Cargando…

Experimental investigation of the effects of acute exercise on memory interference

Background: Among other factors, including the decay theory, interfering stimuli (proactive and retroactive interference; PI and RI) may influence the encoding and consolidation of target information. Acute exercise can enhance episodic memory function, but no experiments have evaluated whether exer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wingate, Savanna, Crawford, Lindsay, Frith, Emily, Loprinzi, Paul D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087844
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/hpp.2018.28
_version_ 1783342749787881472
author Wingate, Savanna
Crawford, Lindsay
Frith, Emily
Loprinzi, Paul D.
author_facet Wingate, Savanna
Crawford, Lindsay
Frith, Emily
Loprinzi, Paul D.
author_sort Wingate, Savanna
collection PubMed
description Background: Among other factors, including the decay theory, interfering stimuli (proactive and retroactive interference; PI and RI) may influence the encoding and consolidation of target information. Acute exercise can enhance episodic memory function, but no experiments have evaluated whether exercise can attenuate PI and RI effects on memory, which was the purpose of this experiment. Methods: Twenty young adults were randomized (via computer program) into one of 6 experimental groups (N=120, n=20 per group), including 3 PI (G1, G2, and G3) and 3 RI groups (G4, G5, and G6). Those in G1 and G4 exercised prior to a 10-list AB/AC paradigm with interference; G2 and G5 did not exercise but had interference; and G3 and G6 were the control groups with no exercise and no interference. Results: The mean (95% CI) number of correctly recalled word pairs across the 6 respective groups was 2.4 (1.2-3.5), 2.4 (1.3-3.5), 5.1 (3.9-6.3), 6.9 (5.7-8.0), 5.0 (4.2-5.8), and 6.1 (5.1-6.9) (FANOVA=11.7; P<0.001; η2=0.33). For PI, the control group (group 3) correctly recalled more word pairs (5.1) when compared to the exercise interference group (2.4; group 1) or the non-exercise interference group (2.4; group 2). The difference between group 1 and 3 (2.4 vs.5.1) was significant (P=0.003), as was group 2 vs. 3 (P=0.002). For the RI groups (groups 4-6),group 4 differed from group 5 (6.9 vs. 5.0; P=0.01), but there was no difference between group 4 and group 6 (P=0.25) or group 5 and group 6 (P=0.09). Conclusion: These preliminary findings suggest that acute exercise may be more beneficial for RI compared to PI, but additional experimental work is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6064757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60647572018-08-07 Experimental investigation of the effects of acute exercise on memory interference Wingate, Savanna Crawford, Lindsay Frith, Emily Loprinzi, Paul D. Health Promot Perspect Original Article Background: Among other factors, including the decay theory, interfering stimuli (proactive and retroactive interference; PI and RI) may influence the encoding and consolidation of target information. Acute exercise can enhance episodic memory function, but no experiments have evaluated whether exercise can attenuate PI and RI effects on memory, which was the purpose of this experiment. Methods: Twenty young adults were randomized (via computer program) into one of 6 experimental groups (N=120, n=20 per group), including 3 PI (G1, G2, and G3) and 3 RI groups (G4, G5, and G6). Those in G1 and G4 exercised prior to a 10-list AB/AC paradigm with interference; G2 and G5 did not exercise but had interference; and G3 and G6 were the control groups with no exercise and no interference. Results: The mean (95% CI) number of correctly recalled word pairs across the 6 respective groups was 2.4 (1.2-3.5), 2.4 (1.3-3.5), 5.1 (3.9-6.3), 6.9 (5.7-8.0), 5.0 (4.2-5.8), and 6.1 (5.1-6.9) (FANOVA=11.7; P<0.001; η2=0.33). For PI, the control group (group 3) correctly recalled more word pairs (5.1) when compared to the exercise interference group (2.4; group 1) or the non-exercise interference group (2.4; group 2). The difference between group 1 and 3 (2.4 vs.5.1) was significant (P=0.003), as was group 2 vs. 3 (P=0.002). For the RI groups (groups 4-6),group 4 differed from group 5 (6.9 vs. 5.0; P=0.01), but there was no difference between group 4 and group 6 (P=0.25) or group 5 and group 6 (P=0.09). Conclusion: These preliminary findings suggest that acute exercise may be more beneficial for RI compared to PI, but additional experimental work is needed. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2018-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6064757/ /pubmed/30087844 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/hpp.2018.28 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wingate, Savanna
Crawford, Lindsay
Frith, Emily
Loprinzi, Paul D.
Experimental investigation of the effects of acute exercise on memory interference
title Experimental investigation of the effects of acute exercise on memory interference
title_full Experimental investigation of the effects of acute exercise on memory interference
title_fullStr Experimental investigation of the effects of acute exercise on memory interference
title_full_unstemmed Experimental investigation of the effects of acute exercise on memory interference
title_short Experimental investigation of the effects of acute exercise on memory interference
title_sort experimental investigation of the effects of acute exercise on memory interference
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087844
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/hpp.2018.28
work_keys_str_mv AT wingatesavanna experimentalinvestigationoftheeffectsofacuteexerciseonmemoryinterference
AT crawfordlindsay experimentalinvestigationoftheeffectsofacuteexerciseonmemoryinterference
AT frithemily experimentalinvestigationoftheeffectsofacuteexerciseonmemoryinterference
AT loprinzipauld experimentalinvestigationoftheeffectsofacuteexerciseonmemoryinterference