Cargando…

A Review of Corneal Collagen Cross-linking – Current Trends in Practice Applications

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on current applications of corneal Collagen Cross-Linking (CXL). METHODS: A review of publications on corneal cross-linking was conducted. This included systemic reviews, randomized controlled clinical trials, cohort studies, case-controlled studies and case serie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Li, Lim, Elizabeth Wen Ling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30123383
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874364101812010181
_version_ 1783342456693063680
author Lim, Li
Lim, Elizabeth Wen Ling
author_facet Lim, Li
Lim, Elizabeth Wen Ling
author_sort Lim, Li
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on current applications of corneal Collagen Cross-Linking (CXL). METHODS: A review of publications on corneal cross-linking was conducted. This included systemic reviews, randomized controlled clinical trials, cohort studies, case-controlled studies and case series. A summary of the publications is tabulated. RESULTS: The original indication of riboflavin – Ultraviolet-A (UVA) induced corneal collagen cross-linking is to arrest the progression of keratoconus. Studies show that it is effective in arresting the progression of keratoconus and post-LASIK ectasia with the standard Dresden protocol (epithelium-off). There are also improvements in visual, keratometric and topographic measurements over time. Severe complications of cross-linking are rare. The epithelium-on techniques have less efficacy than the Dresden protocol. Accelerated protocols have variable results, with some studies reporting comparable outcomes to the Dresden protocol while other studies reporting less efficacious outcomes. Cross-linking combined with refractive procedures provide better visual outcome but long term studies are warranted. Cross-linking for the treatment of infective keratitis is a promising new treatment modality. Initial studies show that it is more effective for superficial rather than deep infections and for bacterial rather than fungal infections. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal cross-linking is a procedure with an expanding list of indications from the treatment of corneal ectasias to infective keratitis. While the standard Dresden protocol is established as the gold standard treatment for progressive keratoconus, the more recent protocols may require further refinements, investigative and long-term studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6062907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60629072018-08-17 A Review of Corneal Collagen Cross-linking – Current Trends in Practice Applications Lim, Li Lim, Elizabeth Wen Ling Open Ophthalmol J Ophthalmology OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on current applications of corneal Collagen Cross-Linking (CXL). METHODS: A review of publications on corneal cross-linking was conducted. This included systemic reviews, randomized controlled clinical trials, cohort studies, case-controlled studies and case series. A summary of the publications is tabulated. RESULTS: The original indication of riboflavin – Ultraviolet-A (UVA) induced corneal collagen cross-linking is to arrest the progression of keratoconus. Studies show that it is effective in arresting the progression of keratoconus and post-LASIK ectasia with the standard Dresden protocol (epithelium-off). There are also improvements in visual, keratometric and topographic measurements over time. Severe complications of cross-linking are rare. The epithelium-on techniques have less efficacy than the Dresden protocol. Accelerated protocols have variable results, with some studies reporting comparable outcomes to the Dresden protocol while other studies reporting less efficacious outcomes. Cross-linking combined with refractive procedures provide better visual outcome but long term studies are warranted. Cross-linking for the treatment of infective keratitis is a promising new treatment modality. Initial studies show that it is more effective for superficial rather than deep infections and for bacterial rather than fungal infections. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal cross-linking is a procedure with an expanding list of indications from the treatment of corneal ectasias to infective keratitis. While the standard Dresden protocol is established as the gold standard treatment for progressive keratoconus, the more recent protocols may require further refinements, investigative and long-term studies. Bentham Open 2018-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6062907/ /pubmed/30123383 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874364101812010181 Text en © 2018 Lim et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Ophthalmology
Lim, Li
Lim, Elizabeth Wen Ling
A Review of Corneal Collagen Cross-linking – Current Trends in Practice Applications
title A Review of Corneal Collagen Cross-linking – Current Trends in Practice Applications
title_full A Review of Corneal Collagen Cross-linking – Current Trends in Practice Applications
title_fullStr A Review of Corneal Collagen Cross-linking – Current Trends in Practice Applications
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Corneal Collagen Cross-linking – Current Trends in Practice Applications
title_short A Review of Corneal Collagen Cross-linking – Current Trends in Practice Applications
title_sort review of corneal collagen cross-linking – current trends in practice applications
topic Ophthalmology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30123383
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874364101812010181
work_keys_str_mv AT limli areviewofcornealcollagencrosslinkingcurrenttrendsinpracticeapplications
AT limelizabethwenling areviewofcornealcollagencrosslinkingcurrenttrendsinpracticeapplications
AT limli reviewofcornealcollagencrosslinkingcurrenttrendsinpracticeapplications
AT limelizabethwenling reviewofcornealcollagencrosslinkingcurrenttrendsinpracticeapplications