Cargando…

Recruiting and retaining participants in e-Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: Evaluating the COMiT'ID study

BACKGROUND: A Core Outcome Set (COS) is an agreed list of outcomes that are measured and reported in all clinical trials for a particular health condition. An ‘e-Delphi’ is an increasingly popular method for developing a COS whereby stakeholders are consulted via a multi-round online survey to reach...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hall, Deborah Ann, Smith, Harriet, Heffernan, Eithne, Fackrell, Kathryn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6066228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30059560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201378
_version_ 1783342936518295552
author Hall, Deborah Ann
Smith, Harriet
Heffernan, Eithne
Fackrell, Kathryn
author_facet Hall, Deborah Ann
Smith, Harriet
Heffernan, Eithne
Fackrell, Kathryn
author_sort Hall, Deborah Ann
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A Core Outcome Set (COS) is an agreed list of outcomes that are measured and reported in all clinical trials for a particular health condition. An ‘e-Delphi’ is an increasingly popular method for developing a COS whereby stakeholders are consulted via a multi-round online survey to reach agreement regarding the most important outcomes. Many COS studies seek diverse, international input that includes professionals and healthcare users. However, the recruitment and retention of participants can be deterred by various factors (e.g. language barriers and iterative, time-consuming rounds). This report evaluates the effectiveness of recruitment and retention methods used in the Core Outcome Measures in Tinnitus International Delphi (COMiT’ID) study using participant feedback from healthcare users, healthcare practitioners, researchers, commercial representatives and funders. METHODS: A range of methods were applied to recruit participants to the study and maintain engagement over the three rounds. Feedback on recruitment and retention methods was collected using a twenty-item online questionnaire, with free text comments. RESULTS: A personalised email invitation was the most frequent recruitment route, and 719 professionals and healthcare users consented to take part. Retention of each stakeholder group ranged from 76 to 91% completing all three e-Delphi rounds. Feedback was given by 379 respondents. A majority of respondents were satisfied with the study methods that were implemented to promote retention. Over 55% indicated that their overall experience closely matched their expectations at the start of the study, and over 90% felt that their contribution was appreciated. CONCLUSIONS: This report highlights study methods that worked well with respect to recruitment and retention, and those that did not. Findings provide a unique contribution to the growing evidence base of good practice in COS development by demonstrating the relative effectiveness of recruitment and retention methods for an e-Delphi survey. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This project was registered (November 2014) in the database of the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative. The protocol is published in Trials (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2123-0).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6066228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60662282018-08-10 Recruiting and retaining participants in e-Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: Evaluating the COMiT'ID study Hall, Deborah Ann Smith, Harriet Heffernan, Eithne Fackrell, Kathryn PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: A Core Outcome Set (COS) is an agreed list of outcomes that are measured and reported in all clinical trials for a particular health condition. An ‘e-Delphi’ is an increasingly popular method for developing a COS whereby stakeholders are consulted via a multi-round online survey to reach agreement regarding the most important outcomes. Many COS studies seek diverse, international input that includes professionals and healthcare users. However, the recruitment and retention of participants can be deterred by various factors (e.g. language barriers and iterative, time-consuming rounds). This report evaluates the effectiveness of recruitment and retention methods used in the Core Outcome Measures in Tinnitus International Delphi (COMiT’ID) study using participant feedback from healthcare users, healthcare practitioners, researchers, commercial representatives and funders. METHODS: A range of methods were applied to recruit participants to the study and maintain engagement over the three rounds. Feedback on recruitment and retention methods was collected using a twenty-item online questionnaire, with free text comments. RESULTS: A personalised email invitation was the most frequent recruitment route, and 719 professionals and healthcare users consented to take part. Retention of each stakeholder group ranged from 76 to 91% completing all three e-Delphi rounds. Feedback was given by 379 respondents. A majority of respondents were satisfied with the study methods that were implemented to promote retention. Over 55% indicated that their overall experience closely matched their expectations at the start of the study, and over 90% felt that their contribution was appreciated. CONCLUSIONS: This report highlights study methods that worked well with respect to recruitment and retention, and those that did not. Findings provide a unique contribution to the growing evidence base of good practice in COS development by demonstrating the relative effectiveness of recruitment and retention methods for an e-Delphi survey. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This project was registered (November 2014) in the database of the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative. The protocol is published in Trials (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2123-0). Public Library of Science 2018-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6066228/ /pubmed/30059560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201378 Text en © 2018 Hall et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hall, Deborah Ann
Smith, Harriet
Heffernan, Eithne
Fackrell, Kathryn
Recruiting and retaining participants in e-Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: Evaluating the COMiT'ID study
title Recruiting and retaining participants in e-Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: Evaluating the COMiT'ID study
title_full Recruiting and retaining participants in e-Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: Evaluating the COMiT'ID study
title_fullStr Recruiting and retaining participants in e-Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: Evaluating the COMiT'ID study
title_full_unstemmed Recruiting and retaining participants in e-Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: Evaluating the COMiT'ID study
title_short Recruiting and retaining participants in e-Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: Evaluating the COMiT'ID study
title_sort recruiting and retaining participants in e-delphi surveys for core outcome set development: evaluating the comit'id study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6066228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30059560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201378
work_keys_str_mv AT halldeborahann recruitingandretainingparticipantsinedelphisurveysforcoreoutcomesetdevelopmentevaluatingthecomitidstudy
AT smithharriet recruitingandretainingparticipantsinedelphisurveysforcoreoutcomesetdevelopmentevaluatingthecomitidstudy
AT heffernaneithne recruitingandretainingparticipantsinedelphisurveysforcoreoutcomesetdevelopmentevaluatingthecomitidstudy
AT fackrellkathryn recruitingandretainingparticipantsinedelphisurveysforcoreoutcomesetdevelopmentevaluatingthecomitidstudy
AT recruitingandretainingparticipantsinedelphisurveysforcoreoutcomesetdevelopmentevaluatingthecomitidstudy