Cargando…

Assessment of brain beta-amyloid deposition in transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease with PET imaging agents (18)F-flutemetamol and (18)F-florbetaben

BACKGROUND: Although amyloid beta (Aβ) imaging is widely used for diagnosing and monitoring Alzheimer’s disease in clinical fields, paralleling comparison between (18)F-flutemetamol and (18)F-florbetaben was rarely attempted in AD mouse model. We performed a comparison of Aβ PET images between (18)F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Son, Hye Joo, Jeong, Young Jin, Yoon, Hyun Jin, Lee, Sang Yoon, Choi, Go-Eun, Park, Ji-Ae, Kim, Min Hwan, Lee, Kyo Chul, Lee, Yong Jin, Kim, Mun Ki, Cho, Kook, Kang, Do-Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6063010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30053803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12868-018-0447-7
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Although amyloid beta (Aβ) imaging is widely used for diagnosing and monitoring Alzheimer’s disease in clinical fields, paralleling comparison between (18)F-flutemetamol and (18)F-florbetaben was rarely attempted in AD mouse model. We performed a comparison of Aβ PET images between (18)F-flutemetamol and (18)F-florbetaben in a recently developed APPswe mouse model, C57BL/6-Tg (NSE-hAPPsw) Korl. RESULTS: After an injection (0.23 mCi) of (18)F-flutemetamol and (18)F-florbetaben at a time interval of 2–3 days, we compared group difference of SUVR and kinetic parameters between the AD (n = 7) and control (n = 7) mice, as well as between (18)F-flutemetamol and (18)F-florbetaben image. In addition, bio-distribution and histopathology were conducted. With visual image and VOI-based SUVR analysis, the AD group presented more prominent uptake than did the control group in both the (18)F-florbetaben and (18)F-flutemetamol images. With kinetic analysis, the (18)F-florbetaben images showed differences in K1 and k4 between the AD and control groups, although (18)F-flutemetamol images did not show significant difference. (18)F-florbetaben images showed more prominent cortical uptake and matched well to the thioflavin S staining images than did the (18)F-flutemetamol image. In contrast, (18)F-flutemetamol images presented higher K1, k4, K1/k2 values than those of (18)F-florbetaben images. Also, (18)F-flutemetamol images presented prominent uptake in the bowel and bladder, consistent with higher bio-distribution in kidney, lung, blood and heart. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with (18)F-flutemetamol images, (18)F-florbetaben images showed prominent visual uptake intensity, SUVR, and higher correlations with the pathology. In contrast, (18)F-flutemetamol was more actively metabolized than was (18)F-florbetaben (Son et al. in J Nucl Med 58(Suppl 1):S278, 2017]. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12868-018-0447-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.