Cargando…

Optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-culprit lesions is beneficial for prognosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease. However, the optimal timing of staged revascularization is still controvers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Xue–Dong, Zhao, Guan–Qi, Wang, Xiao, Shi, Shu–Tian, Zheng, Wen, Guo, Rui–Feng, Nie, Shao–Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Science Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30083188
http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.05.005
_version_ 1783342753457897472
author Zhao, Xue–Dong
Zhao, Guan–Qi
Wang, Xiao
Shi, Shu–Tian
Zheng, Wen
Guo, Rui–Feng
Nie, Shao–Ping
author_facet Zhao, Xue–Dong
Zhao, Guan–Qi
Wang, Xiao
Shi, Shu–Tian
Zheng, Wen
Guo, Rui–Feng
Nie, Shao–Ping
author_sort Zhao, Xue–Dong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-culprit lesions is beneficial for prognosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease. However, the optimal timing of staged revascularization is still controversial. This study aimed to find the optimal timing of staged revascularization. METHODS: A total of 428 STEMI patients with multivessel disease who underwent primary PCI and staged PCI were included. According to the time interval between primary and staged PCI, patients were divided into three groups (≤ 1 week, 1–2 weeks, and 2–12 weeks after primary PCI). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal re-infarction, repeat revascularization, and stroke. Cox regression model was used to assess the association between staged PCI timing and risk of MACE. RESULTS: During the follow-up, 119 participants had MACEs. There was statistical difference in MACE incidence among the three groups (≤ 1 week: 23.0%; 1–2 weeks: 33.0%; 2–12 weeks: 40.0%; P = 0.001). In the multivariable adjustment model, the timing interval of staged PCI ≤ 1 week and 1–2 weeks were both significantly associated with a lower risk of MACE [hazard ratio (HR): 0.40, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.24–0.65; HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.31–0.93, respectively], mainly attributed to a lower risk of repeat revascularization (HR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.24–0.70; HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.18–0.7), compared with a strategy of 2–12 weeks later of primary PCI. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal timing of staged PCI for non-culprit vessels should be within two weeks after primary PCI for STEMI patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6064773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Science Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60647732018-08-06 Optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease Zhao, Xue–Dong Zhao, Guan–Qi Wang, Xiao Shi, Shu–Tian Zheng, Wen Guo, Rui–Feng Nie, Shao–Ping J Geriatr Cardiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-culprit lesions is beneficial for prognosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease. However, the optimal timing of staged revascularization is still controversial. This study aimed to find the optimal timing of staged revascularization. METHODS: A total of 428 STEMI patients with multivessel disease who underwent primary PCI and staged PCI were included. According to the time interval between primary and staged PCI, patients were divided into three groups (≤ 1 week, 1–2 weeks, and 2–12 weeks after primary PCI). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal re-infarction, repeat revascularization, and stroke. Cox regression model was used to assess the association between staged PCI timing and risk of MACE. RESULTS: During the follow-up, 119 participants had MACEs. There was statistical difference in MACE incidence among the three groups (≤ 1 week: 23.0%; 1–2 weeks: 33.0%; 2–12 weeks: 40.0%; P = 0.001). In the multivariable adjustment model, the timing interval of staged PCI ≤ 1 week and 1–2 weeks were both significantly associated with a lower risk of MACE [hazard ratio (HR): 0.40, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.24–0.65; HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.31–0.93, respectively], mainly attributed to a lower risk of repeat revascularization (HR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.24–0.70; HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.18–0.7), compared with a strategy of 2–12 weeks later of primary PCI. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal timing of staged PCI for non-culprit vessels should be within two weeks after primary PCI for STEMI patients. Science Press 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6064773/ /pubmed/30083188 http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.05.005 Text en Institute of Geriatric Cardiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which allows readers to alter, transform, or build upon the article and then distribute the resulting work under the same or similar license to this one. The work must be attributed back to the original author and commercial use is not permitted without specific permission.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhao, Xue–Dong
Zhao, Guan–Qi
Wang, Xiao
Shi, Shu–Tian
Zheng, Wen
Guo, Rui–Feng
Nie, Shao–Ping
Optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease
title Optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease
title_full Optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease
title_fullStr Optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease
title_full_unstemmed Optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease
title_short Optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease
title_sort optimal timing of staged percutaneous coronary intervention in st-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30083188
http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.05.005
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoxuedong optimaltimingofstagedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientswithmultivesseldisease
AT zhaoguanqi optimaltimingofstagedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientswithmultivesseldisease
AT wangxiao optimaltimingofstagedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientswithmultivesseldisease
AT shishutian optimaltimingofstagedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientswithmultivesseldisease
AT zhengwen optimaltimingofstagedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientswithmultivesseldisease
AT guoruifeng optimaltimingofstagedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientswithmultivesseldisease
AT nieshaoping optimaltimingofstagedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionpatientswithmultivesseldisease