
author_sort Castellote, Juan M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To provide a neurophysiological tool for assessing sensorimotor pathways, which may differ for those involving distal muscles in simple tasks from those involving distal muscles in a kinetic chain task, or proximal muscles in both. METHODS: We compared latencies and magnitudes of motor responses in a reaction time paradigm in a proximal (biceps brachii, BB) and a distal (first dorsal interosseous, FDI) muscle following electrical stimuli used as imperative signal (IS) delivered to the index finger. These stimuli were applied during different motor tasks: simple tasks involving either one muscle, e.g. flexing the elbow for BB (FLEX), or pinching a pen for FDI (PINCH); combined tasks engaging both muscles by pinching and flexing simultaneously (PINCH-FLEX). Stimuli were of varying intensity and occasionally elicited a startle response, and a StartReact effect. RESULTS: In BB, response latencies decreased gradually and response amplitudes increased progressively with increasing IS intensities for non-startling trials, while for trials containing startle responses, latencies were uniformly shortened and response amplitudes similarly augmented across all IS intensities in both FLEX and PINCH-FLEX. In FDI, response latencies decreased gradually and response amplitudes increased progressively with increasing IS intensities in both PINCH and PINCH-FLEX for non-startling trials, but, unlike in BB for the simple task, in PINCH for trials containing startle responses as well. In PINCH-FLEX, FDI latencies were uniformly shortened and amplitudes similarly increased across all stimulus intensities whenever startle signs were present. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest the presence of different sensorimotor pathways supporting a dissociation between simple tasks that involve distal upper limb muscles (FDI in PINCH) from simple tasks involving proximal muscles (BB in FLEX), and combined tasks that engage both muscles (FDI and BB in PINCH-FLEX), all in accordance with differential importance in the control of movements by cortical and subcortical structures. SIGNIFICANCE: Simple assessment tools may provide useful information regarding the differential involvement of sensorimotor pathways in the control of both simple and combined tasks that engage proximal and distal muscles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6062078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60620782018-08-03 StartReact effects in first dorsal interosseous muscle are absent in a pinch task, but present when combined with elbow flexion Castellote, Juan M. Kofler, Markus PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To provide a neurophysiological tool for assessing sensorimotor pathways, which may differ for those involving distal muscles in simple tasks from those involving distal muscles in a kinetic chain task, or proximal muscles in both. METHODS: We compared latencies and magnitudes of motor responses in a reaction time paradigm in a proximal (biceps brachii, BB) and a distal (first dorsal interosseous, FDI) muscle following electrical stimuli used as imperative signal (IS) delivered to the index finger. These stimuli were applied during different motor tasks: simple tasks involving either one muscle, e.g. flexing the elbow for BB (FLEX), or pinching a pen for FDI (PINCH); combined tasks engaging both muscles by pinching and flexing simultaneously (PINCH-FLEX). Stimuli were of varying intensity and occasionally elicited a startle response, and a StartReact effect. RESULTS: In BB, response latencies decreased gradually and response amplitudes increased progressively with increasing IS intensities for non-startling trials, while for trials containing startle responses, latencies were uniformly shortened and response amplitudes similarly augmented across all IS intensities in both FLEX and PINCH-FLEX. In FDI, response latencies decreased gradually and response amplitudes increased progressively with increasing IS intensities in both PINCH and PINCH-FLEX for non-startling trials, but, unlike in BB for the simple task, in PINCH for trials containing startle responses as well. In PINCH-FLEX, FDI latencies were uniformly shortened and amplitudes similarly increased across all stimulus intensities whenever startle signs were present. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest the presence of different sensorimotor pathways supporting a dissociation between simple tasks that involve distal upper limb muscles (FDI in PINCH) from simple tasks involving proximal muscles (BB in FLEX), and combined tasks that engage both muscles (FDI and BB in PINCH-FLEX), all in accordance with differential importance in the control of movements by cortical and subcortical structures. SIGNIFICANCE: Simple assessment tools may provide useful information regarding the differential involvement of sensorimotor pathways in the control of both simple and combined tasks that engage proximal and distal muscles. Public Library of Science 2018-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6062078/ /pubmed/30048503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201301 Text en © 2018 Castellote, Kofler http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Castellote, Juan M.
Kofler, Markus
StartReact effects in first dorsal interosseous muscle are absent in a pinch task, but present when combined with elbow flexion
title StartReact effects in first dorsal interosseous muscle are absent in a pinch task, but present when combined with elbow flexion
title_full StartReact effects in first dorsal interosseous muscle are absent in a pinch task, but present when combined with elbow flexion
title_fullStr StartReact effects in first dorsal interosseous muscle are absent in a pinch task, but present when combined with elbow flexion
title_full_unstemmed StartReact effects in first dorsal interosseous muscle are absent in a pinch task, but present when combined with elbow flexion
title_short StartReact effects in first dorsal interosseous muscle are absent in a pinch task, but present when combined with elbow flexion
title_sort startreact effects in first dorsal interosseous muscle are absent in a pinch task, but present when combined with elbow flexion
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30048503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201301
work_keys_str_mv AT castellotejuanm startreacteffectsinfirstdorsalinterosseousmuscleareabsentinapinchtaskbutpresentwhencombinedwithelbowflexion
AT koflermarkus startreacteffectsinfirstdorsalinterosseousmuscleareabsentinapinchtaskbutpresentwhencombinedwithelbowflexion