Cargando…

Comparison of base-line and chemical-induced transcriptomic responses in HepaRG and RPTEC/TERT1 cells using TempO-Seq

The utilisation of genome-wide transcriptomics has played a pivotal role in advancing the field of toxicology, allowing the mapping of transcriptional signatures to chemical exposures. These activities have uncovered several transcriptionally regulated pathways that can be utilised for assessing the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Limonciel, Alice, Ates, Gamze, Carta, Giada, Wilmes, Anja, Watzele, Manfred, Shepard, Peter J., VanSteenhouse, Harper C., Seligmann, Bruce, Yeakley, Joanne M., van de Water, Bob, Vinken, Mathieu, Jennings, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6063331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30008028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-018-2256-2
_version_ 1783342536274739200
author Limonciel, Alice
Ates, Gamze
Carta, Giada
Wilmes, Anja
Watzele, Manfred
Shepard, Peter J.
VanSteenhouse, Harper C.
Seligmann, Bruce
Yeakley, Joanne M.
van de Water, Bob
Vinken, Mathieu
Jennings, Paul
author_facet Limonciel, Alice
Ates, Gamze
Carta, Giada
Wilmes, Anja
Watzele, Manfred
Shepard, Peter J.
VanSteenhouse, Harper C.
Seligmann, Bruce
Yeakley, Joanne M.
van de Water, Bob
Vinken, Mathieu
Jennings, Paul
author_sort Limonciel, Alice
collection PubMed
description The utilisation of genome-wide transcriptomics has played a pivotal role in advancing the field of toxicology, allowing the mapping of transcriptional signatures to chemical exposures. These activities have uncovered several transcriptionally regulated pathways that can be utilised for assessing the perturbation impact of a chemical and also the identification of toxic mode of action. However, current transcriptomic platforms are not very amenable to high-throughput workflows due to, high cost, complexities in sample preparation and relatively complex bioinformatic analysis. Thus, transcriptomic investigations are usually limited in dose and time dimensions and are, therefore, not optimal for implementation in risk assessment workflows. In this study, we investigated a new cost-effective, transcriptomic assay, TempO-Seq, which alleviates the aforementioned limitations. This technique was evaluated in a 6-compound screen, utilising differentiated kidney (RPTEC/TERT1) and liver (HepaRG) cells and compared to non-transcriptomic label-free sensitive endpoints of chemical-induced disturbances, namely phase contrast morphology, xCELLigence and glycolysis. Non-proliferating cell monolayers were exposed to six sub-lethal concentrations of each compound for 24 h. The results show that utilising a 2839 gene panel, it is possible to discriminate basal tissue-specific signatures, generate dose–response relationships and to discriminate compound-specific and cell type-specific responses. This study also reiterates previous findings that chemical-induced transcriptomic alterations occur prior to cytotoxicity and that transcriptomics provides in depth mechanistic information of the effects of chemicals on cellular transcriptional responses. TempO-Seq is a robust transcriptomic platform that is well suited for in vitro toxicity experiments. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00204-018-2256-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6063331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60633312018-08-09 Comparison of base-line and chemical-induced transcriptomic responses in HepaRG and RPTEC/TERT1 cells using TempO-Seq Limonciel, Alice Ates, Gamze Carta, Giada Wilmes, Anja Watzele, Manfred Shepard, Peter J. VanSteenhouse, Harper C. Seligmann, Bruce Yeakley, Joanne M. van de Water, Bob Vinken, Mathieu Jennings, Paul Arch Toxicol Toxicogenomics The utilisation of genome-wide transcriptomics has played a pivotal role in advancing the field of toxicology, allowing the mapping of transcriptional signatures to chemical exposures. These activities have uncovered several transcriptionally regulated pathways that can be utilised for assessing the perturbation impact of a chemical and also the identification of toxic mode of action. However, current transcriptomic platforms are not very amenable to high-throughput workflows due to, high cost, complexities in sample preparation and relatively complex bioinformatic analysis. Thus, transcriptomic investigations are usually limited in dose and time dimensions and are, therefore, not optimal for implementation in risk assessment workflows. In this study, we investigated a new cost-effective, transcriptomic assay, TempO-Seq, which alleviates the aforementioned limitations. This technique was evaluated in a 6-compound screen, utilising differentiated kidney (RPTEC/TERT1) and liver (HepaRG) cells and compared to non-transcriptomic label-free sensitive endpoints of chemical-induced disturbances, namely phase contrast morphology, xCELLigence and glycolysis. Non-proliferating cell monolayers were exposed to six sub-lethal concentrations of each compound for 24 h. The results show that utilising a 2839 gene panel, it is possible to discriminate basal tissue-specific signatures, generate dose–response relationships and to discriminate compound-specific and cell type-specific responses. This study also reiterates previous findings that chemical-induced transcriptomic alterations occur prior to cytotoxicity and that transcriptomics provides in depth mechanistic information of the effects of chemicals on cellular transcriptional responses. TempO-Seq is a robust transcriptomic platform that is well suited for in vitro toxicity experiments. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00204-018-2256-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-07-14 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6063331/ /pubmed/30008028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-018-2256-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Toxicogenomics
Limonciel, Alice
Ates, Gamze
Carta, Giada
Wilmes, Anja
Watzele, Manfred
Shepard, Peter J.
