Cargando…

Impact of Angiographic Residual Stenosis on Clinical Outcomes After New‐Generation Drug‐Eluting Stents Implantation: Insights From a Pooled Analysis of the RESET and NEXT Trials

BACKGROUND: Previous intravascular ultrasound studies suggested the association of stent underexpansion with increased risk of stent thrombosis and restenosis. However, no previous study has addressed the association of the suboptimal angiographic result with target‐lesion revascularization (TLR) in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watanabe, Hiroki, Morimoto, Takeshi, Shiomi, Hiroki, Natsuaki, Masahiro, Kawai, Kazuya, Kozuma, Ken, Igarashi, Keiichi, Kadota, Kazushige, Tanabe, Kengo, Morino, Yoshihiro, Hibi, Kiyoshi, Akasaka, Takashi, Abe, Mitsuru, Suwa, Satoru, Muramatsu, Toshiya, Kobayashi, Masakazu, Dai, Kazuoki, Nakao, Koichi, Tarutani, Yasuhiro, Fujii, Kenshi, Kimura, Takeshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29960987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008718
_version_ 1783342778183319552
author Watanabe, Hiroki
Morimoto, Takeshi
Shiomi, Hiroki
Natsuaki, Masahiro
Kawai, Kazuya
Kozuma, Ken
Igarashi, Keiichi
Kadota, Kazushige
Tanabe, Kengo
Morino, Yoshihiro
Hibi, Kiyoshi
Akasaka, Takashi
Abe, Mitsuru
Suwa, Satoru
Muramatsu, Toshiya
Kobayashi, Masakazu
Dai, Kazuoki
Nakao, Koichi
Tarutani, Yasuhiro
Fujii, Kenshi
Kimura, Takeshi
author_facet Watanabe, Hiroki
Morimoto, Takeshi
Shiomi, Hiroki
Natsuaki, Masahiro
Kawai, Kazuya
Kozuma, Ken
Igarashi, Keiichi
Kadota, Kazushige
Tanabe, Kengo
Morino, Yoshihiro
Hibi, Kiyoshi
Akasaka, Takashi
Abe, Mitsuru
Suwa, Satoru
Muramatsu, Toshiya
Kobayashi, Masakazu
Dai, Kazuoki
Nakao, Koichi
Tarutani, Yasuhiro
Fujii, Kenshi
Kimura, Takeshi
author_sort Watanabe, Hiroki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous intravascular ultrasound studies suggested the association of stent underexpansion with increased risk of stent thrombosis and restenosis. However, no previous study has addressed the association of the suboptimal angiographic result with target‐lesion revascularization (TLR) in patients receiving new‐generation drug‐eluting stents (DES). METHODS AND RESULTS: RESET (Randomized evaluation of sirolimus‐eluting versus everolimus‐eluting stent trial) and NEXT (NOBORI biolimus‐eluting versus XIENCE/PROMUS everolimus‐eluting stent trial) are prospective, multicenter, randomized “DES versus DES” trials; 3196 patients and 3235 patients were enrolled in the RESET and NEXT, respectively. Using the pooled individual patient‐level data, the current study population consisted of 3679 patients who received single‐lesion treatment using new‐generation DES such as everolimus‐eluting stent and biolimus‐eluting stent. The study population was divided into 3 groups according to the residual in‐stent % diameter stenosis (%DS) after stent implantation by offline quantitative coronary angiography assessed in a core angiographic laboratory (optimal group: %DS <10%, intermediate group: %DS=10% to 20%, suboptimal group: %DS ≧20%). The cumulative 3‐year incidence of TLR was significantly higher in the suboptimal group than in the intermediate and optimal groups (9.8% versus 5.8% versus 5.7%, log‐rank P=0.004). Even after adjusting for the clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics, the excess TLR risk of the suboptimal group relative to the optimal group remained significant (hazard ratio: 1.65, 95% confidence interval, 1.14–2.41, P=0.009). The excess TLR risk of the suboptimal group relative to the optimal group was consistently seen across all the subgroups including heavy calcification. CONCLUSIONS: The residual angiographic in‐stent %DS ≥20% was associated with increased risk for TLR in patients treated with the new‐generation DES.