Cargando…

Palliative long-term abdominal drains versus repeated drainage in individuals with untreatable ascites due to advanced cirrhosis: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: UK deaths due to chronic liver diseases such as cirrhosis have quadrupled over the last 40 years, making this condition now the third most common cause of premature death. Most patients with advanced cirrhosis (end-stage liver disease [ESLD]) develop ascites. This is often managed with d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Macken, Lucia, Mason, Louise, Evans, Catherine, Gage, Heather, Jordan, Jake, Austin, Mark, Parnell, Nick, Cooper, Max, Steer, Shani, Boles, Justine, Bremner, Stephen, Lambert, Debbie, Crook, David, Earl, Gemma, Timeyin, Jean, Verma, Sumita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30053891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2779-0
_version_ 1783342459806285824
author Macken, Lucia
Mason, Louise
Evans, Catherine
Gage, Heather
Jordan, Jake
Austin, Mark
Parnell, Nick
Cooper, Max
Steer, Shani
Boles, Justine
Bremner, Stephen
Lambert, Debbie
Crook, David
Earl, Gemma
Timeyin, Jean
Verma, Sumita
author_facet Macken, Lucia
Mason, Louise
Evans, Catherine
Gage, Heather
Jordan, Jake
Austin, Mark
Parnell, Nick
Cooper, Max
Steer, Shani
Boles, Justine
Bremner, Stephen
Lambert, Debbie
Crook, David
Earl, Gemma
Timeyin, Jean
Verma, Sumita
author_sort Macken, Lucia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: UK deaths due to chronic liver diseases such as cirrhosis have quadrupled over the last 40 years, making this condition now the third most common cause of premature death. Most patients with advanced cirrhosis (end-stage liver disease [ESLD]) develop ascites. This is often managed with diuretics, but if refractory, then the fluid is drained from the peritoneal cavity every 10–14 days by large volume paracentesis (LVP), a procedure requiring hospital admissions. As the life expectancy of patients with ESLD and refractory ascites (if ineligible for liver transplantation) is on average ≤ 6 months, frequent hospital visits are inappropriate from a palliative perspective. One alternative is long-term abdominal drains (LTADs), used successfully in patients whose ascites is due to malignancy. Although inserted in hospital, these drains allow ascites management outside of a hospital setting. LTADs have not been formally evaluated in patients with refractory ascites due to ESLD. METHODS/DESIGN: Due to uncertainty about appropriate outcome measures and whether patients with ESLD would wish or be able to participate in a study, a feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) was designed. Patients were consulted on trial design. We plan to recruit 48 patients with refractory ascites and randomise them (1:1) to either (1) LTAD or (2) current standard of care (LVP) for 12 weeks. Outcomes of interest include acceptability of the LTAD to patients, carers and healthcare professionals as well as recruitment and retention rates. The Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale, the Short Form Liver Disease Quality of Life questionnaire, the EuroQol 5 dimensions instrument and carer-reported (Zarit Burden Interview) outcomes will also be assessed. Preliminary data on cost-effectiveness will be collected, and patients and healthcare professionals will be interviewed about their experience of the trial with a view to identifying barriers to recruitment. DISCUSSION: LTADs could potentially improve end-of-life care in patients with refractory ascites due to ESLD by improving symptom control, reducing hospital visits and enabling some self-management. Our trial is designed to see if such patients can be recruited, as well as to inform the design of a subsequent definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN30697116. Registered on 7 October 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2779-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6062920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60629202018-07-31 Palliative long-term abdominal drains versus repeated drainage in individuals with untreatable ascites due to advanced cirrhosis: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial Macken, Lucia Mason, Louise Evans, Catherine Gage, Heather Jordan, Jake Austin, Mark Parnell, Nick Cooper, Max Steer, Shani Boles, Justine Bremner, Stephen Lambert, Debbie Crook, David Earl, Gemma Timeyin, Jean Verma, Sumita Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: UK deaths due to chronic liver diseases such as cirrhosis have quadrupled over the last 40 years, making this condition now the third most common cause of premature death. Most patients with advanced cirrhosis (end-stage liver disease [ESLD]) develop ascites. This is often managed with diuretics, but if refractory, then the fluid is drained from the peritoneal cavity every 10–14 days by large volume paracentesis (LVP), a procedure requiring hospital admissions. As the life expectancy of patients with ESLD and refractory ascites (if ineligible for liver transplantation) is on average ≤ 6 months, frequent hospital visits are inappropriate from a palliative perspective. One alternative is long-term abdominal drains (LTADs), used successfully in patients whose ascites is due to malignancy. Although inserted in hospital, these drains allow ascites management outside of a hospital setting. LTADs have not been formally evaluated in patients with refractory ascites due to ESLD. METHODS/DESIGN: Due to uncertainty about appropriate outcome measures and whether patients with ESLD would wish or be able to participate in a study, a feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) was designed. Patients were consulted on trial design. We plan to recruit 48 patients with refractory ascites and randomise them (1:1) to either (1) LTAD or (2) current standard of care (LVP) for 12 weeks. Outcomes of interest include acceptability of the LTAD to patients, carers and healthcare professionals as well as recruitment and retention rates. The Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale, the Short Form Liver Disease Quality of Life questionnaire, the EuroQol 5 dimensions instrument and carer-reported (Zarit Burden Interview) outcomes will also be assessed. Preliminary data on cost-effectiveness will be collected, and patients and healthcare professionals will be interviewed about their experience of the trial with a view to identifying barriers to recruitment. DISCUSSION: LTADs could potentially improve end-of-life care in patients with refractory ascites due to ESLD by improving symptom control, reducing hospital visits and enabling some self-management. Our trial is designed to see if such patients can be recruited, as well as to inform the design of a subsequent definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN30697116. Registered on 7 October 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2779-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6062920/ /pubmed/30053891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2779-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Macken, Lucia
Mason, Louise
Evans, Catherine
Gage, Heather
Jordan, Jake
Austin, Mark
Parnell, Nick
Cooper, Max
Steer, Shani
Boles, Justine
Bremner, Stephen
Lambert, Debbie
Crook, David
Earl, Gemma
Timeyin, Jean
Verma, Sumita
Palliative long-term abdominal drains versus repeated drainage in individuals with untreatable ascites due to advanced cirrhosis: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
title Palliative long-term abdominal drains versus repeated drainage in individuals with untreatable ascites due to advanced cirrhosis: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_full Palliative long-term abdominal drains versus repeated drainage in individuals with untreatable ascites due to advanced cirrhosis: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Palliative long-term abdominal drains versus repeated drainage in individuals with untreatable ascites due to advanced cirrhosis: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Palliative long-term abdominal drains versus repeated drainage in individuals with untreatable ascites due to advanced cirrhosis: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_short Palliative long-term abdominal drains versus repeated drainage in individuals with untreatable ascites due to advanced cirrhosis: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_sort palliative long-term abdominal drains versus repeated drainage in individuals with untreatable ascites due to advanced cirrhosis: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30053891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2779-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mackenlucia palliativelongtermabdominaldrainsversusrepeateddrainageinindividualswithuntreatableascitesduetoadvancedcirrhosisstudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT masonlouise palliativelongtermabdominaldrainsversusrepeateddrainageinindividualswithuntreatableascitesduetoadvancedcirrhosisstudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT evanscatherine palliativelongtermabdominaldrainsversusrepeateddrainageinindividualswithuntreatableascitesduetoadvancedcirrhosisstudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gageheather palliativelongtermabdominaldrainsversusrepeateddrainageinindividualswithuntreatableascitesduetoadvancedcirrhosisstudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jordanjake palliativelongtermabdominaldrainsversusrepeateddrainageinindividualswithuntreatableascitesduetoadvancedcirrhosisstudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT austinmark palliativelongtermabdominaldrainsversusrepeateddrainageinindividualswithuntreatableascitesduetoadvancedcirrhosisstudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT parnellnick palliativelongtermabdominaldrainsversusrepeateddrainageinindividualswithuntreatableascitesduetoadvancedcirrhosisstudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT coopermax palliativelongtermabdominaldrainsversusrepeateddrainageinindividualswithuntreatableascitesduetoadvancedcirrhosisstudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT steershani palliativelongtermabdominaldrainsversusrepeateddrainageinindividualswithuntreatableascitesduetoadvancedcirrhosisstudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bolesjustine palliativelongtermabdominaldrainsversusrepeateddrainageinindividualswithuntreatableascitesduetoadvancedcirrhosisstudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bremnerstephen palliativelongtermabdominaldrainsversusrepeateddrainageinindividualswithuntreatableascitesduetoadvancedcirrhosisstudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lambertdebbie palliativelongtermabdominaldrainsversusrepeateddrainageinindividualswithuntreatableascitesduetoadvancedcirrhosisstudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT crookdavid palliativelongtermabdominaldrainsversusrepeateddrainageinindividualswithuntreatableascitesduetoadvancedcirrhosisstudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT earlgemma palliativelongtermabdominaldrainsversusrepeateddrainageinindividualswithuntreatableascitesduetoadvancedcirrhosisstudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT timeyinjean palliativelongtermabdominaldrainsversusrepeateddrainageinindividualswithuntreatableascitesduetoadvancedcirrhosisstudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vermasumita palliativelongtermabdominaldrainsversusrepeateddrainageinindividualswithuntreatableascitesduetoadvancedcirrhosisstudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial