Cargando…

Patient Selection in Human Papillomavirus Related Oropharyngeal Cancer: The Added Value of Prognostic Models in the New TNM 8th Edition Era

Background: With the growing interest in treatment de-intensification trials for human papillomavirus positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPC), prognostic models have become essential for patient selection. The aim of this paper is to validate and compare the prognostic ability of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deschuymer, Sarah, Dok, Rüveyda, Laenen, Annouschka, Hauben, Esther, Nuyts, Sandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6065203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30083517
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00273
_version_ 1783342817683177472
author Deschuymer, Sarah
Dok, Rüveyda
Laenen, Annouschka
Hauben, Esther
Nuyts, Sandra
author_facet Deschuymer, Sarah
Dok, Rüveyda
Laenen, Annouschka
Hauben, Esther
Nuyts, Sandra
author_sort Deschuymer, Sarah
collection PubMed
description Background: With the growing interest in treatment de-intensification trials for human papillomavirus positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPC), prognostic models have become essential for patient selection. The aim of this paper is to validate and compare the prognostic ability of the TNM 8th edition and previous published risk group classifications of Ang et al. and Rietbergen et al. and to derive a patient selection classification for de-intensification trials. Materials: Patients with HPV+ OPC treated with curative (chemo)radiotherapy between 2004 and 2017 were classified according to the TNM 8th edition, the model of Ang et al. and of Rietbergen et al. HPV status was determined by p16 immunohistochemistry staining. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and groups were compared using the log-rank test. Harrell's C-index was used as measure of discriminative performance. Results: A total of 333 OPC were identified of whom 100 were HPV+. The median follow-up was 63.7 months. The 5-year overall survival (5Y-OS) of stage I, II and III were 91.6, 55.2, and 38.0%. There was a significant difference between stage I vs. II and III. The Harrell's C-index for TNM 8th edition stage was 0.67. Including only HPV+ OPC, the Harrell's C-index for the model of Ang and Rietbergen were both 0.62. We combined the main prognostic factors defining the low risk groups in the three models, stage I, low comorbidity and ≤ 10 pack years, into one new low risk group to identify patients who may benefit from de-intensification trials. Intermediate risk was defined as stage I with high comorbidity or >10 pack years, high risk as stage II-III. The 5Y-OS were 100, 85.7, and 51.3%. The Harrell's C-index for the new classification model was 0.67. Conclusion: Although TNM 8th edition provides better OS stratification than the 7th edition, it is not performant enough for patient selection, neither are the models from Ang et al. and Rietbergen et al. Therefore, we propose a patient selection classification for de-intensification trials based on the new TNM classification 8th edition, comorbidity and smoking pack years. In addition, this study emphasizes the importance of patient selection and personalized treatment for HPV+OPC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6065203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60652032018-08-06 Patient Selection in Human Papillomavirus Related Oropharyngeal Cancer: The Added Value of Prognostic Models in the New TNM 8th Edition Era Deschuymer, Sarah Dok, Rüveyda Laenen, Annouschka Hauben, Esther Nuyts, Sandra Front Oncol Oncology Background: With the growing interest in treatment de-intensification trials for human papillomavirus positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPC), prognostic models have become essential for patient selection. The aim of this paper is to validate and compare the prognostic ability of the TNM 8th edition and previous published risk group classifications of Ang et al. and Rietbergen et al. and to derive a patient selection classification for de-intensification trials. Materials: Patients with HPV+ OPC treated with curative (chemo)radiotherapy between 2004 and 2017 were classified according to the TNM 8th edition, the model of Ang et al. and of Rietbergen et al. HPV status was determined by p16 immunohistochemistry staining. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and groups were compared using the log-rank test. Harrell's C-index was used as measure of discriminative performance. Results: A total of 333 OPC were identified of whom 100 were HPV+. The median follow-up was 63.7 months. The 5-year overall survival (5Y-OS) of stage I, II and III were 91.6, 55.2, and 38.0%. There was a significant difference between stage I vs. II and III. The Harrell's C-index for TNM 8th edition stage was 0.67. Including only HPV+ OPC, the Harrell's C-index for the model of Ang and Rietbergen were both 0.62. We combined the main prognostic factors defining the low risk groups in the three models, stage I, low comorbidity and ≤ 10 pack years, into one new low risk group to identify patients who may benefit from de-intensification trials. Intermediate risk was defined as stage I with high comorbidity or >10 pack years, high risk as stage II-III. The 5Y-OS were 100, 85.7, and 51.3%. The Harrell's C-index for the new classification model was 0.67. Conclusion: Although TNM 8th edition provides better OS stratification than the 7th edition, it is not performant enough for patient selection, neither are the models from Ang et al. and Rietbergen et al. Therefore, we propose a patient selection classification for de-intensification trials based on the new TNM classification 8th edition, comorbidity and smoking pack years. In addition, this study emphasizes the importance of patient selection and personalized treatment for HPV+OPC. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6065203/ /pubmed/30083517 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00273 Text en Copyright © 2018 Deschuymer, Dok, Laenen, Hauben and Nuyts. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Deschuymer, Sarah
Dok, Rüveyda
Laenen, Annouschka
Hauben, Esther
Nuyts, Sandra
Patient Selection in Human Papillomavirus Related Oropharyngeal Cancer: The Added Value of Prognostic Models in the New TNM 8th Edition Era
title Patient Selection in Human Papillomavirus Related Oropharyngeal Cancer: The Added Value of Prognostic Models in the New TNM 8th Edition Era
title_full Patient Selection in Human Papillomavirus Related Oropharyngeal Cancer: The Added Value of Prognostic Models in the New TNM 8th Edition Era
title_fullStr Patient Selection in Human Papillomavirus Related Oropharyngeal Cancer: The Added Value of Prognostic Models in the New TNM 8th Edition Era
title_full_unstemmed Patient Selection in Human Papillomavirus Related Oropharyngeal Cancer: The Added Value of Prognostic Models in the New TNM 8th Edition Era
title_short Patient Selection in Human Papillomavirus Related Oropharyngeal Cancer: The Added Value of Prognostic Models in the New TNM 8th Edition Era
title_sort patient selection in human papillomavirus related oropharyngeal cancer: the added value of prognostic models in the new tnm 8th edition era
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6065203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30083517
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00273
work_keys_str_mv AT deschuymersarah patientselectioninhumanpapillomavirusrelatedoropharyngealcancertheaddedvalueofprognosticmodelsinthenewtnm8theditionera
AT dokruveyda patientselectioninhumanpapillomavirusrelatedoropharyngealcancertheaddedvalueofprognosticmodelsinthenewtnm8theditionera
AT laenenannouschka patientselectioninhumanpapillomavirusrelatedoropharyngealcancertheaddedvalueofprognosticmodelsinthenewtnm8theditionera
AT haubenesther patientselectioninhumanpapillomavirusrelatedoropharyngealcancertheaddedvalueofprognosticmodelsinthenewtnm8theditionera
AT nuytssandra patientselectioninhumanpapillomavirusrelatedoropharyngealcancertheaddedvalueofprognosticmodelsinthenewtnm8theditionera