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6064905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60649052018-08-09 Impact of Angiographic Residual Stenosis on Clinical Outcomes After New‐Generation Drug‐Eluting Stents Implantation: Insights From a Pooled Analysis of the RESET and NEXT Trials Watanabe, Hiroki Morimoto, Takeshi Shiomi, Hiroki Natsuaki, Masahiro Kawai, Kazuya Kozuma, Ken Igarashi, Keiichi Kadota, Kazushige Tanabe, Kengo Morino, Yoshihiro Hibi, Kiyoshi Akasaka, Takashi Abe, Mitsuru Suwa, Satoru Muramatsu, Toshiya Kobayashi, Masakazu Dai, Kazuoki Nakao, Koichi Tarutani, Yasuhiro Fujii, Kenshi Kimura, Takeshi J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Previous intravascular ultrasound studies suggested the association of stent underexpansion with increased risk of stent thrombosis and restenosis. However, no previous study has addressed the association of the suboptimal angiographic result with target‐lesion revascularization (TLR) in patients receiving new‐generation drug‐eluting stents (DES). METHODS AND RESULTS: RESET (Randomized evaluation of sirolimus‐eluting versus everolimus‐eluting stent trial) and NEXT (NOBORI biolimus‐eluting versus XIENCE/PROMUS everolimus‐eluting stent trial) are prospective, multicenter, randomized “DES versus DES” trials; 3196 patients and 3235 patients were enrolled in the RESET and NEXT, respectively. Using the pooled individual patient‐level data, the current study population consisted of 3679 patients who received single‐lesion treatment using new‐generation DES such as everolimus‐eluting stent and biolimus‐eluting stent. The study population was divided into 3 groups according to the residual in‐stent % diameter stenosis (%DS) after stent implantation by offline quantitative coronary angiography assessed in a core angiographic laboratory (optimal group: %DS <10%, intermediate group: %DS=10% to 20%, suboptimal group: %DS ≧20%). The cumulative 3‐year incidence of TLR was significantly higher in the suboptimal group than in the intermediate and optimal groups (9.8% versus 5.8% versus 5.7%, log‐rank P=0.004). Even after adjusting for the clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics, the excess TLR risk of the suboptimal group relative to the optimal group remained significant (hazard ratio: 1.65, 95% confidence interval, 1.14–2.41, P=0.009). The excess TLR risk of the suboptimal group relative to the optimal group was consistently seen across all the subgroups including heavy calcification. CONCLUSIONS: The residual angiographic in‐stent %DS ≥20% was associated with increased risk for TLR in patients treated with the new‐generation DES. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6064905/ /pubmed/29960987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008718 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Watanabe, Hiroki
Morimoto, Takeshi
Shiomi, Hiroki
Natsuaki, Masahiro
Kawai, Kazuya
Kozuma, Ken
Igarashi, Keiichi
Kadota, Kazushige
Tanabe, Kengo
Morino, Yoshihiro
Hibi, Kiyoshi
Akasaka, Takashi
Abe, Mitsuru
Suwa, Satoru
Muramatsu, Toshiya
Kobayashi, Masakazu
Dai, Kazuoki
Nakao, Koichi
Tarutani, Yasuhiro
Fujii, Kenshi
Kimura, Takeshi
Impact of Angiographic Residual Stenosis on Clinical Outcomes After New‐Generation Drug‐Eluting Stents Implantation: Insights From a Pooled Analysis of the RESET and NEXT Trials
title Impact of Angiographic Residual Stenosis on Clinical Outcomes After New‐Generation Drug‐Eluting Stents Implantation: Insights From a Pooled Analysis of the RESET and NEXT Trials
title_full Impact of Angiographic Residual Stenosis on Clinical Outcomes After New‐Generation Drug‐Eluting Stents Implantation: Insights From a Pooled Analysis of the RESET and NEXT Trials
title_fullStr Impact of Angiographic Residual Stenosis on Clinical Outcomes After New‐Generation Drug‐Eluting Stents Implantation: Insights From a Pooled Analysis of the RESET and NEXT Trials
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Angiographic Residual Stenosis on Clinical Outcomes After New‐Generation Drug‐Eluting Stents Implantation: Insights From a Pooled Analysis of the RESET and NEXT Trials
title_short Impact of Angiographic Residual Stenosis on Clinical Outcomes After New‐Generation Drug‐Eluting Stents Implantation: Insights From a Pooled Analysis of the RESET and NEXT Trials
