Cargando…
A pilot study in intraparenchymal therapy delivery in the prostate: a comparison of delivery with a porous needle vs standard needle
BACKGROUND: New biologic therapies directly injected into the prostate are in clinical trials for prostatic diseases. There is a need to understand distribution of injected therapies as a function of prostatic anatomy, physiology, and device design. METHODS: A needle with a porous length of customiz...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30055610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0378-8 |
_version_ | 1783342672168091648 |
---|---|
author | Brady, Martin L. Coffield, King Scott Kuehl, Thomas J. Raghavan, Raghu Speights, V. O. Patel, Belur Wilson, Scott Wilson, Mike Odland, Rick M. |
author_facet | Brady, Martin L. Coffield, King Scott Kuehl, Thomas J. Raghavan, Raghu Speights, V. O. Patel, Belur Wilson, Scott Wilson, Mike Odland, Rick M. |
author_sort | Brady, Martin L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: New biologic therapies directly injected into the prostate are in clinical trials for prostatic diseases. There is a need to understand distribution of injected therapies as a function of prostatic anatomy, physiology, and device design. METHODS: A needle with a porous length of customizable-length was tested and its performance compared with a standard needle. Injections of magnetic resonance contrast reagent were placed into ex-vivo human prostates after surgical excision in standard of care therapy for invasive bladder cancer patients. Magnetic resonance images were acquired using sequences to quantify volume delivered, distributed, and backflow. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance images analysis revealed heterogeneity distribution with injection into the specimens. There was low resistance to flow along ductal pathways and high resistance to flow into glandular nodules and smooth muscle/fibrous parenchyma. Data confirm previous studies showing injection loss via urethra backflow, urethra, and prostatic ducts. Tissue fraction of dose was significantly higher with porous needle compared with standard needle (p = .03). We found that a greater volume of distribution divided by the amount infused (Vd/Vi) increased by 80% with the porous needle, though no statistically significant association due to small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that prostatic tissue is anatomically heterogenic and limits distribution of needle injection. There is greater distribution in the ex-vivo prostate using a porous needle. The complexity of intra prostatic flow pathways suggests preoperative imaging and pre-treatment planning will enhance therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12894-018-0378-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6064133 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60641332018-08-01 A pilot study in intraparenchymal therapy delivery in the prostate: a comparison of delivery with a porous needle vs standard needle Brady, Martin L. Coffield, King Scott Kuehl, Thomas J. Raghavan, Raghu Speights, V. O. Patel, Belur Wilson, Scott Wilson, Mike Odland, Rick M. BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: New biologic therapies directly injected into the prostate are in clinical trials for prostatic diseases. There is a need to understand distribution of injected therapies as a function of prostatic anatomy, physiology, and device design. METHODS: A needle with a porous length of customizable-length was tested and its performance compared with a standard needle. Injections of magnetic resonance contrast reagent were placed into ex-vivo human prostates after surgical excision in standard of care therapy for invasive bladder cancer patients. Magnetic resonance images were acquired using sequences to quantify volume delivered, distributed, and backflow. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance images analysis revealed heterogeneity distribution with injection into the specimens. There was low resistance to flow along ductal pathways and high resistance to flow into glandular nodules and smooth muscle/fibrous parenchyma. Data confirm previous studies showing injection loss via urethra backflow, urethra, and prostatic ducts. Tissue fraction of dose was significantly higher with porous needle compared with standard needle (p = .03). We found that a greater volume of distribution divided by the amount infused (Vd/Vi) increased by 80% with the porous needle, though no statistically significant association due to small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that prostatic tissue is anatomically heterogenic and limits distribution of needle injection. There is greater distribution in the ex-vivo prostate using a porous needle. The complexity of intra prostatic flow pathways suggests preoperative imaging and pre-treatment planning will enhance therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12894-018-0378-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6064133/ /pubmed/30055610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0378-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Brady, Martin L. Coffield, King Scott Kuehl, Thomas J. Raghavan, Raghu Speights, V. O. Patel, Belur Wilson, Scott Wilson, Mike Odland, Rick M. A pilot study in intraparenchymal therapy delivery in the prostate: a comparison of delivery with a porous needle vs standard needle |
title | A pilot study in intraparenchymal therapy delivery in the prostate: a comparison of delivery with a porous needle vs standard needle |
title_full | A pilot study in intraparenchymal therapy delivery in the prostate: a comparison of delivery with a porous needle vs standard needle |
title_fullStr | A pilot study in intraparenchymal therapy delivery in the prostate: a comparison of delivery with a porous needle vs standard needle |
title_full_unstemmed | A pilot study in intraparenchymal therapy delivery in the prostate: a comparison of delivery with a porous needle vs standard needle |
title_short | A pilot study in intraparenchymal therapy delivery in the prostate: a comparison of delivery with a porous needle vs standard needle |
title_sort | pilot study in intraparenchymal therapy delivery in the prostate: a comparison of delivery with a porous needle vs standard needle |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30055610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0378-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bradymartinl apilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle AT coffieldkingscott apilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle AT kuehlthomasj apilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle AT raghavanraghu apilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle AT speightsvo apilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle AT patelbelur apilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle AT wilsonscott apilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle AT wilsonmike apilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle AT odlandrickm apilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle AT bradymartinl pilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle AT coffieldkingscott pilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle AT kuehlthomasj pilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle AT raghavanraghu pilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle AT speightsvo pilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle AT patelbelur pilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle AT wilsonscott pilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle AT wilsonmike pilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle AT odlandrickm pilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle |