Cargando…

Application of Bayes' Theorem in Valuating Depression Tests Performance

The validity of clinical diagnoses is a fundamental topic in clinical psychology, because now there are some political administrations, as the IOM or the U.K. government, which are focusing on best evidence-based practice in clinical psychology. The most problematic issue in clinical psychology is t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tommasi, Marco, Ferrara, Grazia, Saggino, Aristide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30083119
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01240
_version_ 1783342790864797696
author Tommasi, Marco
Ferrara, Grazia
Saggino, Aristide
author_facet Tommasi, Marco
Ferrara, Grazia
Saggino, Aristide
author_sort Tommasi, Marco
collection PubMed
description The validity of clinical diagnoses is a fundamental topic in clinical psychology, because now there are some political administrations, as the IOM or the U.K. government, which are focusing on best evidence-based practice in clinical psychology. The most problematic issue in clinical psychology is to avoid wrong diagnoses which can have negative consequences on individual life and on the utility of clinical treatments. In the case of diagnoses based on self-report tests, the diagnostic decision about individual health is based on the comparison between its score and the cutoff, according to the frequentist approach to probability. However, the frequentist approach underestimates the possible risks of incorrect diagnoses based on cutoffs only. The Bayesian approach is a valid alternative to make diagnoses on the basis of the scores from psychological tests. The Bayes' theorem estimates the posterior probability of the presence of a pathology on the basis of the knowledge about the diffusion of this pathology (prior probability) and of the knowledge of sensitivity and specificity values of the test. With all this information, it is possible to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of some self-report tests used for assessing depression. We analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of the most used psychological tests of depression (Zung's Self-Rating Depression Scale, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Center for Epidemiological Studies for Depression and the Beck Depression Inventory), together with a new scale (Teate Depression Inventory) developed with the IRT procedure, by analyzing the published works in which data about sensitivity and specificity of these scales are reported. Except the TDI, none of these scales can reach a satisfactory level of diagnostic accuracy, probably for the absence of an optimal procedure to select test items and subjects with clearly defined pathological symptoms which could allow the reduction of false positives in test scoring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6064972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60649722018-08-06 Application of Bayes' Theorem in Valuating Depression Tests Performance Tommasi, Marco Ferrara, Grazia Saggino, Aristide Front Psychol Psychology The validity of clinical diagnoses is a fundamental topic in clinical psychology, because now there are some political administrations, as the IOM or the U.K. government, which are focusing on best evidence-based practice in clinical psychology. The most problematic issue in clinical psychology is to avoid wrong diagnoses which can have negative consequences on individual life and on the utility of clinical treatments. In the case of diagnoses based on self-report tests, the diagnostic decision about individual health is based on the comparison between its score and the cutoff, according to the frequentist approach to probability. However, the frequentist approach underestimates the possible risks of incorrect diagnoses based on cutoffs only. The Bayesian approach is a valid alternative to make diagnoses on the basis of the scores from psychological tests. The Bayes' theorem estimates the posterior probability of the presence of a pathology on the basis of the knowledge about the diffusion of this pathology (prior probability) and of the knowledge of sensitivity and specificity values of the test. With all this information, it is possible to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of some self-report tests used for assessing depression. We analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of the most used psychological tests of depression (Zung's Self-Rating Depression Scale, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Center for Epidemiological Studies for Depression and the Beck Depression Inventory), together with a new scale (Teate Depression Inventory) developed with the IRT procedure, by analyzing the published works in which data about sensitivity and specificity of these scales are reported. Except the TDI, none of these scales can reach a satisfactory level of diagnostic accuracy, probably for the absence of an optimal procedure to select test items and subjects with clearly defined pathological symptoms which could allow the reduction of false positives in test scoring. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6064972/ /pubmed/30083119 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01240 Text en Copyright © 2018 Tommasi, Ferrara and Saggino. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Tommasi, Marco
Ferrara, Grazia
Saggino, Aristide
Application of Bayes' Theorem in Valuating Depression Tests Performance
title Application of Bayes' Theorem in Valuating Depression Tests Performance
title_full Application of Bayes' Theorem in Valuating Depression Tests Performance
title_fullStr Application of Bayes' Theorem in Valuating Depression Tests Performance
title_full_unstemmed Application of Bayes' Theorem in Valuating Depression Tests Performance
title_short Application of Bayes' Theorem in Valuating Depression Tests Performance
title_sort application of bayes' theorem in valuating depression tests performance
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6064972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30083119
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01240
work_keys_str_mv AT tommasimarco applicationofbayestheoreminvaluatingdepressiontestsperformance
AT ferraragrazia applicationofbayestheoreminvaluatingdepressiontestsperformance
AT sagginoaristide applicationofbayestheoreminvaluatingdepressiontestsperformance