Cargando…

Tracking facility-based perinatal deaths in Tanzania: Results from an indicator validation assessment

BACKGROUND: Globally, an estimated 2.7 million babies die in the neonatal period annually, and of these, about 0.7 million die from intrapartum-related events. In Tanzania 51,000 newborn deaths and 43,000 stillbirths occur every year. Approximately two-thirds of these deaths could be potentially pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plotkin, Marya, Bishanga, Dunstan, Kidanto, Hussein, Jennings, Mary Carol, Ricca, Jim, Mwanamsangu, Amasha, Tibaijuka, Gaudiosa, Lemwayi, Ruth, Ngereza, Benny, Drake, Mary, Zougrana, Jeremie, Khadka, Neena, Litch, James A., Rawlins, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6063433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30052662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201238
_version_ 1783342555808661504
author Plotkin, Marya
Bishanga, Dunstan
Kidanto, Hussein
Jennings, Mary Carol
Ricca, Jim
Mwanamsangu, Amasha
Tibaijuka, Gaudiosa
Lemwayi, Ruth
Ngereza, Benny
Drake, Mary
Zougrana, Jeremie
Khadka, Neena
Litch, James A.
Rawlins, Barbara
author_facet Plotkin, Marya
Bishanga, Dunstan
Kidanto, Hussein
Jennings, Mary Carol
Ricca, Jim
Mwanamsangu, Amasha
Tibaijuka, Gaudiosa
Lemwayi, Ruth
Ngereza, Benny
Drake, Mary
Zougrana, Jeremie
Khadka, Neena
Litch, James A.
Rawlins, Barbara
author_sort Plotkin, Marya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Globally, an estimated 2.7 million babies die in the neonatal period annually, and of these, about 0.7 million die from intrapartum-related events. In Tanzania 51,000 newborn deaths and 43,000 stillbirths occur every year. Approximately two-thirds of these deaths could be potentially prevented with improvements in intrapartum and neonatal care. Routine measurement of fetal intrapartum deaths and newborn deaths that occur in health facilities can help to evaluate efforts to improve the quality of intrapartum care to save lives. However, few examples exist of indicators on perinatal mortality in the facility setting that are readily available through health management information systems (HMIS). METHODS: From November 2016 to April 2017, health providers at 10 government health facilities in Kagera region, Tanzania, underwent refresher training on perinatal death classification and training on the use of handheld Doppler devices to assess fetal heart rate upon admission to maternity services. Doppler devices were provided to maternity services at the study facilities. We assessed the validity of an indicator to measure facility-based pre-discharge perinatal mortality by comparing perinatal outcomes extracted from the HMIS maternity registers to a gold standard perinatal death audit. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of the HMIS neonatal outcomes to predict gold standard audit outcomes were both over 98% based on analysis of 128 HMIS–gold standard audit pairs. After this validation, we calculated facility perinatal mortality indicator from HMIS data using fresh stillbirths and pre-discharge newborn death as the numerator and women admitted in labor with positive fetal heart tones as the denominator. Further emphasizing the validity of the indicator, FPM values aligned with expected mortality by facility level, with lowest rates in health centers (range 0.3%– 0.5%), compared to district hospitals (1.5%– 2.9%) and the regional hospital (4.2%). CONCLUSION: This facility perinatal mortality indicator provides an important health outcome measure that facilities can use to monitor levels of perinatal deaths occurring in the facility and evaluate impact of quality of care improvement activities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6063433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60634332018-08-09 Tracking facility-based perinatal deaths in Tanzania: Results from an indicator validation assessment Plotkin, Marya Bishanga, Dunstan Kidanto, Hussein Jennings, Mary Carol Ricca, Jim Mwanamsangu, Amasha Tibaijuka, Gaudiosa Lemwayi, Ruth Ngereza, Benny Drake, Mary Zougrana, Jeremie Khadka, Neena Litch, James A. Rawlins, Barbara PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Globally, an estimated 2.7 million babies die in the neonatal period annually, and of these, about 0.7 million die from intrapartum-related events. In Tanzania 51,000 newborn deaths and 43,000 stillbirths occur every year. Approximately two-thirds of these deaths could be potentially prevented with improvements in intrapartum and neonatal care. Routine measurement of fetal intrapartum deaths and newborn deaths that occur in health facilities can help to evaluate efforts to improve the quality of intrapartum care to save lives. However, few examples exist of indicators on perinatal mortality in the facility setting that are readily available through health management information systems (HMIS). METHODS: From November 2016 to April 2017, health providers at 10 government health facilities in Kagera region, Tanzania, underwent refresher training on perinatal death classification and training on the use of handheld Doppler devices to assess fetal heart rate upon admission to maternity services. Doppler devices were provided to maternity services at the study facilities. We assessed the validity of an indicator to measure facility-based pre-discharge perinatal mortality by comparing perinatal outcomes extracted from the HMIS maternity registers to a gold standard perinatal death audit. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of the HMIS neonatal outcomes to predict gold standard audit outcomes were both over 98% based on analysis of 128 HMIS–gold standard audit pairs. After this validation, we calculated facility perinatal mortality indicator from HMIS data using fresh stillbirths and pre-discharge newborn death as the numerator and women admitted in labor with positive fetal heart tones as the denominator. Further emphasizing the validity of the indicator, FPM values aligned with expected mortality by facility level, with lowest rates in health centers (range 0.3%– 0.5%), compared to district hospitals (1.5%– 2.9%) and the regional hospital (4.2%). CONCLUSION: This facility perinatal mortality indicator provides an important health outcome measure that facilities can use to monitor levels of perinatal deaths occurring in the facility and evaluate impact of quality of care improvement activities. Public Library of Science 2018-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6063433/ /pubmed/30052662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201238 Text en © 2018 Plotkin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Plotkin, Marya
Bishanga, Dunstan
Kidanto, Hussein
Jennings, Mary Carol
Ricca, Jim
Mwanamsangu, Amasha
Tibaijuka, Gaudiosa
Lemwayi, Ruth
Ngereza, Benny
Drake, Mary
Zougrana, Jeremie
Khadka, Neena
Litch, James A.
Rawlins, Barbara
Tracking facility-based perinatal deaths in Tanzania: Results from an indicator validation assessment
title Tracking facility-based perinatal deaths in Tanzania: Results from an indicator validation assessment
title_full Tracking facility-based perinatal deaths in Tanzania: Results from an indicator validation assessment
title_fullStr Tracking facility-based perinatal deaths in Tanzania: Results from an indicator validation assessment
title_full_unstemmed Tracking facility-based perinatal deaths in Tanzania: Results from an indicator validation assessment
title_short Tracking facility-based perinatal deaths in Tanzania: Results from an indicator validation assessment
title_sort tracking facility-based perinatal deaths in tanzania: results from an indicator validation assessment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6063433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30052662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201238
work_keys_str_mv AT plotkinmarya trackingfacilitybasedperinataldeathsintanzaniaresultsfromanindicatorvalidationassessment
AT bishangadunstan trackingfacilitybasedperinataldeathsintanzaniaresultsfromanindicatorvalidationassessment
AT kidantohussein trackingfacilitybasedperinataldeathsintanzaniaresultsfromanindicatorvalidationassessment
AT jenningsmarycarol trackingfacilitybasedperinataldeathsintanzaniaresultsfromanindicatorvalidationassessment
AT riccajim trackingfacilitybasedperinataldeathsintanzaniaresultsfromanindicatorvalidationassessment
AT mwanamsanguamasha trackingfacilitybasedperinataldeathsintanzaniaresultsfromanindicatorvalidationassessment
AT tibaijukagaudiosa trackingfacilitybasedperinataldeathsintanzaniaresultsfromanindicatorvalidationassessment
AT lemwayiruth trackingfacilitybasedperinataldeathsintanzaniaresultsfromanindicatorvalidationassessment
AT ngerezabenny trackingfacilitybasedperinataldeathsintanzaniaresultsfromanindicatorvalidationassessment
AT drakemary trackingfacilitybasedperinataldeathsintanzaniaresultsfromanindicatorvalidationassessment
AT zougranajeremie trackingfacilitybasedperinataldeathsintanzaniaresultsfromanindicatorvalidationassessment
AT khadkaneena trackingfacilitybasedperinataldeathsintanzaniaresultsfromanindicatorvalidationassessment
AT litchjamesa trackingfacilitybasedperinataldeathsintanzaniaresultsfromanindicatorvalidationassessment
AT rawlinsbarbara trackingfacilitybasedperinataldeathsintanzaniaresultsfromanindicatorvalidationassessment