Cargando…

Optimised ARID1A immunohistochemistry is an accurate predictor of ARID1A mutational status in gynaecological cancers

ARID1A is a tumour suppressor gene that is frequently mutated in clear cell and endometrioid carcinomas of the ovary and endometrium and is an important clinical biomarker for novel treatment approaches for patients with ARID1A defects. However, the accuracy of ARID1A immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khalique, Saira, Naidoo, Kalnisha, Attygalle, Ayoma D, Kriplani, Divya, Daley, Frances, Lowe, Anne, Campbell, James, Jones, Thomas, Hubank, Michael, Fenwick, Kerry, Matthews, Nicholas, Rust, Alistair G, Lord, Christopher J, Banerjee, Susana, Natrajan, Rachael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6065117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29659191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.103
_version_ 1783342804769964032
author Khalique, Saira
Naidoo, Kalnisha
Attygalle, Ayoma D
Kriplani, Divya
Daley, Frances
Lowe, Anne
Campbell, James
Jones, Thomas
Hubank, Michael
Fenwick, Kerry
Matthews, Nicholas
Rust, Alistair G
Lord, Christopher J
Banerjee, Susana
Natrajan, Rachael
author_facet Khalique, Saira
Naidoo, Kalnisha
Attygalle, Ayoma D
Kriplani, Divya
Daley, Frances
Lowe, Anne
Campbell, James
Jones, Thomas
Hubank, Michael
Fenwick, Kerry
Matthews, Nicholas
Rust, Alistair G
Lord, Christopher J
Banerjee, Susana
Natrajan, Rachael
author_sort Khalique, Saira
collection PubMed
description ARID1A is a tumour suppressor gene that is frequently mutated in clear cell and endometrioid carcinomas of the ovary and endometrium and is an important clinical biomarker for novel treatment approaches for patients with ARID1A defects. However, the accuracy of ARID1A immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a surrogate for mutation status has not fully been established for patient stratification in clinical trials. Here we tested whether ARID1A IHC could reliably predict ARID1A mutations identified by next‐generation sequencing. Three commercially available antibodies – EPR13501 (Abcam), D2A8U (Cell Signaling), and HPA005456 (Sigma) – were optimised for IHC using cell line models and human tissue, and screened across a cohort of 45 gynaecological tumours. IHC was scored independently by three pathologists using an immunoreactive score. ARID1A mutation status was assessed using two independent sequencing platforms and the concordance between ARID1A mutation and protein expression was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic statistics. Overall, 21 ARID1A mutations were identified in 14/43 assessable tumours (33%), the majority of which were predicted to be deleterious. Mutations were identified in 6/17 (35%) ovarian clear cell carcinomas, 5/8 (63%) ovarian endometrioid carcinomas, 2/5 (40%) endometrial carcinomas, and 1/7 (14%) carcinosarcomas. ROC analysis identified greater than 95% concordance between mutation status and IHC using a modified immunoreactive score for all three antibodies allowing a definitive cut‐point for ARID1A mutant status to be calculated. Comprehensive assessment of concordance of ARID1A IHC and mutation status identified EPR13501 as an optimal antibody, with 100% concordance between ARID1A mutation status and protein expression, across different gynaecological histological subtypes. It delivered the best inter‐rater agreement between all pathologists, as well as a clear cost‐benefit advantage. This could allow patients to be accurately stratified based on their ARID1A IHC status into early phase clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6065117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60651172018-08-02 Optimised ARID1A immunohistochemistry is an accurate predictor of ARID1A mutational status in gynaecological cancers Khalique, Saira Naidoo, Kalnisha Attygalle, Ayoma D Kriplani, Divya Daley, Frances Lowe, Anne Campbell, James Jones, Thomas Hubank, Michael Fenwick, Kerry Matthews, Nicholas Rust, Alistair G Lord, Christopher J Banerjee, Susana Natrajan, Rachael J Pathol Clin Res Original Articles ARID1A is a tumour suppressor gene that is frequently mutated in clear cell and endometrioid carcinomas of the ovary and endometrium and is an important clinical biomarker for novel treatment approaches for patients with ARID1A defects. However, the accuracy of ARID1A immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a surrogate for mutation status has not fully been established for patient stratification in clinical trials. Here we tested whether ARID1A IHC could reliably predict ARID1A mutations identified by next‐generation sequencing. Three commercially available antibodies – EPR13501 (Abcam), D2A8U (Cell Signaling), and HPA005456 (Sigma) – were optimised for IHC using cell line models and human tissue, and screened across a cohort of 