Cargando…

Assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings

Ebola and cholera treatment centres (ETC and CTC) generate considerable quantities of excreta that can further the transmission of disease amongst patients and health workers. Therefore, approaches for the safe handling, containment and removal of excreta within such settings are needed to minimise...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trajano Gomes da Silva, Diogo, Dias, Edgard, Ebdon, James, Taylor, Huw
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30048542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201344
_version_ 1783342343504527360
author Trajano Gomes da Silva, Diogo
Dias, Edgard
Ebdon, James
Taylor, Huw
author_facet Trajano Gomes da Silva, Diogo
Dias, Edgard
Ebdon, James
Taylor, Huw
author_sort Trajano Gomes da Silva, Diogo
collection PubMed
description Ebola and cholera treatment centres (ETC and CTC) generate considerable quantities of excreta that can further the transmission of disease amongst patients and health workers. Therefore, approaches for the safe handling, containment and removal of excreta within such settings are needed to minimise the likelihood of onward disease transmission. This study compared the performance and suitability of three chlorine-based approaches (0.5% HTH, NaDCC and NaOCl (domestic bleach)) and three lime-based approaches (10%, 20% and 30% Ca(OH)(2)). The experiments followed recent recommendations for Ebola Treatment Centres. Three excreta matrices containing either raw municipal wastewater, or raw municipal wastewater plus 10% or 20% (w/v) added faecal sludge, were treated in 14 litre buckets at a ratio of 1:10 (chlorine solutions or lime suspensions: excreta matrix). The effects of mixing versus non-mixing and increasing contact time (10 and 30 mins) were also investigated. Bacterial (faecal coliforms (FC) and intestinal enterococci (IE)) and viral (somatic coliphages (SOMPH), F(+)specific phages (F+PH) and Bacteroides fragilis phages (GB-124PH)) indicators were used to determine the efficacy of each approach. Lime-based approaches provided greater treatment efficacy than chlorine-based approaches, with lime (30% w/v) demonstrating the greatest efficacy (log reductions values, FC = 4.75, IE = 4.16, SOMPH = 2.85, F+PH = 5.13 and GB124PH = 5.41). There was no statistical difference in efficacy between any of the chlorine-based approaches, and the highest log reduction values were: FC = 2.90, IE = 2.36, SOMPH = 3.01, F+PH = 2.36 and GB124PH = 0.74. No statistical difference was observed with respect to contact time for any of the approaches, and no statistical differences were observed with respect to mixing for the chlorine-based approaches. However, statistically significant increases in the efficacy of some lime-based approaches were observed following mixing. These findings provide evidence and practical advice to inform safe handling and containment of excreta and ensure more effective health protection in future emergency settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6062132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60621322018-08-03 Assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings Trajano Gomes da Silva, Diogo Dias, Edgard Ebdon, James Taylor, Huw PLoS One Research Article Ebola and cholera treatment centres (ETC and CTC) generate considerable quantities of excreta that can further the transmission of disease amongst patients and health workers. Therefore, approaches for the safe handling, containment and removal of excreta within such settings are needed to minimise the likelihood of onward disease transmission. This study compared the performance and suitability of three chlorine-based approaches (0.5% HTH, NaDCC and NaOCl (domestic bleach)) and three lime-based approaches (10%, 20% and 30% Ca(OH)(2)). The experiments followed recent recommendations for Ebola Treatment Centres. Three excreta matrices containing either raw municipal wastewater, or raw municipal wastewater plus 10% or 20% (w/v) added faecal sludge, were treated in 14 litre buckets at a ratio of 1:10 (chlorine solutions or lime suspensions: excreta matrix). The effects of mixing versus non-mixing and increasing contact time (10 and 30 mins) were also investigated. Bacterial (faecal coliforms (FC) and intestinal enterococci (IE)) and viral (somatic coliphages (SOMPH), F(+)specific phages (F+PH) and Bacteroides fragilis phages (GB-124PH)) indicators were used to determine the efficacy of each approach. Lime-based approaches provided greater treatment efficacy than chlorine-based approaches, with lime (30% w/v) demonstrating the greatest efficacy (log reductions values, FC = 4.75, IE = 4.16, SOMPH = 2.85, F+PH = 5.13 and GB124PH = 5.41). There was no statistical difference in efficacy between any of the chlorine-based approaches, and the highest log reduction values were: FC = 2.90, IE = 2.36, SOMPH = 3.01, F+PH = 2.36 and GB124PH = 0.74. No statistical difference was observed with respect to contact time for any of the approaches, and no statistical differences were observed with respect to mixing for the chlorine-based approaches. However, statistically significant increases in the efficacy of some lime-based approaches were observed following mixing. These findings provide evidence and practical advice to inform safe handling and containment of excreta and ensure more effective health protection in future emergency settings. Public Library of Science 2018-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6062132/ /pubmed/30048542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201344 Text en © 2018 Trajano Gomes da Silva et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Trajano Gomes da Silva, Diogo
Dias, Edgard
Ebdon, James
Taylor, Huw
Assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings
title Assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings
title_full Assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings
title_fullStr Assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings
title_short Assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings
title_sort assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30048542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201344
work_keys_str_mv AT trajanogomesdasilvadiogo assessmentofrecommendedapproachesforcontainmentandsafehandlingofhumanexcretainemergencysettings
AT diasedgard assessmentofrecommendedapproachesforcontainmentandsafehandlingofhumanexcretainemergencysettings
AT ebdonjames assessmentofrecommendedapproachesforcontainmentandsafehandlingofhumanexcretainemergencysettings
AT taylorhuw assessmentofrecommendedapproachesforcontainmentandsafehandlingofhumanexcretainemergencysettings