Cargando…
Optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease
BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-culprit lesions is beneficial for prognosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease. However, the optimal timing of staged revascularization is still controvers...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Science Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30083188 http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.05.005 |
_version_ | 1783342753457897472 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Xue–Dong Zhao, Guan–Qi Wang, Xiao Shi, Shu–Tian Zheng, Wen Guo, Rui–Feng Nie, Shao–Ping |
author_facet | Zhao, Xue–Dong Zhao, Guan–Qi Wang, Xiao Shi, Shu–Tian Zheng, Wen Guo, Rui–Feng Nie, Shao–Ping |
author_sort | Zhao, Xue–Dong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-culprit lesions is beneficial for prognosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease. However, the optimal timing of staged revascularization is still controversial. This study aimed to find the optimal timing of staged revascularization. METHODS: A total of 428 STEMI patients with multivessel disease who underwent primary PCI and staged PCI were included. According to the time interval between primary and staged PCI, patients were divided into three groups (≤ 1 week, 1–2 weeks, and 2–12 weeks after primary PCI). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal re-infarction, repeat revascularization, and stroke. Cox regression model was used to assess the association between staged PCI timing and risk of MACE. RESULTS: During the follow-up, 119 participants had MACEs. There was statistical difference in MACE incidence among the three groups (≤ 1 week: 23.0%; 1–2 weeks: 33.0%; 2–12 weeks: 40.0%; P = 0.001). In the multivariable adjustment model, the timing interval of staged PCI ≤ 1 week and 1–2 weeks were both significantly associated with a lower risk of MACE [hazard ratio (HR): 0.40, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.24–0.65; HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.31–0.93, respectively], mainly attributed to a lower risk of repeat revascularization (HR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.24–0.70; HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.18–0.7), compared with a strategy of 2–12 weeks later of primary PCI. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal timing of staged PCI for non-culprit vessels should be within two weeks after primary PCI for STEMI patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6064773 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Science Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60647732018-08-06 Optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease Zhao, Xue–Dong Zhao, Guan–Qi Wang, Xiao Shi, Shu–Tian Zheng, Wen Guo, Rui–Feng Nie, Shao–Ping J Geriatr Cardiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-culprit lesions is beneficial for prognosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease. However, the optimal timing of staged revascularization is still controversial. This study aimed to find the optimal timing of staged revascularization. METHODS: A total of 428 STEMI patients with multivessel disease who underwent primary PCI and staged PCI were included. According to the time interval between primary and staged PCI, patients were divided into three groups (≤ 1 week, 1–2 weeks, and 2–12 weeks after primary PCI). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal re-infarction, repeat revascularization, and stroke. Cox regression model was used to assess the association between staged PCI timing and risk of MACE. RESULTS: During the follow-up, 119 participants had MACEs. There was statistical difference in MACE incidence among the three groups (≤ 1 week: 23.0%; 1–2 weeks: 33.0%; 2–12 weeks: 40.0%; P = 0.001). In the multivariable adjustment model, the timing interval of staged PCI ≤ 1 week and 1–2 weeks were both significantly associated with a lower risk of MACE [hazard ratio (HR): 0.40, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.24–0.65; HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.31–0.93, respectively], mainly attributed to a lower risk of repeat revascularization (HR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.24–0.70; HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.18–0.7), compared with a strategy of 2–12 weeks later of primary PCI. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal timing of staged PCI for non-culprit vessels should be within two weeks after primary PCI for STEMI patients. Science Press 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6064773/ /pubmed/30083188 http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.05.005 Text en Institute of Geriatric Cardiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which allows readers to alter, transform, or build upon the article and then distribute the resulting work under the same or similar license to this one. The work must be attributed back to the original author and commercial use is not permitted without specific permission. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhao, Xue–Dong Zhao, Guan–Qi Wang, Xiao Shi, Shu–Tian Zheng, Wen Guo, Rui–Feng Nie, Shao–Ping Optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease |
title | Optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease |
title_full | Optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease |
title_fullStr | Optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease |
title_short | Optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease |
title_sort | optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention in st-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30083188 http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.05.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaoxuedong optimaltimingofstagedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientswithmultivesseldisease AT zhaoguanqi optimaltimingofstagedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientswithmultivesseldisease AT wangxiao optimaltimingofstagedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientswithmultivesseldisease AT shishutian optimaltimingofstagedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientswithmultivesseldisease AT zhengwen optimaltimingofstagedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientswithmultivesseldisease AT guoruifeng optimaltimingofstagedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientswithmultivesseldisease AT nieshaoping optimaltimingofstagedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientswithmultivesseldisease |