Cargando…

A pilot study in intraparenchymal therapy delivery in the prostate: a comparison of delivery with a porous needle vs standard needle

BACKGROUND: New biologic therapies directly injected into the prostate are in clinical trials for prostatic diseases. There is a need to understand distribution of injected therapies as a function of prostatic anatomy, physiology, and device design. METHODS: A needle with a porous length of customiz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brady, Martin L., Coffield, King Scott, Kuehl, Thomas J., Raghavan, Raghu, Speights, V. O., Patel, Belur, Wilson, Scott, Wilson, Mike, Odland, Rick M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30055610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0378-8
_version_ 1783342672168091648
author Brady, Martin L.
Coffield, King Scott
Kuehl, Thomas J.
Raghavan, Raghu
Speights, V. O.
Patel, Belur
Wilson, Scott
Wilson, Mike
Odland, Rick M.
author_facet Brady, Martin L.
Coffield, King Scott
Kuehl, Thomas J.
Raghavan, Raghu
Speights, V. O.
Patel, Belur
Wilson, Scott
Wilson, Mike
Odland, Rick M.
author_sort Brady, Martin L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: New biologic therapies directly injected into the prostate are in clinical trials for prostatic diseases. There is a need to understand distribution of injected therapies as a function of prostatic anatomy, physiology, and device design. METHODS: A needle with a porous length of customizable-length was tested and its performance compared with a standard needle. Injections of magnetic resonance contrast reagent were placed into ex-vivo human prostates after surgical excision in standard of care therapy for invasive bladder cancer patients. Magnetic resonance images were acquired using sequences to quantify volume delivered, distributed, and backflow. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance images analysis revealed heterogeneity distribution with injection into the specimens. There was low resistance to flow along ductal pathways and high resistance to flow into glandular nodules and smooth muscle/fibrous parenchyma. Data confirm previous studies showing injection loss via urethra backflow, urethra, and prostatic ducts. Tissue fraction of dose was significantly higher with porous needle compared with standard needle (p = .03). We found that a greater volume of distribution divided by the amount infused (Vd/Vi) increased by 80% with the porous needle, though no statistically significant association due to small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that prostatic tissue is anatomically heterogenic and limits distribution of needle injection. There is greater distribution in the ex-vivo prostate using a porous needle. The complexity of intra prostatic flow pathways suggests preoperative imaging and pre-treatment planning will enhance therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12894-018-0378-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6064133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60641332018-08-01 A pilot study in intraparenchymal therapy delivery in the prostate: a comparison of delivery with a porous needle vs standard needle Brady, Martin L. Coffield, King Scott Kuehl, Thomas J. Raghavan, Raghu Speights, V. O. Patel, Belur Wilson, Scott Wilson, Mike Odland, Rick M. BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: New biologic therapies directly injected into the prostate are in clinical trials for prostatic diseases. There is a need to understand distribution of injected therapies as a function of prostatic anatomy, physiology, and device design. METHODS: A needle with a porous length of customizable-length was tested and its performance compared with a standard needle. Injections of magnetic resonance contrast reagent were placed into ex-vivo human prostates after surgical excision in standard of care therapy for invasive bladder cancer patients. Magnetic resonance images were acquired using sequences to quantify volume delivered, distributed, and backflow. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance images analysis revealed heterogeneity distribution with injection into the specimens. There was low resistance to flow along ductal pathways and high resistance to flow into glandular nodules and smooth muscle/fibrous parenchyma. Data confirm previous studies showing injection loss via urethra backflow, urethra, and prostatic ducts. Tissue fraction of dose was significantly higher with porous needle compared with standard needle (p = .03). We found that a greater volume of distribution divided by the amount infused (Vd/Vi) increased by 80% with the porous needle, though no statistically significant association due to small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that prostatic tissue is anatomically heterogenic and limits distribution of needle injection. There is greater distribution in the ex-vivo prostate using a porous needle. The complexity of intra prostatic flow pathways suggests preoperative imaging and pre-treatment planning will enhance therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12894-018-0378-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6064133/ /pubmed/30055610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0378-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brady, Martin L.
Coffield, King Scott
Kuehl, Thomas J.
Raghavan, Raghu
Speights, V. O.
Patel, Belur
Wilson, Scott
Wilson, Mike
Odland, Rick M.
A pilot study in intraparenchymal therapy delivery in the prostate: a comparison of delivery with a porous needle vs standard needle
title A pilot study in intraparenchymal therapy delivery in the prostate: a comparison of delivery with a porous needle vs standard needle
title_full A pilot study in intraparenchymal therapy delivery in the prostate: a comparison of delivery with a porous needle vs standard needle
title_fullStr A pilot study in intraparenchymal therapy delivery in the prostate: a comparison of delivery with a porous needle vs standard needle
title_full_unstemmed A pilot study in intraparenchymal therapy delivery in the prostate: a comparison of delivery with a porous needle vs standard needle
title_short A pilot study in intraparenchymal therapy delivery in the prostate: a comparison of delivery with a porous needle vs standard needle
title_sort pilot study in intraparenchymal therapy delivery in the prostate: a comparison of delivery with a porous needle vs standard needle
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30055610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0378-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bradymartinl apilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle
AT coffieldkingscott apilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle
AT kuehlthomasj apilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle
AT raghavanraghu apilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle
AT speightsvo apilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle
AT patelbelur apilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle
AT wilsonscott apilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle
AT wilsonmike apilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle
AT odlandrickm apilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle
AT bradymartinl pilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle
AT coffieldkingscott pilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle
AT kuehlthomasj pilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle
AT raghavanraghu pilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle
AT speightsvo pilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle
AT patelbelur pilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle
AT wilsonscott pilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle
AT wilsonmike pilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle
AT odlandrickm pilotstudyinintraparenchymaltherapydeliveryintheprostateacomparisonofdeliverywithaporousneedlevsstandardneedle