Cargando…
Integrative omics analyses broaden treatment targets in human cancer
BACKGROUND: Although large-scale, next-generation sequencing (NGS) studies of cancers hold promise for enabling precision oncology, challenges remain in integrating NGS with clinically validated biomarkers. METHODS: To overcome such challenges, we utilized the Database of Evidence for Precision Onco...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30053901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-018-0564-z |
_version_ | 1783342652765241344 |
---|---|
author | Sengupta, Sohini Sun, Sam Q. Huang, Kuan-lin Oh, Clara Bailey, Matthew H. Varghese, Rajees Wyczalkowski, Matthew A. Ning, Jie Tripathi, Piyush McMichael, Joshua F. Johnson, Kimberly J. Kandoth, Cyriac Welch, John Ma, Cynthia Wendl, Michael C. Payne, Samuel H. Fenyö, David Townsend, Reid R. Dipersio, John F. Chen, Feng Ding, Li |
author_facet | Sengupta, Sohini Sun, Sam Q. Huang, Kuan-lin Oh, Clara Bailey, Matthew H. Varghese, Rajees Wyczalkowski, Matthew A. Ning, Jie Tripathi, Piyush McMichael, Joshua F. Johnson, Kimberly J. Kandoth, Cyriac Welch, John Ma, Cynthia Wendl, Michael C. Payne, Samuel H. Fenyö, David Townsend, Reid R. Dipersio, John F. Chen, Feng Ding, Li |
author_sort | Sengupta, Sohini |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although large-scale, next-generation sequencing (NGS) studies of cancers hold promise for enabling precision oncology, challenges remain in integrating NGS with clinically validated biomarkers. METHODS: To overcome such challenges, we utilized the Database of Evidence for Precision Oncology (DEPO) to link druggability to genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic biomarkers. Using a pan-cancer cohort of 6570 tumors, we identified tumors with potentially druggable biomarkers consisting of drug-associated mutations, mRNA expression outliers, and protein/phosphoprotein expression outliers identified by DEPO. RESULTS: Within the pan-cancer cohort of 6570 tumors, we found that 3% are druggable based on FDA-approved drug-mutation interactions in specific cancer types. However, mRNA/phosphoprotein/protein expression outliers and drug repurposing across cancer types suggest potential druggability in up to 16% of tumors. The percentage of potential drug-associated tumors can increase to 48% if we consider preclinical evidence. Further, our analyses showed co-occurring potentially druggable multi-omics alterations in 32% of tumors, indicating a role for individualized combinational therapy, with evidence supporting mTOR/PI3K/ESR1 co-inhibition and BRAF/AKT co-inhibition in 1.6 and 0.8% of tumors, respectively. We experimentally validated a subset of putative druggable mutations in BRAF identified by a protein structure-based computational tool. Finally, analysis of a large-scale drug screening dataset lent further evidence supporting repurposing of drugs across cancer types and the use of expression outliers for inferring druggability. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that an integrated analysis platform can nominate multi-omics alterations as biomarkers of druggability and aid ongoing efforts to bring precision oncology to patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13073-018-0564-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6064051 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60640512018-07-31 Integrative omics analyses broaden treatment targets in human cancer Sengupta, Sohini Sun, Sam Q. Huang, Kuan-lin Oh, Clara Bailey, Matthew H. Varghese, Rajees Wyczalkowski, Matthew A. Ning, Jie Tripathi, Piyush McMichael, Joshua F. Johnson, Kimberly J. Kandoth, Cyriac Welch, John Ma, Cynthia Wendl, Michael C. Payne, Samuel H. Fenyö, David Townsend, Reid R. Dipersio, John F. Chen, Feng Ding, Li Genome Med Research BACKGROUND: Although large-scale, next-generation sequencing (NGS) studies of cancers hold promise for enabling precision oncology, challenges remain in integrating NGS with clinically validated biomarkers. METHODS: To overcome such challenges, we utilized the Database of Evidence for Precision Oncology (DEPO) to link druggability to genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic biomarkers. Using a pan-cancer cohort of 6570 tumors, we identified tumors with potentially druggable biomarkers consisting of drug-associated mutations, mRNA expression outliers, and protein/phosphoprotein expression outliers identified by DEPO. RESULTS: Within the pan-cancer cohort of 6570 tumors, we found that 3% are druggable based on FDA-approved drug-mutation interactions in specific cancer types. However, mRNA/phosphoprotein/protein expression outliers and drug repurposing across cancer types suggest potential druggability in up to 16% of tumors. The percentage of potential drug-associated tumors can increase to 48% if we consider preclinical evidence. Further, our analyses showed co-occurring potentially druggable multi-omics alterations in 32% of tumors, indicating a role for individualized combinational therapy, with evidence supporting mTOR/PI3K/ESR1 co-inhibition and BRAF/AKT co-inhibition in 1.6 and 0.8% of tumors, respectively. We experimentally validated a subset of putative druggable mutations in BRAF identified by a protein structure-based computational tool. Finally, analysis of a large-scale drug screening dataset lent further evidence supporting repurposing of drugs across cancer types and the use of expression outliers for inferring druggability. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that an integrated analysis platform can nominate multi-omics alterations as biomarkers of druggability and aid ongoing efforts to bring precision oncology to patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13073-018-0564-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6064051/ /pubmed/30053901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-018-0564-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Sengupta, Sohini Sun, Sam Q. Huang, Kuan-lin Oh, Clara Bailey, Matthew H. Varghese, Rajees Wyczalkowski, Matthew A. Ning, Jie Tripathi, Piyush McMichael, Joshua F. Johnson, Kimberly J. Kandoth, Cyriac Welch, John Ma, Cynthia Wendl, Michael C. Payne, Samuel H. Fenyö, David Townsend, Reid R. Dipersio, John F. Chen, Feng Ding, Li Integrative omics analyses broaden treatment targets in human cancer |
title | Integrative omics analyses broaden treatment targets in human cancer |
title_full | Integrative omics analyses broaden treatment targets in human cancer |
title_fullStr | Integrative omics analyses broaden treatment targets in human cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Integrative omics analyses broaden treatment targets in human cancer |
title_short | Integrative omics analyses broaden treatment targets in human cancer |
title_sort | integrative omics analyses broaden treatment targets in human cancer |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30053901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-018-0564-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT senguptasohini integrativeomicsanalysesbroadentreatmenttargetsinhumancancer AT sunsamq integrativeomicsanalysesbroadentreatmenttargetsinhumancancer AT huangkuanlin integrativeomicsanalysesbroadentreatmenttargetsinhumancancer AT ohclara integrativeomicsanalysesbroadentreatmenttargetsinhumancancer AT baileymatthewh integrativeomicsanalysesbroadentreatmenttargetsinhumancancer AT vargheserajees integrativeomicsanalysesbroadentreatmenttargetsinhumancancer AT wyczalkowskimatthewa integrativeomicsanalysesbroadentreatmenttargetsinhumancancer AT ningjie integrativeomicsanalysesbroadentreatmenttargetsinhumancancer AT tripathipiyush integrativeomicsanalysesbroadentreatmenttargetsinhumancancer AT mcmichaeljoshuaf integrativeomicsanalysesbroadentreatmenttargetsinhumancancer AT johnsonkimberlyj integrativeomicsanalysesbroadentreatmenttargetsinhumancancer AT kandothcyriac integrativeomicsanalysesbroadentreatmenttargetsinhumancancer AT welchjohn integrativeomicsanalysesbroadentreatmenttargetsinhumancancer AT macynthia integrativeomicsanalysesbroadentreatmenttargetsinhumancancer AT wendlmichaelc integrativeomicsanalysesbroadentreatmenttargetsinhumancancer AT paynesamuelh integrativeomicsanalysesbroadentreatmenttargetsinhumancancer AT fenyodavid integrativeomicsanalysesbroadentreatmenttargetsinhumancancer AT townsendreidr integrativeomicsanalysesbroadentreatmenttargetsinhumancancer AT dipersiojohnf integrativeomicsanalysesbroadentreatmenttargetsinhumancancer AT chenfeng integrativeomicsanalysesbroadentreatmenttargetsinhumancancer AT dingli integrativeomicsanalysesbroadentreatmenttargetsinhumancancer |