Cargando…
Species conservation profiles of a random sample of world spiders II: Gnaphosidae to Nemesiidae
Abstract. BACKGROUND: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is the most widely used information source on the extinction risk of species. One of the uses of the Red List is to evaluate and monitor the state of biodiversity and a possible approach for this purpose is the Red List Index (RLI). For m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pensoft Publishers
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6065607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30065606 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.6.e26203 |
_version_ | 1783342888326791168 |
---|---|
author | Seppälä, Sini Henriques, Sérgio Draney, Michael L Foord, Stefan Gibbons, Alastair T Gomez, Luz A Kariko, Sarah Malumbres-Olarte, Jagoba Milne, Marc Vink, Cor J Cardoso, Pedro |
author_facet | Seppälä, Sini Henriques, Sérgio Draney, Michael L Foord, Stefan Gibbons, Alastair T Gomez, Luz A Kariko, Sarah Malumbres-Olarte, Jagoba Milne, Marc Vink, Cor J Cardoso, Pedro |
author_sort | Seppälä, Sini |
collection | PubMed |
description | Abstract. BACKGROUND: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is the most widely used information source on the extinction risk of species. One of the uses of the Red List is to evaluate and monitor the state of biodiversity and a possible approach for this purpose is the Red List Index (RLI). For many taxa, mainly hyperdiverse groups, it is not possible within available resources to assess all known species. In such cases, a random sample of species might be selected for assessment and the results derived from it extrapolated for the entire group - the Sampled Red List Index (SRLI). The current contribution is the second in four papers that will constitute the baseline of a future spider SRLI encompassing 200 species distributed across the world. NEW INFORMATION: A sample of 200 species of spiders were randomly selected from the World Spider Catalogue, an updated global database containing all recognised species names for the group. The 200 selected species where divided taxonomically at the family level and the familes were ordered alphabetically. In this publication, we present the conservation profiles of 45 species belonging to the families alphabetically arranged between Gnaphosidae and Nemesiidae, which encompassed Gnaphosidae, Idiopidae, Linyphiidae, Liocranidae, Lycosidae, Micropholcommatidae, Mysmenidae and Nemesiidae. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6065607 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Pensoft Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60656072018-07-31 Species conservation profiles of a random sample of world spiders II: Gnaphosidae to Nemesiidae Seppälä, Sini Henriques, Sérgio Draney, Michael L Foord, Stefan Gibbons, Alastair T Gomez, Luz A Kariko, Sarah Malumbres-Olarte, Jagoba Milne, Marc Vink, Cor J Cardoso, Pedro Biodivers Data J Species Conservation Profiles Abstract. BACKGROUND: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is the most widely used information source on the extinction risk of species. One of the uses of the Red List is to evaluate and monitor the state of biodiversity and a possible approach for this purpose is the Red List Index (RLI). For many taxa, mainly hyperdiverse groups, it is not possible within available resources to assess all known species. In such cases, a random sample of species might be selected for assessment and the results derived from it extrapolated for the entire group - the Sampled Red List Index (SRLI). The current contribution is the second in four papers that will constitute the baseline of a future spider SRLI encompassing 200 species distributed across the world. NEW INFORMATION: A sample of 200 species of spiders were randomly selected from the World Spider Catalogue, an updated global database containing all recognised species names for the group. The 200 selected species where divided taxonomically at the family level and the familes were ordered alphabetically. In this publication, we present the conservation profiles of 45 species belonging to the families alphabetically arranged between Gnaphosidae and Nemesiidae, which encompassed Gnaphosidae, Idiopidae, Linyphiidae, Liocranidae, Lycosidae, Micropholcommatidae, Mysmenidae and Nemesiidae. Pensoft Publishers 2018-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6065607/ /pubmed/30065606 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.6.e26203 Text en Sini Seppälä, Sérgio Henriques, Michael L Draney, Stefan Foord, Alastair T Gibbons, Luz A Gomez, Sarah Kariko, Jagoba Malumbres-Olarte, Marc Milne, Cor J Vink, Pedro Cardoso http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Species Conservation Profiles Seppälä, Sini Henriques, Sérgio Draney, Michael L Foord, Stefan Gibbons, Alastair T Gomez, Luz A Kariko, Sarah Malumbres-Olarte, Jagoba Milne, Marc Vink, Cor J Cardoso, Pedro Species conservation profiles of a random sample of world spiders II: Gnaphosidae to Nemesiidae |
title | Species conservation profiles of a random sample of world spiders II: Gnaphosidae to Nemesiidae |
title_full | Species conservation profiles of a random sample of world spiders II: Gnaphosidae to Nemesiidae |
title_fullStr | Species conservation profiles of a random sample of world spiders II: Gnaphosidae to Nemesiidae |
title_full_unstemmed | Species conservation profiles of a random sample of world spiders II: Gnaphosidae to Nemesiidae |
title_short | Species conservation profiles of a random sample of world spiders II: Gnaphosidae to Nemesiidae |
title_sort | species conservation profiles of a random sample of world spiders ii: gnaphosidae to nemesiidae |
topic | Species Conservation Profiles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6065607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30065606 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.6.e26203 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seppalasini speciesconservationprofilesofarandomsampleofworldspidersiignaphosidaetonemesiidae AT henriquessergio speciesconservationprofilesofarandomsampleofworldspidersiignaphosidaetonemesiidae AT draneymichaell speciesconservationprofilesofarandomsampleofworldspidersiignaphosidaetonemesiidae AT foordstefan speciesconservationprofilesofarandomsampleofworldspidersiignaphosidaetonemesiidae AT gibbonsalastairt speciesconservationprofilesofarandomsampleofworldspidersiignaphosidaetonemesiidae AT gomezluza speciesconservationprofilesofarandomsampleofworldspidersiignaphosidaetonemesiidae AT karikosarah speciesconservationprofilesofarandomsampleofworldspidersiignaphosidaetonemesiidae AT malumbresolartejagoba speciesconservationprofilesofarandomsampleofworldspidersiignaphosidaetonemesiidae AT milnemarc speciesconservationprofilesofarandomsampleofworldspidersiignaphosidaetonemesiidae AT vinkcorj speciesconservationprofilesofarandomsampleofworldspidersiignaphosidaetonemesiidae AT cardosopedro speciesconservationprofilesofarandomsampleofworldspidersiignaphosidaetonemesiidae |