Cargando…
Assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings
Ebola and cholera treatment centres (ETC and CTC) generate considerable quantities of excreta that can further the transmission of disease amongst patients and health workers. Therefore, approaches for the safe handling, containment and removal of excreta within such settings are needed to minimise...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30048542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201344 |
_version_ | 1783342343504527360 |
---|---|
author | Trajano Gomes da Silva, Diogo Dias, Edgard Ebdon, James Taylor, Huw |
author_facet | Trajano Gomes da Silva, Diogo Dias, Edgard Ebdon, James Taylor, Huw |
author_sort | Trajano Gomes da Silva, Diogo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ebola and cholera treatment centres (ETC and CTC) generate considerable quantities of excreta that can further the transmission of disease amongst patients and health workers. Therefore, approaches for the safe handling, containment and removal of excreta within such settings are needed to minimise the likelihood of onward disease transmission. This study compared the performance and suitability of three chlorine-based approaches (0.5% HTH, NaDCC and NaOCl (domestic bleach)) and three lime-based approaches (10%, 20% and 30% Ca(OH)(2)). The experiments followed recent recommendations for Ebola Treatment Centres. Three excreta matrices containing either raw municipal wastewater, or raw municipal wastewater plus 10% or 20% (w/v) added faecal sludge, were treated in 14 litre buckets at a ratio of 1:10 (chlorine solutions or lime suspensions: excreta matrix). The effects of mixing versus non-mixing and increasing contact time (10 and 30 mins) were also investigated. Bacterial (faecal coliforms (FC) and intestinal enterococci (IE)) and viral (somatic coliphages (SOMPH), F(+)specific phages (F+PH) and Bacteroides fragilis phages (GB-124PH)) indicators were used to determine the efficacy of each approach. Lime-based approaches provided greater treatment efficacy than chlorine-based approaches, with lime (30% w/v) demonstrating the greatest efficacy (log reductions values, FC = 4.75, IE = 4.16, SOMPH = 2.85, F+PH = 5.13 and GB124PH = 5.41). There was no statistical difference in efficacy between any of the chlorine-based approaches, and the highest log reduction values were: FC = 2.90, IE = 2.36, SOMPH = 3.01, F+PH = 2.36 and GB124PH = 0.74. No statistical difference was observed with respect to contact time for any of the approaches, and no statistical differences were observed with respect to mixing for the chlorine-based approaches. However, statistically significant increases in the efficacy of some lime-based approaches were observed following mixing. These findings provide evidence and practical advice to inform safe handling and containment of excreta and ensure more effective health protection in future emergency settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6062132 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60621322018-08-03 Assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings Trajano Gomes da Silva, Diogo Dias, Edgard Ebdon, James Taylor, Huw PLoS One Research Article Ebola and cholera treatment centres (ETC and CTC) generate considerable quantities of excreta that can further the transmission of disease amongst patients and health workers. Therefore, approaches for the safe handling, containment and removal of excreta within such settings are needed to minimise the likelihood of onward disease transmission. This study compared the performance and suitability of three chlorine-based approaches (0.5% HTH, NaDCC and NaOCl (domestic bleach)) and three lime-based approaches (10%, 20% and 30% Ca(OH)(2)). The experiments followed recent recommendations for Ebola Treatment Centres. Three excreta matrices containing either raw municipal wastewater, or raw municipal wastewater plus 10% or 20% (w/v) added faecal sludge, were treated in 14 litre buckets at a ratio of 1:10 (chlorine solutions or lime suspensions: excreta matrix). The effects of mixing versus non-mixing and increasing contact time (10 and 30 mins) were also investigated. Bacterial (faecal coliforms (FC) and intestinal enterococci (IE)) and viral (somatic coliphages (SOMPH), F(+)specific phages (F+PH) and Bacteroides fragilis phages (GB-124PH)) indicators were used to determine the efficacy of each approach. Lime-based approaches provided greater treatment efficacy than chlorine-based approaches, with lime (30% w/v) demonstrating the greatest efficacy (log reductions values, FC = 4.75, IE = 4.16, SOMPH = 2.85, F+PH = 5.13 and GB124PH = 5.41). There was no statistical difference in efficacy between any of the chlorine-based approaches, and the highest log reduction values were: FC = 2.90, IE = 2.36, SOMPH = 3.01, F+PH = 2.36 and GB124PH = 0.74. No statistical difference was observed with respect to contact time for any of the approaches, and no statistical differences were observed with respect to mixing for the chlorine-based approaches. However, statistically significant increases in the efficacy of some lime-based approaches were observed following mixing. These findings provide evidence and practical advice to inform safe handling and containment of excreta and ensure more effective health protection in future emergency settings. Public Library of Science 2018-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6062132/ /pubmed/30048542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201344 Text en © 2018 Trajano Gomes da Silva et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Trajano Gomes da Silva, Diogo Dias, Edgard Ebdon, James Taylor, Huw Assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings |
title | Assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings |
title_full | Assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings |
title_fullStr | Assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings |
title_short | Assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings |
title_sort | assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30048542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201344 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trajanogomesdasilvadiogo assessmentofrecommendedapproachesforcontainmentandsafehandlingofhumanexcretainemergencysettings AT diasedgard assessmentofrecommendedapproachesforcontainmentandsafehandlingofhumanexcretainemergencysettings AT ebdonjames assessmentofrecommendedapproachesforcontainmentandsafehandlingofhumanexcretainemergencysettings AT taylorhuw assessmentofrecommendedapproachesforcontainmentandsafehandlingofhumanexcretainemergencysettings |