Cargando…

Cognitive and emotional alterations in App knock-in mouse models of Aβ amyloidosis

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common cause of dementia, is characterized by the progressive deposition of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides and neurofibrillary tangles. Mouse models of Aβ amyloidosis generated by knock-in (KI) of a humanized Aβ sequence provide distinct advantages over tradit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sakakibara, Yasufumi, Sekiya, Michiko, Saito, Takashi, Saido, Takaomi C., Iijima, Koichi M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30055565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12868-018-0446-8
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common cause of dementia, is characterized by the progressive deposition of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides and neurofibrillary tangles. Mouse models of Aβ amyloidosis generated by knock-in (KI) of a humanized Aβ sequence provide distinct advantages over traditional transgenic models that rely on overexpression of amyloid precursor protein (APP). In App-KI mice, three familial AD-associated mutations were introduced into the endogenous mouse App locus to recapitulate Aβ pathology observed in AD: the Swedish (NL) mutation, which elevates total Aβ production; the Beyreuther/Iberian (F) mutation, which increases the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio; and the Arctic (G) mutation, which promotes Aβ aggregation. App(NL-G-F) mice harbor all three mutations and develop progressive Aβ amyloidosis and neuroinflammatory response in broader brain areas, whereas App(NL) mice carrying only the Swedish mutation exhibit no overt AD-related pathological changes. To identify behavioral alterations associated with Aβ pathology, we assessed emotional and cognitive domains of App(NL-G-F) and App(NL) mice at different time points, using the elevated plus maze, contextual fear conditioning, and Barnes maze tasks. RESULTS: Assessments of emotional domains revealed that, in comparison with wild-type (WT) C57BL/6J mice, App(NL-G-F/NL-G-F) mice exhibited anxiolytic-like behavior that was detectable from 6 months of age. By contrast, App(NL/NL) mice exhibited anxiogenic-like behavior from 15 months of age. In the contextual fear conditioning task, both App(NL/NL) and App(NL-G-F/NL-G-F) mice exhibited intact learning and memory up to 15–18 months of age, whereas App(NL-G-F/NL-G-F) mice exhibited hyper-reactivity to painful stimuli. In the Barnes maze task, App(NL-G-F/NL-G-F) mice exhibited a subtle decline in spatial learning ability at 8 months of age, but retained normal memory functions. CONCLUSION: App(NL/NL) and App(NL-G-F/NL-G-F) mice exhibit behavioral changes associated with non-cognitive, emotional domains before the onset of definitive cognitive deficits. Our observations consistently indicate that App(NL-G-F/NL-G-F) mice represent a model for preclinical AD. These mice are useful for the study of AD prevention rather than treatment after neurodegeneration. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12868-018-0446-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.