Cargando…

Effects of a program to strengthen general practice care on hospitalisation rates: a comparative observational study

Objective: To determine the effect of a large-scale program to strengthen general practice on hospitalisation rates. Methods: This observational study compared enrolled patients in the program and a sample of non-participating patients from non-participating GPs in the same geographic area in German...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wensing, Michel, Kolle, Petra Kaufmann, Szecsenyi, Joachim, Stock, Christian, Laux, Gunter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6066294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29623749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2018.1459429
_version_ 1783342950606962688
author Wensing, Michel
Kolle, Petra Kaufmann
Szecsenyi, Joachim
Stock, Christian
Laux, Gunter
author_facet Wensing, Michel
Kolle, Petra Kaufmann
Szecsenyi, Joachim
Stock, Christian
Laux, Gunter
author_sort Wensing, Michel
collection PubMed
description Objective: To determine the effect of a large-scale program to strengthen general practice on hospitalisation rates. Methods: This observational study compared enrolled patients in the program and a sample of non-participating patients from non-participating GPs in the same geographic area in Germany. Key components of the program are: prompt access to care, comprehensiveness, continuity, empanelment, data-driven quality improvement, computerized decision support, and additional reimbursement of general practices. The outcomes in this study were hospitalisation, rehospitalisation, and avoidable hospital admission up to four years after patient inclusion. Poisson regression models and generalized estimating equations were used to estimate intervention effects. Results: In the baseline year, 19.1% were hospitalised and 13.6% had a potentially avoidable hospitalisation, 14.5% were rehospitalised within 4 weeks. Across the four observed years, yearly hospitalisations were 9.8 to 14.9% lower in enrolled patients, yearly re-hospitalisations were 5.3 to 11.5% lower, and yearly avoidable hospitalisations were 6.8 to 8.6% lower compared to the control cohort (all differences were statistically significant). The trend in the between-group difference for hospitalisations and re-hospitalisations increased, while it remained stable for avoidable hospitalisations. Conclusion: KEY POINTS: A program to strengthen general practice in Germany comprised of prompt access to care, comprehensiveness, continuity, empanelment, data-driven quality improvement, computerized decision support, and additional reimbursement of general practices. Patients who remained in the program during 4 years had increasingly lowered rates of hospitalisation and rehospitalisation compared to a control group of patients. Avoidable hospitalisations were also lower, but no trend of further lowering was found. This might suggest a ceiling effect to impact of strong general practice on hospitalisations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6066294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60662942018-08-06 Effects of a program to strengthen general practice care on hospitalisation rates: a comparative observational study Wensing, Michel Kolle, Petra Kaufmann Szecsenyi, Joachim Stock, Christian Laux, Gunter Scand J Prim Health Care Research Article Objective: To determine the effect of a large-scale program to strengthen general practice on hospitalisation rates. Methods: This observational study compared enrolled patients in the program and a sample of non-participating patients from non-participating GPs in the same geographic area in Germany. Key components of the program are: prompt access to care, comprehensiveness, continuity, empanelment, data-driven quality improvement, computerized decision support, and additional reimbursement of general practices. The outcomes in this study were hospitalisation, rehospitalisation, and avoidable hospital admission up to four years after patient inclusion. Poisson regression models and generalized estimating equations were used to estimate intervention effects. Results: In the baseline year, 19.1% were hospitalised and 13.6% had a potentially avoidable hospitalisation, 14.5% were rehospitalised within 4 weeks. Across the four observed years, yearly hospitalisations were 9.8 to 14.9% lower in enrolled patients, yearly re-hospitalisations were 5.3 to 11.5% lower, and yearly avoidable hospitalisations were 6.8 to 8.6% lower compared to the control cohort (all differences were statistically significant). The trend in the between-group difference for hospitalisations and re-hospitalisations increased, while it remained stable for avoidable hospitalisations. Conclusion: KEY POINTS: A program to strengthen general practice in Germany comprised of prompt access to care, comprehensiveness, continuity, empanelment, data-driven quality improvement, computerized decision support, and additional reimbursement of general practices. Patients who remained in the program during 4 years had increasingly lowered rates of hospitalisation and rehospitalisation compared to a control group of patients. Avoidable hospitalisations were also lower, but no trend of further lowering was found. This might suggest a ceiling effect to impact of strong general practice on hospitalisations. Taylor & Francis 2018-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6066294/ /pubmed/29623749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2018.1459429 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wensing, Michel
Kolle, Petra Kaufmann
Szecsenyi, Joachim
Stock, Christian
Laux, Gunter
Effects of a program to strengthen general practice care on hospitalisation rates: a comparative observational study
title Effects of a program to strengthen general practice care on hospitalisation rates: a comparative observational study
title_full Effects of a program to strengthen general practice care on hospitalisation rates: a comparative observational study
title_fullStr Effects of a program to strengthen general practice care on hospitalisation rates: a comparative observational study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of a program to strengthen general practice care on hospitalisation rates: a comparative observational study
title_short Effects of a program to strengthen general practice care on hospitalisation rates: a comparative observational study
title_sort effects of a program to strengthen general practice care on hospitalisation rates: a comparative observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6066294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29623749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2018.1459429
work_keys_str_mv AT wensingmichel effectsofaprogramtostrengthengeneralpracticecareonhospitalisationratesacomparativeobservationalstudy
AT kollepetrakaufmann effectsofaprogramtostrengthengeneralpracticecareonhospitalisationratesacomparativeobservationalstudy
AT szecsenyijoachim effectsofaprogramtostrengthengeneralpracticecareonhospitalisationratesacomparativeobservationalstudy
AT stockchristian effectsofaprogramtostrengthengeneralpracticecareonhospitalisationratesacomparativeobservationalstudy
AT lauxgunter effectsofaprogramtostrengthengeneralpracticecareonhospitalisationratesacomparativeobservationalstudy