45 gynaecological tumours. IHC was scored independently by three pathologists using an immunoreactive score. ARID1A mutation status was assessed using two independent sequencing platforms and the concordance between ARID1A mutation and protein expression was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic statistics. Overall, 21 ARID1A mutations were identified in 14/43 assessable tumours (33%), the majority of which were predicted to be deleterious. Mutations were identified in 6/17 (35%) ovarian clear cell carcinomas, 5/8 (63%) ovarian endometrioid carcinomas, 2/5 (40%) endometrial carcinomas, and 1/7 (14%) carcinosarcomas. ROC analysis identified greater than 95% concordance between mutation status and IHC using a modified immunoreactive score for all three antibodies allowing a definitive cut‐point for ARID1A mutant status to be calculated. Comprehensive assessment of concordance of ARID1A IHC and mutation status identified EPR13501 as an optimal antibody, with 100% concordance between ARID1A mutation status and protein expression, across different gynaecological histological subtypes. It delivered the best inter‐rater agreement between all pathologists, as well as a clear cost‐benefit advantage. This could allow patients to be accurately stratified based on their ARID1A IHC status into early phase clinical trials. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6065117/ /pubmed/29659191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.103 Text en © 2018 The Authors The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research published by The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland and John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Khalique, Saira
Naidoo, Kalnisha
Attygalle, Ayoma D
Kriplani, Divya
Daley, Frances
Lowe, Anne
Campbell, James
Jones, Thomas
Hubank, Michael
Fenwick, Kerry
Matthews, Nicholas
Rust, Alistair G
Lord, Christopher J
Banerjee, Susana
Natrajan, Rachael
Optimised ARID1A immunohistochemistry is an accurate predictor of ARID1A mutational status in gynaecological cancers
title Optimised ARID1A immunohistochemistry is an accurate predictor of ARID1A mutational status in gynaecological cancers
title_full Optimised ARID1A immunohistochemistry is an accurate predictor of ARID1A mutational status in gynaecological cancers
title_fullStr Optimised ARID1A immunohistochemistry is an accurate predictor of ARID1A mutational status in gynaecological cancers
title_full_unstemmed Optimised ARID1A immunohistochemistry is an accurate predictor of ARID1A mutational status in gynaecological cancers
title_short Optimised ARID1A immunohistochemistry is an accurate predictor of ARID1A mutational status in gynaecological cancers
title_sort optimised arid1a immunohistochemistry is an accurate predictor of arid1a mutational status in gynaecological cancers
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6065117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29659191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.103
work_keys_str_mv AT khaliquesaira optimisedarid1aimmunohistochemistryisanaccuratepredictorofarid1amutationalstatusingynaecologicalcancers
AT naidookalnisha optimisedarid1aimmunohistochemistryisanaccuratepredictorofarid1amutationalstatusingynaecologicalcancers
AT attygalleayomad optimisedarid1aimmunohistochemistryisanaccuratepredictorofarid1amutationalstatusingynaecologicalcancers
AT kriplanidivya optimisedarid1aimmunohistochemistryisanaccuratepredictorofarid1amutationalstatusingynaecologicalcancers
AT daleyfrances optimisedarid1aimmunohistochemistryisanaccuratepredictorofarid1amutationalstatusingynaecologicalcancers
AT loweanne optimisedarid1aimmunohistochemistryisanaccuratepredictorofarid1amutationalstatusingynaecologicalcancers
AT campbelljames optimisedarid1aimmunohistochemistryisanaccuratepredictorofarid1amutationalstatusingynaecologicalcancers
AT jonesthomas optimisedarid1aimmunohistochemistryisanaccuratepredictorofarid1amutationalstatusingynaecologicalcancers
AT hubankmichael optimisedarid1aimmunohistochemistryisanaccuratepredictorofarid1amutationalstatusingynaecologicalcancers
AT fenwickkerry optimisedarid1aimmunohistochemistryisanaccuratepredictorofarid1amutationalstatusingynaecologicalcancers
AT matthewsnicholas optimisedarid1aimmunohistochemistryisanaccuratepredictorofarid1amutationalstatusingynaecologicalcancers
AT rustalistairg optimisedarid1aimmunohistochemistryisanaccuratepredictorofarid1amutationalstatusingynaecologicalcancers
AT lordchristopherj optimisedarid1aimmunohistochemistryisanaccuratepredictorofarid1amutationalstatusingynaecologicalcancers
AT banerjeesusana optimisedarid1aimmunohistochemistryisanaccuratepredictorofarid1amutationalstatusingynaecologicalcancers
AT natrajanrachael optimisedarid1aimmunohistochemistryisanaccuratepredictorofarid1amutationalstatusingynaecologicalcancers