Cargando…

Cardiovascular Safety of Empagliflozin Versus Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Comparisons

INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) treated with glucose-lowering drugs and examining cardiovascular-related outcomes have yielded mixed results. In this work, we aimed to assess the relative treatment effects of empagliflozin versus sitagliptin and saxagl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balijepalli, Chakrapani, Shirali, Rohan, Kandaswamy, Prashanth, Ustyugova, Anastasia, Pfarr, Egon, Lund, Søren S., Druyts, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29949014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0456-7
_version_ 1783342725151588352
author Balijepalli, Chakrapani
Shirali, Rohan
Kandaswamy, Prashanth
Ustyugova, Anastasia
Pfarr, Egon
Lund, Søren S.
Druyts, Eric
author_facet Balijepalli, Chakrapani
Shirali, Rohan
Kandaswamy, Prashanth
Ustyugova, Anastasia
Pfarr, Egon
Lund, Søren S.
Druyts, Eric
author_sort Balijepalli, Chakrapani
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) treated with glucose-lowering drugs and examining cardiovascular-related outcomes have yielded mixed results. In this work, we aimed to assess the relative treatment effects of empagliflozin versus sitagliptin and saxagliptin (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors) on cardiovascular-related outcomes in patients with T2DM. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review to identify clinical trials assessing cardiovascular-related outcomes for sitagliptin-, saxagliptin-, and empagliflozin-treated patients with T2DM. A network meta-analysis of indirect treatment comparisons was conducted in a Bayesian framework. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% credible intervals (CrI) were computed for six cardiovascular-related outcomes to estimate the relative efficacies of these agents. RESULTS: Empagliflozin showed a statistically significant superiority over saxagliptin (HR 0.60; 95% CrI 0.46–0.80) and sitagliptin (HR 0.60; 95% CrI 0.46–0.79) to reduce the risk for cardiovascular-related mortality. For all-cause mortality, empagliflozin showed a statistically significant risk reduction compared to saxagliptin (HR 0.61; 95% CrI 0.49–0.76) and sitagliptin (HR 0.67; 95% CrI 0.54–0.83). A similar pattern was observed in the risk reduction for hospitalization due to heart failure, where empagliflozin was found to be statistically significantly superior to saxagliptin (HR 0.51; 95% CrI 0.37–0.70) and sitagliptin (HR 0.65; 95% CrI 0.47–0.90). Empagliflozin was not statistically significantly different to sitagliptin and saxagliptin with regard to the risk of a composite endpoint composed of death, stroke or myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: In this indirect comparison to the DPP-4 inhibitors saxagliptin and sitagliptin, empagliflozin significantly lowered the risk of cardiovascular-related mortality, all-cause mortality and hospitalizations due to heart failure. FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-018-0456-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6064600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60646002018-08-10 Cardiovascular Safety of Empagliflozin Versus Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Comparisons Balijepalli, Chakrapani Shirali, Rohan Kandaswamy, Prashanth Ustyugova, Anastasia Pfarr, Egon Lund, Søren S. Druyts, Eric Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) treated with glucose-lowering drugs and examining cardiovascular-related outcomes have yielded mixed results. In this work, we aimed to assess the relative treatment effects of empagliflozin versus sitagliptin and saxagliptin (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors) on cardiovascular-related outcomes in patients with T2DM. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review to identify clinical trials assessing cardiovascular-related outcomes for sitagliptin-, saxagliptin-, and empagliflozin-treated patients with T2DM. A network meta-analysis of indirect treatment comparisons was conducted in a Bayesian framework. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% credible intervals (CrI) were computed for six cardiovascular-related outcomes to estimate the relative efficacies of these agents. RESULTS: Empagliflozin showed a statistically significant superiority over saxagliptin (HR 0.60; 95% CrI 0.46–0.80) and sitagliptin (HR 0.60; 95% CrI 0.46–0.79) to reduce the risk for cardiovascular-related mortality. For all-cause mortality, empagliflozin showed a statistically significant risk reduction compared to saxagliptin (HR 0.61; 95% CrI 0.49–0.76) and sitagliptin (HR 0.67; 95% CrI 0.54–0.83). A similar pattern was observed in the risk reduction for hospitalization due to heart failure, where empagliflozin was found to be statistically significantly superior to saxagliptin (HR 0.51; 95% CrI 0.37–0.70) and sitagliptin (HR 0.65; 95% CrI 0.47–0.90). Empagliflozin was not statistically significantly different to sitagliptin and saxagliptin with regard to the risk of a composite endpoint composed of death, stroke or myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: In this indirect comparison to the DPP-4 inhibitors saxagliptin and sitagliptin, empagliflozin significantly lowered the risk of cardiovascular-related mortality, all-cause mortality and hospitalizations due to heart failure. FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-018-0456-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2018-06-12 2018-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6064600/ /pubmed/29949014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0456-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Balijepalli, Chakrapani
Shirali, Rohan
Kandaswamy, Prashanth
Ustyugova, Anastasia
Pfarr, Egon
Lund, Søren S.
Druyts, Eric
Cardiovascular Safety of Empagliflozin Versus Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Comparisons
title Cardiovascular Safety of Empagliflozin Versus Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Comparisons
title_full Cardiovascular Safety of Empagliflozin Versus Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Comparisons
title_fullStr Cardiovascular Safety of Empagliflozin Versus Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Comparisons
title_full_unstemmed Cardiovascular Safety of Empagliflozin Versus Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Comparisons
title_short Cardiovascular Safety of Empagliflozin Versus Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Comparisons
title_sort cardiovascular safety of empagliflozin versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (dpp-4) inhibitors in type 2 diabetes: systematic literature review and indirect comparisons
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29949014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0456-7
work_keys_str_mv AT balijepallichakrapani cardiovascularsafetyofempagliflozinversusdipeptidylpeptidase4dpp4inhibitorsintype2diabetessystematicliteraturereviewandindirectcomparisons
AT shiralirohan cardiovascularsafetyofempagliflozinversusdipeptidylpeptidase4dpp4inhibitorsintype2diabetessystematicliteraturereviewandindirectcomparisons
AT kandaswamyprashanth cardiovascularsafetyofempagliflozinversusdipeptidylpeptidase4dpp4inhibitorsintype2diabetessystematicliteraturereviewandindirectcomparisons
AT ustyugovaanastasia cardiovascularsafetyofempagliflozinversusdipeptidylpeptidase4dpp4inhibitorsintype2diabetessystematicliteraturereviewandindirectcomparisons
AT pfarregon cardiovascularsafetyofempagliflozinversusdipeptidylpeptidase4dpp4inhibitorsintype2diabetessystematicliteraturereviewandindirectcomparisons
AT lundsørens cardiovascularsafetyofempagliflozinversusdipeptidylpeptidase4dpp4inhibitorsintype2diabetessystematicliteraturereviewandindirectcomparisons
AT druytseric cardiovascularsafetyofempagliflozinversusdipeptidylpeptidase4dpp4inhibitorsintype2diabetessystematicliteraturereviewandindirectcomparisons