Cargando…

Patient portal adoption and use by hospitalized cancer patients: a retrospective study of its impact on adverse events, utilization, and patient satisfaction

BACKGROUND: Portal use has been studied among outpatients, but its utility and impact on inpatients is unclear. This study describes portal adoption and use among hospitalized cancer patients and investigates associations with selected safety, utilization, and satisfaction measures. METHODS: A retro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aljabri, Duaa, Dumitrascu, Adrian, Burton, M. Caroline, White, Launia, Khan, Mahmud, Xirasagar, Sudha, Horner, Ronnie, Naessens, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30053809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0644-4
_version_ 1783342448738566144
author Aljabri, Duaa
Dumitrascu, Adrian
Burton, M. Caroline
White, Launia
Khan, Mahmud
Xirasagar, Sudha
Horner, Ronnie
Naessens, James
author_facet Aljabri, Duaa
Dumitrascu, Adrian
Burton, M. Caroline
White, Launia
Khan, Mahmud
Xirasagar, Sudha
Horner, Ronnie
Naessens, James
author_sort Aljabri, Duaa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Portal use has been studied among outpatients, but its utility and impact on inpatients is unclear. This study describes portal adoption and use among hospitalized cancer patients and investigates associations with selected safety, utilization, and satisfaction measures. METHODS: A retrospective review of 4594 adult hospitalized cancer patients was conducted between 2012 and 2014 at Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida, comparing portal adopters, who registered for a portal account prior to hospitalization, with nonadopters. Adopters were classified by their portal activity during hospitalization as active or inactive inpatient users. Univariate and several logistic and linear regression models were used for analysis. RESULTS: Of total patients, 2352 (51.2%) were portal adopters, and of them, 632 (26.8%) were active inpatient users. Portal adoption was associated with patients who were young, female, married, with higher income, and had more frequent hospitalizations (P < .05). Active inpatient use was associated with patients who were young, married, nonlocals, with higher disease severity, and were hospitalized for medical treatment (P < .05). In univariate analyses, self-management knowledge scores were higher among adopters vs nonadopters (84.3 and 80.0, respectively; P = .01) and among active vs inactive inpatient users (87.0 and 83.3, respectively; P = .04). In regression models adjusted for age and disease severity, the association between portal behaviors and majority of measures were not significant (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Over half of our cancer inpatients adopted a portal prior to hospitalization, with increased adoption associated with predisposing and enabling determinants (eg: age, sex, marital status, income), and increased inpatient use associated with need (eg: nonlocal residence and disease severity). Additional research and greater effort to expand the portal functionality is needed to impact inpatient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6062873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60628732018-07-31 Patient portal adoption and use by hospitalized cancer patients: a retrospective study of its impact on adverse events, utilization, and patient satisfaction Aljabri, Duaa Dumitrascu, Adrian Burton, M. Caroline White, Launia Khan, Mahmud Xirasagar, Sudha Horner, Ronnie Naessens, James BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Portal use has been studied among outpatients, but its utility and impact on inpatients is unclear. This study describes portal adoption and use among hospitalized cancer patients and investigates associations with selected safety, utilization, and satisfaction measures. METHODS: A retrospective review of 4594 adult hospitalized cancer patients was conducted between 2012 and 2014 at Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida, comparing portal adopters, who registered for a portal account prior to hospitalization, with nonadopters. Adopters were classified by their portal activity during hospitalization as active or inactive inpatient users. Univariate and several logistic and linear regression models were used for analysis. RESULTS: Of total patients, 2352 (51.2%) were portal adopters, and of them, 632 (26.8%) were active inpatient users. Portal adoption was associated with patients who were young, female, married, with higher income, and had more frequent hospitalizations (P < .05). Active inpatient use was associated with patients who were young, married, nonlocals, with higher disease severity, and were hospitalized for medical treatment (P < .05). In univariate analyses, self-management knowledge scores were higher among adopters vs nonadopters (84.3 and 80.0, respectively; P = .01) and among active vs inactive inpatient users (87.0 and 83.3, respectively; P = .04). In regression models adjusted for age and disease severity, the association between portal behaviors and majority of measures were not significant (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Over half of our cancer inpatients adopted a portal prior to hospitalization, with increased adoption associated with predisposing and enabling determinants (eg: age, sex, marital status, income), and increased inpatient use associated with need (eg: nonlocal residence and disease severity). Additional research and greater effort to expand the portal functionality is needed to impact inpatient outcomes. BioMed Central 2018-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6062873/ /pubmed/30053809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0644-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Aljabri, Duaa
Dumitrascu, Adrian
Burton, M. Caroline
White, Launia
Khan, Mahmud
Xirasagar, Sudha
Horner, Ronnie
Naessens, James
Patient portal adoption and use by hospitalized cancer patients: a retrospective study of its impact on adverse events, utilization, and patient satisfaction
title Patient portal adoption and use by hospitalized cancer patients: a retrospective study of its impact on adverse events, utilization, and patient satisfaction
title_full Patient portal adoption and use by hospitalized cancer patients: a retrospective study of its impact on adverse events, utilization, and patient satisfaction
title_fullStr Patient portal adoption and use by hospitalized cancer patients: a retrospective study of its impact on adverse events, utilization, and patient satisfaction
title_full_unstemmed Patient portal adoption and use by hospitalized cancer patients: a retrospective study of its impact on adverse events, utilization, and patient satisfaction
title_short Patient portal adoption and use by hospitalized cancer patients: a retrospective study of its impact on adverse events, utilization, and patient satisfaction
title_sort patient portal adoption and use by hospitalized cancer patients: a retrospective study of its impact on adverse events, utilization, and patient satisfaction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30053809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0644-4
work_keys_str_mv AT aljabriduaa patientportaladoptionandusebyhospitalizedcancerpatientsaretrospectivestudyofitsimpactonadverseeventsutilizationandpatientsatisfaction
AT dumitrascuadrian patientportaladoptionandusebyhospitalizedcancerpatientsaretrospectivestudyofitsimpactonadverseeventsutilizationandpatientsatisfaction
AT burtonmcaroline patientportaladoptionandusebyhospitalizedcancerpatientsaretrospectivestudyofitsimpactonadverseeventsutilizationandpatientsatisfaction
AT whitelaunia patientportaladoptionandusebyhospitalizedcancerpatientsaretrospectivestudyofitsimpactonadverseeventsutilizationandpatientsatisfaction
AT khanmahmud patientportaladoptionandusebyhospitalizedcancerpatientsaretrospectivestudyofitsimpactonadverseeventsutilizationandpatientsatisfaction
AT xirasagarsudha patientportaladoptionandusebyhospitalizedcancerpatientsaretrospectivestudyofitsimpactonadverseeventsutilizationandpatientsatisfaction
AT hornerronnie patientportaladoptionandusebyhospitalizedcancerpatientsaretrospectivestudyofitsimpactonadverseeventsutilizationandpatientsatisfaction
AT naessensjames patientportaladoptionandusebyhospitalizedcancerpatientsaretrospectivestudyofitsimpactonadverseeventsutilizationandpatientsatisfaction