Cargando…

Camptodactyly: An unsolved area of plastic surgery

BACKGROUND: Camptodactyly refers to permanent flexion contracture at the proximal interphalangeal joint. Most cases are limited to fifth-finger involvement. Although common, the treatment of camptodactyly is controversial. Many published studies have emphasized conservative treatment, while others h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Veena, Haq, Ansarul, Priyadarshini, Puja, Kumar, Purshottam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30037198
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.00759
_version_ 1783342424311988224
author Singh, Veena
Haq, Ansarul
Priyadarshini, Puja
Kumar, Purshottam
author_facet Singh, Veena
Haq, Ansarul
Priyadarshini, Puja
Kumar, Purshottam
author_sort Singh, Veena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Camptodactyly refers to permanent flexion contracture at the proximal interphalangeal joint. Most cases are limited to fifth-finger involvement. Although common, the treatment of camptodactyly is controversial. Many published studies have emphasized conservative treatment, while others have described surgical procedures. The problem with this deformity is that it presents in several forms, which means that there is no single model for effective treatment. The aim of this paper is to present the difficulties encountered with this condition and the management thereof on an individual basis. METHODS: This is a case series of 14 patients (nine males, five females) who underwent surgical treatment. The results were classified using the method from Mayo Clinic as excellent, good, fair, and poor. RESULTS: Fourteen patients with 15 fingers underwent surgery, and the results achieved were as follows: excellent, 0; good, 1; fair, 6; poor, 8. The treatment of camptodactyly still remains controversial, and hence proper planning individualized to each patient is needed to achieve the maximal improvement with realistic goals. CONCLUSIONS: Although we performed individualised surgery, our careful follow-up was not able to identify any method as superior over another with respect to gain in extension and loss of flexion. We therefore propose that the extensor mechanism should not be disturbed during surgery to treat camptodactyly cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6062706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60627062018-08-03 Camptodactyly: An unsolved area of plastic surgery Singh, Veena Haq, Ansarul Priyadarshini, Puja Kumar, Purshottam Arch Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Camptodactyly refers to permanent flexion contracture at the proximal interphalangeal joint. Most cases are limited to fifth-finger involvement. Although common, the treatment of camptodactyly is controversial. Many published studies have emphasized conservative treatment, while others have described surgical procedures. The problem with this deformity is that it presents in several forms, which means that there is no single model for effective treatment. The aim of this paper is to present the difficulties encountered with this condition and the management thereof on an individual basis. METHODS: This is a case series of 14 patients (nine males, five females) who underwent surgical treatment. The results were classified using the method from Mayo Clinic as excellent, good, fair, and poor. RESULTS: Fourteen patients with 15 fingers underwent surgery, and the results achieved were as follows: excellent, 0; good, 1; fair, 6; poor, 8. The treatment of camptodactyly still remains controversial, and hence proper planning individualized to each patient is needed to achieve the maximal improvement with realistic goals. CONCLUSIONS: Although we performed individualised surgery, our careful follow-up was not able to identify any method as superior over another with respect to gain in extension and loss of flexion. We therefore propose that the extensor mechanism should not be disturbed during surgery to treat camptodactyly cases. Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2018-07 2018-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6062706/ /pubmed/30037198 http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.00759 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Singh, Veena
Haq, Ansarul
Priyadarshini, Puja
Kumar, Purshottam
Camptodactyly: An unsolved area of plastic surgery
title Camptodactyly: An unsolved area of plastic surgery
title_full Camptodactyly: An unsolved area of plastic surgery
title_fullStr Camptodactyly: An unsolved area of plastic surgery
title_full_unstemmed Camptodactyly: An unsolved area of plastic surgery
title_short Camptodactyly: An unsolved area of plastic surgery
title_sort camptodactyly: an unsolved area of plastic surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30037198
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.00759
work_keys_str_mv AT singhveena camptodactylyanunsolvedareaofplasticsurgery
AT haqansarul camptodactylyanunsolvedareaofplasticsurgery
AT priyadarshinipuja camptodactylyanunsolvedareaofplasticsurgery
AT kumarpurshottam camptodactylyanunsolvedareaofplasticsurgery