Cargando…

Characterization of the Open-Label Lead-In Period of Two Randomized Controlled Phase 3 Trials Evaluating Dapagliflozin, Saxagliptin, and Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes

INTRODUCTION: To examine the utility of sequential versus dual add-on approaches in patients who have type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control with metformin therapy alone, we characterized the efficacy and safety of dual therapy with dapagliflozin or saxagliptin added to metformin in the ope...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mathieu, Chantal, Catrinoiu, Doina, Ranetti, Aurelian Emil, Johnsson, Eva, Hansen, Lars, Chen, Hungta, Garcia-Sanchez, Ricardo, Iqbal, Nayyar, Celiñski, Aleksander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29802530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0445-x
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: To examine the utility of sequential versus dual add-on approaches in patients who have type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control with metformin therapy alone, we characterized the efficacy and safety of dual therapy with dapagliflozin or saxagliptin added to metformin in the open-label lead-in periods of two phase 3 trials (study 1, NCT01619059; study 2, NCT01646320) that evaluated triple therapy in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes. METHODS: During the lead-in periods of each trial, patients [glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 8.0–11.5%] who had been receiving metformin ≥ 1500 mg/day for ≥ 8 weeks received metformin immediate release at an equivalent dose plus dapagliflozin 10 mg/day (study 1; N = 482) or saxagliptin 5 mg/day (study 2; N = 349) for 16 weeks. Efficacy end points were assessed at week − 2 before randomization. RESULTS: Mean change in HbA1c [95% confidence interval (CI)] from lead-in baseline (study 1, 9.3%; study 2, 9.4%) was − 1.6% (− 1.7, − 1.5) in study 1 and − 1.3% (− 1.5, − 1.2) in study 2. Mean changes (95% CI) from lead-in baseline in weight and fasting plasma glucose were − 2.4 kg (− 2.6, − 2.1) and − 47.5 mg/dL (− 52.8, − 42.3) for study 1 and − 0.5 kg (− 0.8, − 0.2) and − 28.5 mg/dL (− 35.8, − 21.2) for study 2. At the end of the lead-in period, 22.0% of patients achieved HbA1c < 7.0% in study 1 and 17.5% in study 2. Dual therapy was well tolerated, with hypoglycemia incidence < 1% in both studies. CONCLUSION: Dual therapy improved glycemic control and was well tolerated; however, most patients required additional therapy to further improve HbA1c towards target, suggesting that an early move to triple therapy with oral glucose-lowering drugs rather than a stepwise approach may be beneficial for patients with high HbA1c levels on metformin therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01619059, NCT01646320. FUNDING: AstraZeneca. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-018-0445-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.