VanSteenhouse, Harper C.
Seligmann, Bruce
Yeakley, Joanne M.
van de Water, Bob
Vinken, Mathieu
Jennings, Paul
Comparison of base-line and chemical-induced transcriptomic responses in HepaRG and RPTEC/TERT1 cells using TempO-Seq
title Comparison of base-line and chemical-induced transcriptomic responses in HepaRG and RPTEC/TERT1 cells using TempO-Seq
title_full Comparison of base-line and chemical-induced transcriptomic responses in HepaRG and RPTEC/TERT1 cells using TempO-Seq
title_fullStr Comparison of base-line and chemical-induced transcriptomic responses in HepaRG and RPTEC/TERT1 cells using TempO-Seq
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of base-line and chemical-induced transcriptomic responses in HepaRG and RPTEC/TERT1 cells using TempO-Seq
title_short Comparison of base-line and chemical-induced transcriptomic responses in HepaRG and RPTEC/TERT1 cells using TempO-Seq
title_sort comparison of base-line and chemical-induced transcriptomic responses in heparg and rptec/tert1 cells using tempo-seq
topic Toxicogenomics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6063331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30008028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-018-2256-2
work_keys_str_mv AT limoncielalice comparisonofbaselineandchemicalinducedtranscriptomicresponsesinhepargandrptectert1cellsusingtemposeq
AT atesgamze comparisonofbaselineandchemicalinducedtranscriptomicresponsesinhepargandrptectert1cellsusingtemposeq
AT cartagiada comparisonofbaselineandchemicalinducedtranscriptomicresponsesinhepargandrptectert1cellsusingtemposeq
AT wilmesanja comparisonofbaselineandchemicalinducedtranscriptomicresponsesinhepargandrptectert1cellsusingtemposeq
AT watzelemanfred comparisonofbaselineandchemicalinducedtranscriptomicresponsesinhepargandrptectert1cellsusingtemposeq
AT shepardpeterj comparisonofbaselineandchemicalinducedtranscriptomicresponsesinhepargandrptectert1cellsusingtemposeq
AT vansteenhouseharperc comparisonofbaselineandchemicalinducedtranscriptomicresponsesinhepargandrptectert1cellsusingtemposeq
AT seligmannbruce comparisonofbaselineandchemicalinducedtranscriptomicresponsesinhepargandrptectert1cellsusingtemposeq
AT yeakleyjoannem comparisonofbaselineandchemicalinducedtranscriptomicresponsesinhepargandrptectert1cellsusingtemposeq
AT vandewaterbob comparisonofbaselineandchemicalinducedtranscriptomicresponsesinhepargandrptectert1cellsusingtemposeq
AT vinkenmathieu comparisonofbaselineandchemicalinducedtranscriptomicresponsesinhepargandrptectert1cellsusingtemposeq
AT jenningspaul comparisonofbaselineandchemicalinducedtranscriptomicresponsesinhepargandrptectert1cellsusingtemposeq