Cargando…
Cardiovascular Safety of Empagliflozin Versus Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Comparisons
INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) treated with glucose-lowering drugs and examining cardiovascular-related outcomes have yielded mixed results. In this work, we aimed to assess the relative treatment effects of empagliflozin versus sitagliptin and saxagl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29949014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0456-7 |
_version_ | 1783342725151588352 |
---|---|
author | Balijepalli, Chakrapani Shirali, Rohan Kandaswamy, Prashanth Ustyugova, Anastasia Pfarr, Egon Lund, Søren S. Druyts, Eric |
author_facet | Balijepalli, Chakrapani Shirali, Rohan Kandaswamy, Prashanth Ustyugova, Anastasia Pfarr, Egon Lund, Søren S. Druyts, Eric |
author_sort | Balijepalli, Chakrapani |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) treated with glucose-lowering drugs and examining cardiovascular-related outcomes have yielded mixed results. In this work, we aimed to assess the relative treatment effects of empagliflozin versus sitagliptin and saxagliptin (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors) on cardiovascular-related outcomes in patients with T2DM. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review to identify clinical trials assessing cardiovascular-related outcomes for sitagliptin-, saxagliptin-, and empagliflozin-treated patients with T2DM. A network meta-analysis of indirect treatment comparisons was conducted in a Bayesian framework. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% credible intervals (CrI) were computed for six cardiovascular-related outcomes to estimate the relative efficacies of these agents. RESULTS: Empagliflozin showed a statistically significant superiority over saxagliptin (HR 0.60; 95% CrI 0.46–0.80) and sitagliptin (HR 0.60; 95% CrI 0.46–0.79) to reduce the risk for cardiovascular-related mortality. For all-cause mortality, empagliflozin showed a statistically significant risk reduction compared to saxagliptin (HR 0.61; 95% CrI 0.49–0.76) and sitagliptin (HR 0.67; 95% CrI 0.54–0.83). A similar pattern was observed in the risk reduction for hospitalization due to heart failure, where empagliflozin was found to be statistically significantly superior to saxagliptin (HR 0.51; 95% CrI 0.37–0.70) and sitagliptin (HR 0.65; 95% CrI 0.47–0.90). Empagliflozin was not statistically significantly different to sitagliptin and saxagliptin with regard to the risk of a composite endpoint composed of death, stroke or myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: In this indirect comparison to the DPP-4 inhibitors saxagliptin and sitagliptin, empagliflozin significantly lowered the risk of cardiovascular-related mortality, all-cause mortality and hospitalizations due to heart failure. FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-018-0456-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6064600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60646002018-08-10 Cardiovascular Safety of Empagliflozin Versus Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Comparisons Balijepalli, Chakrapani Shirali, Rohan Kandaswamy, Prashanth Ustyugova, Anastasia Pfarr, Egon Lund, Søren S. Druyts, Eric Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) treated with glucose-lowering drugs and examining cardiovascular-related outcomes have yielded mixed results. In this work, we aimed to assess the relative treatment effects of empagliflozin versus sitagliptin and saxagliptin (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors) on cardiovascular-related outcomes in patients with T2DM. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review to identify clinical trials assessing cardiovascular-related outcomes for sitagliptin-, saxagliptin-, and empagliflozin-treated patients with T2DM. A network meta-analysis of indirect treatment comparisons was conducted in a Bayesian framework. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% credible intervals (CrI) were computed for six cardiovascular-related outcomes to estimate the relative efficacies of these agents. RESULTS: Empagliflozin showed a statistically significant superiority over saxagliptin (HR 0.60; 95% CrI 0.46–0.80) and sitagliptin (HR 0.60; 95% CrI 0.46–0.79) to reduce the risk for cardiovascular-related mortality. For all-cause mortality, empagliflozin showed a statistically significant risk reduction compared to saxagliptin (HR 0.61; 95% CrI 0.49–0.76) and sitagliptin (HR 0.67; 95% CrI 0.54–0.83). A similar pattern was observed in the risk reduction for hospitalization due to heart failure, where empagliflozin was found to be statistically significantly superior to saxagliptin (HR 0.51; 95% CrI 0.37–0.70) and sitagliptin (HR 0.65; 95% CrI 0.47–0.90). Empagliflozin was not statistically significantly different to sitagliptin and saxagliptin with regard to the risk of a composite endpoint composed of death, stroke or myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: In this indirect comparison to the DPP-4 inhibitors saxagliptin and sitagliptin, empagliflozin significantly lowered the risk of cardiovascular-related mortality, all-cause mortality and hospitalizations due to heart failure. FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-018-0456-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2018-06-12 2018-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6064600/ /pubmed/29949014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0456-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Balijepalli, Chakrapani Shirali, Rohan Kandaswamy, Prashanth Ustyugova, Anastasia Pfarr, Egon Lund, Søren S. Druyts, Eric Cardiovascular Safety of Empagliflozin Versus Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Comparisons |
title | Cardiovascular Safety of Empagliflozin Versus Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Comparisons |
title_full | Cardiovascular Safety of Empagliflozin Versus Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Comparisons |
title_fullStr | Cardiovascular Safety of Empagliflozin Versus Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Comparisons |
title_full_unstemmed | Cardiovascular Safety of Empagliflozin Versus Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Comparisons |
title_short | Cardiovascular Safety of Empagliflozin Versus Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Comparisons |
title_sort | cardiovascular safety of empagliflozin versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (dpp-4) inhibitors in type 2 diabetes: systematic literature review and indirect comparisons |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29949014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0456-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balijepallichakrapani cardiovascularsafetyofempagliflozinversusdipeptidylpeptidase4dpp4inhibitorsintype2diabetessystematicliteraturereviewandindirectcomparisons AT shiralirohan cardiovascularsafetyofempagliflozinversusdipeptidylpeptidase4dpp4inhibitorsintype2diabetessystematicliteraturereviewandindirectcomparisons AT kandaswamyprashanth cardiovascularsafetyofempagliflozinversusdipeptidylpeptidase4dpp4inhibitorsintype2diabetessystematicliteraturereviewandindirectcomparisons AT ustyugovaanastasia cardiovascularsafetyofempagliflozinversusdipeptidylpeptidase4dpp4inhibitorsintype2diabetessystematicliteraturereviewandindirectcomparisons AT pfarregon cardiovascularsafetyofempagliflozinversusdipeptidylpeptidase4dpp4inhibitorsintype2diabetessystematicliteraturereviewandindirectcomparisons AT lundsørens cardiovascularsafetyofempagliflozinversusdipeptidylpeptidase4dpp4inhibitorsintype2diabetessystematicliteraturereviewandindirectcomparisons AT druytseric cardiovascularsafetyofempagliflozinversusdipeptidylpeptidase4dpp4inhibitorsintype2diabetessystematicliteraturereviewandindirectcomparisons |