title_sort impact of angiographic residual stenosis on clinical outcomes after new‐generation drug‐eluting stents implantation: insights from a pooled analysis of the reset and next trials
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29960987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008718
work_keys_str_mv AT watanabehiroki impactofangiographicresidualstenosisonclinicaloutcomesafternewgenerationdrugelutingstentsimplantationinsightsfromapooledanalysisoftheresetandnexttrials
AT morimototakeshi impactofangiographicresidualstenosisonclinicaloutcomesafternewgenerationdrugelutingstentsimplantationinsightsfromapooledanalysisoftheresetandnexttrials
AT shiomihiroki impactofangiographicresidualstenosisonclinicaloutcomesafternewgenerationdrugelutingstentsimplantationinsightsfromapooledanalysisoftheresetandnexttrials
AT natsuakimasahiro impactofangiographicresidualstenosisonclinicaloutcomesafternewgenerationdrugelutingstentsimplantationinsightsfromapooledanalysisoftheresetandnexttrials
AT kawaikazuya impactofangiographicresidualstenosisonclinicaloutcomesafternewgenerationdrugelutingstentsimplantationinsightsfromapooledanalysisoftheresetandnexttrials
AT kozumaken impactofangiographicresidualstenosisonclinicaloutcomesafternewgenerationdrugelutingstentsimplantationinsightsfromapooledanalysisoftheresetandnexttrials
AT igarashikeiichi impactofangiographicresidualstenosisonclinicaloutcomesafternewgenerationdrugelutingstentsimplantationinsightsfromapooledanalysisoftheresetandnexttrials
AT kadotakazushige impactofangiographicresidualstenosisonclinicaloutcomesafternewgenerationdrugelutingstentsimplantationinsightsfromapooledanalysisoftheresetandnexttrials
AT tanabekengo impactofangiographicresidualstenosisonclinicaloutcomesafternewgenerationdrugelutingstentsimplantationinsightsfromapooledanalysisoftheresetandnexttrials
AT morinoyoshihiro impactofangiographicresidualstenosisonclinicaloutcomesafternewgenerationdrugelutingstentsimplantationinsightsfromapooledanalysisoftheresetandnexttrials
AT hibikiyoshi impactofangiographicresidualstenosisonclinicaloutcomesafternewgenerationdrugelutingstentsimplantationinsightsfromapooledanalysisoftheresetandnexttrials
AT akasakatakashi impactofangiographicresidualstenosisonclinicaloutcomesafternewgenerationdrugelutingstentsimplantationinsightsfromapooledanalysisoftheresetandnexttrials
AT abemitsuru impactofangiographicresidualstenosisonclinicaloutcomesafternewgenerationdrugelutingstentsimplantationinsightsfromapooledanalysisoftheresetandnexttrials
AT suwasatoru impactofangiographicresidualstenosisonclinicaloutcomesafternewgenerationdrugelutingstentsimplantationinsightsfromapooledanalysisoftheresetandnexttrials
AT muramatsutoshiya impactofangiographicresidualstenosisonclinicaloutcomesafternewgenerationdrugelutingstentsimplantationinsightsfromapooledanalysisoftheresetandnexttrials
AT kobayashimasakazu impactofangiographicresidualstenosisonclinicaloutcomesafternewgenerationdrugelutingstentsimplantationinsightsfromapooledanalysisoftheresetandnexttrials
AT daikazuoki impactofangiographicresidualstenosisonclinicaloutcomesafternewgenerationdrugelutingstentsimplantationinsightsfromapooledanalysisoftheresetandnexttrials
AT nakaokoichi impactofangiographicresidualstenosisonclinicaloutcomesafternewgenerationdrugelutingstentsimplantationinsightsfromapooledanalysisoftheresetandnexttrials
AT tarutaniyasuhiro impactofangiographicresidualstenosisonclinicaloutcomesafternewgenerationdrugelutingstentsimplantationinsightsfromapooledanalysisoftheresetandnexttrials
AT fujiikenshi impactofangiographicresidualstenosisonclinicaloutcomesafternewgenerationdrugelutingstentsimplantationinsightsfromapooledanalysisoftheresetandnexttrials
AT kimuratakeshi impactofangiographicresidualstenosisonclinicaloutcomesafternewgenerationdrugelutingstentsimplantationinsightsfromapooledanalysisoftheresetandnexttrials
AT impactofangiographicresidualstenosisonclinicaloutcomesafternewgenerationdrugelutingstentsimplantationinsightsfromapooledanalysisoftheresetandnexttrials