Cargando…

Data concordance between ESRD Medical Evidence Report and Medicare claims: is there any improvement?

BACKGROUND: Medicare is one of the world’s largest health insurance programs. It provides health insurance to nearly 44 million beneficiaries whose entitlements are based on age, disability, or end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Data of these ESRD beneficiaries are collected in the US Renal Data System...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mu, Yi, Chin, Andrew I., Kshirsagar, Abhijit V., Bang, Heejung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6065459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30065880
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5284
_version_ 1783342873884753920
author Mu, Yi
Chin, Andrew I.
Kshirsagar, Abhijit V.
Bang, Heejung
author_facet Mu, Yi
Chin, Andrew I.
Kshirsagar, Abhijit V.
Bang, Heejung
author_sort Mu, Yi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medicare is one of the world’s largest health insurance programs. It provides health insurance to nearly 44 million beneficiaries whose entitlements are based on age, disability, or end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Data of these ESRD beneficiaries are collected in the US Renal Data System (USRDS), which includes comorbidity information entered at the time of dialysis initiation (medical evidence data), and are used to shape health care policy. One limitation of USRDS data is the lack of validation of these medical evidence comorbidities against other comorbidity data sources, such as medical claims data. METHODS: We examined the potential for discordance between USRDS Medical Evidence and medical claims data for 11 comorbid conditions amongst Medicare beneficiaries in 2011–2013 via sensitivity, specificity, kappa and hierarchical logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 61,280 patients, most comorbid conditions recorded on the Medical Evidence forms showed high specificity (>0.9), compared to prior medical claims as reference standard. However, both sensitivity and kappa statistics varied greatly and tended to be low (most <0.5). Only diabetes appeared accurate, whereas tobacco use and drug dependence showed the poorest quality (sensitivity and kappa <0.1). Institutionalization and patient region of residency were associated with data discordance for six and five comorbidities out of 11, respectively, after conservative adjustment of multiple testing. Discordance appeared to be non-informative for congestive heart failure but was most varied for drug dependence. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that there is no improvement in comorbidity data quality in incident ESRD patients over the last two decades. Since these data are used in case-mix adjustment for outcome and quality of care metrics, the findings in this study should press regulators to implement measures to improve the accuracy of comorbidity data collection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6065459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60654592018-07-31 Data concordance between ESRD Medical Evidence Report and Medicare claims: is there any improvement? Mu, Yi Chin, Andrew I. Kshirsagar, Abhijit V. Bang, Heejung PeerJ Epidemiology BACKGROUND: Medicare is one of the world’s largest health insurance programs. It provides health insurance to nearly 44 million beneficiaries whose entitlements are based on age, disability, or end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Data of these ESRD beneficiaries are collected in the US Renal Data System (USRDS), which includes comorbidity information entered at the time of dialysis initiation (medical evidence data), and are used to shape health care policy. One limitation of USRDS data is the lack of validation of these medical evidence comorbidities against other comorbidity data sources, such as medical claims data. METHODS: We examined the potential for discordance between USRDS Medical Evidence and medical claims data for 11 comorbid conditions amongst Medicare beneficiaries in 2011–2013 via sensitivity, specificity, kappa and hierarchical logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 61,280 patients, most comorbid conditions recorded on the Medical Evidence forms showed high specificity (>0.9), compared to prior medical claims as reference standard. However, both sensitivity and kappa statistics varied greatly and tended to be low (most <0.5). Only diabetes appeared accurate, whereas tobacco use and drug dependence showed the poorest quality (sensitivity and kappa <0.1). Institutionalization and patient region of residency were associated with data discordance for six and five comorbidities out of 11, respectively, after conservative adjustment of multiple testing. Discordance appeared to be non-informative for congestive heart failure but was most varied for drug dependence. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that there is no improvement in comorbidity data quality in incident ESRD patients over the last two decades. Since these data are used in case-mix adjustment for outcome and quality of care metrics, the findings in this study should press regulators to implement measures to improve the accuracy of comorbidity data collection. PeerJ Inc. 2018-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6065459/ /pubmed/30065880 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5284 Text en ©2018 Mu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Mu, Yi
Chin, Andrew I.
Kshirsagar, Abhijit V.
Bang, Heejung
Data concordance between ESRD Medical Evidence Report and Medicare claims: is there any improvement?
title Data concordance between ESRD Medical Evidence Report and Medicare claims: is there any improvement?
title_full Data concordance between ESRD Medical Evidence Report and Medicare claims: is there any improvement?
title_fullStr Data concordance between ESRD Medical Evidence Report and Medicare claims: is there any improvement?
title_full_unstemmed Data concordance between ESRD Medical Evidence Report and Medicare claims: is there any improvement?
title_short Data concordance between ESRD Medical Evidence Report and Medicare claims: is there any improvement?
title_sort data concordance between esrd medical evidence report and medicare claims: is there any improvement?
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6065459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30065880
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5284
work_keys_str_mv AT muyi dataconcordancebetweenesrdmedicalevidencereportandmedicareclaimsisthereanyimprovement
AT chinandrewi dataconcordancebetweenesrdmedicalevidencereportandmedicareclaimsisthereanyimprovement
AT kshirsagarabhijitv dataconcordancebetweenesrdmedicalevidencereportandmedicareclaimsisthereanyimprovement
AT bangheejung dataconcordancebetweenesrdmedicalevidencereportandmedicareclaimsisthereanyimprovement