Cargando…

Replicability of Physical Exercise Interventions in Lung Transplant Recipients; A Systematic Review

Introduction: This systematic review aimed to assess the replicability of physical exercise interventions in lung transplantation patients. For replicability we focused on (1) the description of training principles, (2) the description of FITT components and adherence to the interventions, (3) the a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knols, Ruud H., Fischer, Nicolas, Kohlbrenner, Dario, Manettas, Anastasios, de Bruin, Eling D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30079028
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00946
_version_ 1783342469864226816
author Knols, Ruud H.
Fischer, Nicolas
Kohlbrenner, Dario
Manettas, Anastasios
de Bruin, Eling D.
author_facet Knols, Ruud H.
Fischer, Nicolas
Kohlbrenner, Dario
Manettas, Anastasios
de Bruin, Eling D.
author_sort Knols, Ruud H.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: This systematic review aimed to assess the replicability of physical exercise interventions in lung transplantation patients. For replicability we focused on (1) the description of training principles, (2) the description of FITT components and adherence to the interventions, (3) the amount of detailed information given on the physical exercise intervention, and (4) reporting the methodological quality of the included works. Methods: Relevant databases (Medline-Ovid, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Cochrane Library) were searched. Author dyads selected and systematically analyzed the included studies independent from each other. A purpose developed checklist was used to assess the details of the exercise interventions and their methodological quality. Results: From the seven included manuscripts, three described resistance training, one endurance, and three combined training approaches. All manuscripts reported specificity and initial values, six manuscripts mention progression and overload. The exercise principle reversibility was reported once and diminishing returns was not reported at all. All studies reported the type of exercise, three studies reported intensity and one study reported time for training. Not any study completely reported frequency or described adherence to the intervention. Lack of detailed reporting was identified as the cause for murky description of the interventions. The highest score for intervention description was 5 of possible 12 items. Conclusions: Replicability of many exercise interventions in LTX is not warranted due too poor descriptions of important items related to training. In particular there were insufficiently detailed reporting of training principles and FITT components in programs developed for LTX. Future interventions that aim to train LTX patients should spent effort in writing reports in which the intervention is detailed to such an extent that full replicability in clinical settings can be guaranteed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6062962
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60629622018-08-03 Replicability of Physical Exercise Interventions in Lung Transplant Recipients; A Systematic Review Knols, Ruud H. Fischer, Nicolas Kohlbrenner, Dario Manettas, Anastasios de Bruin, Eling D. Front Physiol Physiology Introduction: This systematic review aimed to assess the replicability of physical exercise interventions in lung transplantation patients. For replicability we focused on (1) the description of training principles, (2) the description of FITT components and adherence to the interventions, (3) the amount of detailed information given on the physical exercise intervention, and (4) reporting the methodological quality of the included works. Methods: Relevant databases (Medline-Ovid, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Cochrane Library) were searched. Author dyads selected and systematically analyzed the included studies independent from each other. A purpose developed checklist was used to assess the details of the exercise interventions and their methodological quality. Results: From the seven included manuscripts, three described resistance training, one endurance, and three combined training approaches. All manuscripts reported specificity and initial values, six manuscripts mention progression and overload. The exercise principle reversibility was reported once and diminishing returns was not reported at all. All studies reported the type of exercise, three studies reported intensity and one study reported time for training. Not any study completely reported frequency or described adherence to the intervention. Lack of detailed reporting was identified as the cause for murky description of the interventions. The highest score for intervention description was 5 of possible 12 items. Conclusions: Replicability of many exercise interventions in LTX is not warranted due too poor descriptions of important items related to training. In particular there were insufficiently detailed reporting of training principles and FITT components in programs developed for LTX. Future interventions that aim to train LTX patients should spent effort in writing reports in which the intervention is detailed to such an extent that full replicability in clinical settings can be guaranteed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6062962/ /pubmed/30079028 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00946 Text en Copyright © 2018 Knols, Fischer, Kohlbrenner, Manettas and de Bruin. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Knols, Ruud H.
Fischer, Nicolas
Kohlbrenner, Dario
Manettas, Anastasios
de Bruin, Eling D.
Replicability of Physical Exercise Interventions in Lung Transplant Recipients; A Systematic Review
title Replicability of Physical Exercise Interventions in Lung Transplant Recipients; A Systematic Review
title_full Replicability of Physical Exercise Interventions in Lung Transplant Recipients; A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Replicability of Physical Exercise Interventions in Lung Transplant Recipients; A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Replicability of Physical Exercise Interventions in Lung Transplant Recipients; A Systematic Review
title_short Replicability of Physical Exercise Interventions in Lung Transplant Recipients; A Systematic Review
title_sort replicability of physical exercise interventions in lung transplant recipients; a systematic review
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30079028
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00946
work_keys_str_mv AT knolsruudh replicabilityofphysicalexerciseinterventionsinlungtransplantrecipientsasystematicreview
AT fischernicolas replicabilityofphysicalexerciseinterventionsinlungtransplantrecipientsasystematicreview
AT kohlbrennerdario replicabilityofphysicalexerciseinterventionsinlungtransplantrecipientsasystematicreview
AT manettasanastasios replicabilityofphysicalexerciseinterventionsinlungtransplantrecipientsasystematicreview
AT debruinelingd replicabilityofphysicalexerciseinterventionsinlungtransplantrecipientsasystematicreview