Cargando…

Improving Delivery of Secondary Prophylaxis for Rheumatic Heart Disease in a High‐Burden Setting: Outcome of a Stepped‐Wedge, Community, Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND: Health system strengthening is needed to improve delivery of secondary prophylaxis against rheumatic heart disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We undertook a stepped‐wedge, randomized trial in northern Australia. Five pairs of Indigenous community clinics entered the study at 3‐month steps. St...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ralph, Anna P., de Dassel, Jessica L., Kirby, Adrienne, Read, Clancy, Mitchell, Alison G., Maguire, Graeme P., Currie, Bart J., Bailie, Ross S., Johnston, Vanessa, Carapetis, Jonathan R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30018165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009308
_version_ 1783342761371500544
author Ralph, Anna P.
de Dassel, Jessica L.
Kirby, Adrienne
Read, Clancy
Mitchell, Alison G.
Maguire, Graeme P.
Currie, Bart J.
Bailie, Ross S.
Johnston, Vanessa
Carapetis, Jonathan R.
author_facet Ralph, Anna P.
de Dassel, Jessica L.
Kirby, Adrienne
Read, Clancy
Mitchell, Alison G.
Maguire, Graeme P.
Currie, Bart J.
Bailie, Ross S.
Johnston, Vanessa
Carapetis, Jonathan R.
author_sort Ralph, Anna P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health system strengthening is needed to improve delivery of secondary prophylaxis against rheumatic heart disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We undertook a stepped‐wedge, randomized trial in northern Australia. Five pairs of Indigenous community clinics entered the study at 3‐month steps. Study phases comprised a 12 month baseline phase, 3 month transition phase, 12 month intensive phase and a 3‐ to 12‐month maintenance phase. Clinics received a multicomponent intervention supporting activities to improve penicillin delivery, aligned with the chronic care model, with continuous quality‐improvement feedback on adherence. The primary outcome was the proportion receiving ≥80% of scheduled penicillin injections. Secondary outcomes included “days at risk” of acute rheumatic fever recurrence related to late penicillin and acute rheumatic fever recurrence rates. Overall, 304 patients requiring prophylaxis were eligible. The proportion receiving ≥80% of scheduled injections during baseline was 141 of 304 (46%)—higher than anticipated. No effect attributable to the study was evident: in the intensive phase, 126 of 304 (41%) received ≥80% of scheduled injections (odds ratio compared with baseline: 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.54–1.11). There was modest improvement in the maintenance phase among high‐adhering patients (43% received ≥90% of injections versus 30% [baseline] and 28% [intensive], P<0.001). Also, the proportion of days at risk in the whole cohort decreased in the maintenance phase (0.28 versus 0.32 [baseline] and 0.34 [intensive], P=0.001). Acute rheumatic fever recurrence rates did not differ between study sites during the intensive phase and the whole jurisdiction (3.0 versus 3.5 recurrences per 100 patient‐years, P=0.65). CONCLUSIONS: This strategy did not improve adherence to rheumatic heart disease secondary prophylaxis within the study time frame. Longer term primary care strengthening strategies are needed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.anzctr.org.au. Unique identifier: ACTRN12613000223730.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6064833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60648332018-08-07 Improving Delivery of Secondary Prophylaxis for Rheumatic Heart Disease in a High‐Burden Setting: Outcome of a Stepped‐Wedge, Community, Randomized Trial Ralph, Anna P. de Dassel, Jessica L. Kirby, Adrienne Read, Clancy Mitchell, Alison G. Maguire, Graeme P. Currie, Bart J. Bailie, Ross S. Johnston, Vanessa Carapetis, Jonathan R. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Health system strengthening is needed to improve delivery of secondary prophylaxis against rheumatic heart disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We undertook a stepped‐wedge, randomized trial in northern Australia. Five pairs of Indigenous community clinics entered the study at 3‐month steps. Study phases comprised a 12 month baseline phase, 3 month transition phase, 12 month intensive phase and a 3‐ to 12‐month maintenance phase. Clinics received a multicomponent intervention supporting activities to improve penicillin delivery, aligned with the chronic care model, with continuous quality‐improvement feedback on adherence. The primary outcome was the proportion receiving ≥80% of scheduled penicillin injections. Secondary outcomes included “days at risk” of acute rheumatic fever recurrence related to late penicillin and acute rheumatic fever recurrence rates. Overall, 304 patients requiring prophylaxis were eligible. The proportion receiving ≥80% of scheduled injections during baseline was 141 of 304 (46%)—higher than anticipated. No effect attributable to the study was evident: in the intensive phase, 126 of 304 (41%) received ≥80% of scheduled injections (odds ratio compared with baseline: 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.54–1.11). There was modest improvement in the maintenance phase among high‐adhering patients (43% received ≥90% of injections versus 30% [baseline] and 28% [intensive], P<0.001). Also, the proportion of days at risk in the whole cohort decreased in the maintenance phase (0.28 versus 0.32 [baseline] and 0.34 [intensive], P=0.001). Acute rheumatic fever recurrence rates did not differ between study sites during the intensive phase and the whole jurisdiction (3.0 versus 3.5 recurrences per 100 patient‐years, P=0.65). CONCLUSIONS: This strategy did not improve adherence to rheumatic heart disease secondary prophylaxis within the study time frame. Longer term primary care strengthening strategies are needed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.anzctr.org.au. Unique identifier: ACTRN12613000223730. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6064833/ /pubmed/30018165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009308 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ralph, Anna P.
de Dassel, Jessica L.
Kirby, Adrienne
Read, Clancy
Mitchell, Alison G.
Maguire, Graeme P.
Currie, Bart J.
Bailie, Ross S.
Johnston, Vanessa
Carapetis, Jonathan R.
Improving Delivery of Secondary Prophylaxis for Rheumatic Heart Disease in a High‐Burden Setting: Outcome of a Stepped‐Wedge, Community, Randomized Trial
title Improving Delivery of Secondary Prophylaxis for Rheumatic Heart Disease in a High‐Burden Setting: Outcome of a Stepped‐Wedge, Community, Randomized Trial
title_full Improving Delivery of Secondary Prophylaxis for Rheumatic Heart Disease in a High‐Burden Setting: Outcome of a Stepped‐Wedge, Community, Randomized Trial
title_fullStr Improving Delivery of Secondary Prophylaxis for Rheumatic Heart Disease in a High‐Burden Setting: Outcome of a Stepped‐Wedge, Community, Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed Improving Delivery of Secondary Prophylaxis for Rheumatic Heart Disease in a High‐Burden Setting: Outcome of a Stepped‐Wedge, Community, Randomized Trial
title_short Improving Delivery of Secondary Prophylaxis for Rheumatic Heart Disease in a High‐Burden Setting: Outcome of a Stepped‐Wedge, Community, Randomized Trial
title_sort improving delivery of secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic heart disease in a high‐burden setting: outcome of a stepped‐wedge, community, randomized trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30018165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009308
work_keys_str_mv AT ralphannap improvingdeliveryofsecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticheartdiseaseinahighburdensettingoutcomeofasteppedwedgecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT dedasseljessical improvingdeliveryofsecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticheartdiseaseinahighburdensettingoutcomeofasteppedwedgecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT kirbyadrienne improvingdeliveryofsecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticheartdiseaseinahighburdensettingoutcomeofasteppedwedgecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT readclancy improvingdeliveryofsecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticheartdiseaseinahighburdensettingoutcomeofasteppedwedgecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT mitchellalisong improvingdeliveryofsecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticheartdiseaseinahighburdensettingoutcomeofasteppedwedgecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT maguiregraemep improvingdeliveryofsecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticheartdiseaseinahighburdensettingoutcomeofasteppedwedgecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT curriebartj improvingdeliveryofsecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticheartdiseaseinahighburdensettingoutcomeofasteppedwedgecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT bailierosss improvingdeliveryofsecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticheartdiseaseinahighburdensettingoutcomeofasteppedwedgecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT johnstonvanessa improvingdeliveryofsecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticheartdiseaseinahighburdensettingoutcomeofasteppedwedgecommunityrandomizedtrial
AT carapetisjonathanr improvingdeliveryofsecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticheartdiseaseinahighburdensettingoutcomeofasteppedwedgecommunityrandomizedtrial