Cargando…

Intrapulmonary Vein Ablation Without Stenosis: A Novel Balloon‐Based Direct Current Electroporation Approach

BACKGROUND: Current thermal ablation methods for atrial fibrillation, including radiofrequency and cryoablation, have a suboptimal success rate. To avoid pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis, ablation is performed outside of the PV, despite the importance of triggers inside the vein. We previously reported...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Witt, Chance M., Sugrue, Alan, Padmanabhan, Deepak, Vaidya, Vaibhav, Gruba, Sarah, Rohl, James, DeSimone, Christopher V., Killu, Ammar M., Naksuk, Niyada, Pederson, Joanne, Suddendorf, Scott, Ladewig, Dorothy J., Maor, Elad, Holmes, David R., Kapa, Suraj, Asirvatham, Samuel J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29987121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009575
_version_ 1783342766275690496
author Witt, Chance M.
Sugrue, Alan
Padmanabhan, Deepak
Vaidya, Vaibhav
Gruba, Sarah
Rohl, James
DeSimone, Christopher V.
Killu, Ammar M.
Naksuk, Niyada
Pederson, Joanne
Suddendorf, Scott
Ladewig, Dorothy J.
Maor, Elad
Holmes, David R.
Kapa, Suraj
Asirvatham, Samuel J.
author_facet Witt, Chance M.
Sugrue, Alan
Padmanabhan, Deepak
Vaidya, Vaibhav
Gruba, Sarah
Rohl, James
DeSimone, Christopher V.
Killu, Ammar M.
Naksuk, Niyada
Pederson, Joanne
Suddendorf, Scott
Ladewig, Dorothy J.
Maor, Elad
Holmes, David R.
Kapa, Suraj
Asirvatham, Samuel J.
author_sort Witt, Chance M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current thermal ablation methods for atrial fibrillation, including radiofrequency and cryoablation, have a suboptimal success rate. To avoid pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis, ablation is performed outside of the PV, despite the importance of triggers inside the vein. We previously reported on the acute effects of a novel direct current electroporation approach with a balloon catheter to create lesions inside the PVs in addition to the antrum. In this study, we aimed to determine whether the effects created by this nonthermal ablation method were associated with irreversible lesions and whether PV stenosis or other adverse effects occurred after a survival period. METHODS AND RESULTS: Initial and survival studies were performed in 5 canines. At the initial study, the balloon catheter was inflated to contact the antrum and interior of the PV. Direct current energy was delivered between 2 electrodes on the catheter in ECG‐gated 100 μs pulses. A total of 10 PVs were treated demonstrating significant acute local electrogram diminution (mean amplitude decrease of 61.2±19.8%). After the survival period (mean 27 days), computed tomography imaging showed no PV stenosis. On histologic evaluation, transmural, although not circumferential, lesions were seen in each treated vein. No PV stenosis or esophageal injury was present. CONCLUSIONS: Irreversible, transmural lesions can be created inside the PV without evidence of stenosis after a 27‐day survival period using this balloon‐based direct current ablation approach. These early data show promise for an ablation approach that could directly treat PV triggers in addition to traditional PV antrum ablation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6064854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60648542018-08-07 Intrapulmonary Vein Ablation Without Stenosis: A Novel Balloon‐Based Direct Current Electroporation Approach Witt, Chance M. Sugrue, Alan Padmanabhan, Deepak Vaidya, Vaibhav Gruba, Sarah Rohl, James DeSimone, Christopher V. Killu, Ammar M. Naksuk, Niyada Pederson, Joanne Suddendorf, Scott Ladewig, Dorothy J. Maor, Elad Holmes, David R. Kapa, Suraj Asirvatham, Samuel J. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Current thermal ablation methods for atrial fibrillation, including radiofrequency and cryoablation, have a suboptimal success rate. To avoid pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis, ablation is performed outside of the PV, despite the importance of triggers inside the vein. We previously reported on the acute effects of a novel direct current electroporation approach with a balloon catheter to create lesions inside the PVs in addition to the antrum. In this study, we aimed to determine whether the effects created by this nonthermal ablation method were associated with irreversible lesions and whether PV stenosis or other adverse effects occurred after a survival period. METHODS AND RESULTS: Initial and survival studies were performed in 5 canines. At the initial study, the balloon catheter was inflated to contact the antrum and interior of the PV. Direct current energy was delivered between 2 electrodes on the catheter in ECG‐gated 100 μs pulses. A total of 10 PVs were treated demonstrating significant acute local electrogram diminution (mean amplitude decrease of 61.2±19.8%). After the survival period (mean 27 days), computed tomography imaging showed no PV stenosis. On histologic evaluation, transmural, although not circumferential, lesions were seen in each treated vein. No PV stenosis or esophageal injury was present. CONCLUSIONS: Irreversible, transmural lesions can be created inside the PV without evidence of stenosis after a 27‐day survival period using this balloon‐based direct current ablation approach. These early data show promise for an ablation approach that could directly treat PV triggers in addition to traditional PV antrum ablation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6064854/ /pubmed/29987121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009575 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Witt, Chance M.
Sugrue, Alan
Padmanabhan, Deepak
Vaidya, Vaibhav
Gruba, Sarah
Rohl, James
DeSimone, Christopher V.
Killu, Ammar M.
Naksuk, Niyada
Pederson, Joanne
Suddendorf, Scott
Ladewig, Dorothy J.
Maor, Elad
Holmes, David R.
Kapa, Suraj
Asirvatham, Samuel J.
Intrapulmonary Vein Ablation Without Stenosis: A Novel Balloon‐Based Direct Current Electroporation Approach
title Intrapulmonary Vein Ablation Without Stenosis: A Novel Balloon‐Based Direct Current Electroporation Approach
title_full Intrapulmonary Vein Ablation Without Stenosis: A Novel Balloon‐Based Direct Current Electroporation Approach
title_fullStr Intrapulmonary Vein Ablation Without Stenosis: A Novel Balloon‐Based Direct Current Electroporation Approach
title_full_unstemmed Intrapulmonary Vein Ablation Without Stenosis: A Novel Balloon‐Based Direct Current Electroporation Approach
title_short Intrapulmonary Vein Ablation Without Stenosis: A Novel Balloon‐Based Direct Current Electroporation Approach
title_sort intrapulmonary vein ablation without stenosis: a novel balloon‐based direct current electroporation approach
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29987121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009575
work_keys_str_mv AT wittchancem intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT sugruealan intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT padmanabhandeepak intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT vaidyavaibhav intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT grubasarah intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT rohljames intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT desimonechristopherv intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT killuammarm intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT naksukniyada intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT pedersonjoanne intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT suddendorfscott intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT ladewigdorothyj intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT maorelad intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT holmesdavidr intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT kapasuraj intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach
AT asirvathamsamuelj intrapulmonaryveinablationwithoutstenosisanovelballoonbaseddirectcurrentelectroporationapproach