Cargando…

Trans-osseous versus Anchor Repair of Acute Patellar Tendon Ruptures

OBJECTIVES: Patellar tendon ruptures are relatively uncommon injuries. They require prompt diagnosis and surgical repair to restore the extensor mechanism of the knee. The gold standard procedure is a suture repair of the tendon, passed through trans-osseous tunnels, and tying of the sutures on the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Dowd, James A., Lehoang, David, Butler, Rebecca K., De Witt, David, Mirzayan, Raffy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6066818/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118S00133
_version_ 1783343038246944768
author O’Dowd, James A.
Lehoang, David
Butler, Rebecca K.
De Witt, David
Mirzayan, Raffy
author_facet O’Dowd, James A.
Lehoang, David
Butler, Rebecca K.
De Witt, David
Mirzayan, Raffy
author_sort O’Dowd, James A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Patellar tendon ruptures are relatively uncommon injuries. They require prompt diagnosis and surgical repair to restore the extensor mechanism of the knee. The gold standard procedure is a suture repair of the tendon, passed through trans-osseous tunnels, and tying of the sutures on the superior pole of the patella. Suture anchors have gained popularity with a recent cadaveric study demonstrating significantly less gap formation during cyclic loading and significantly higher ultimate failure loads. We present the largest series of patellar tendon repairs and compare the clinical outcomes and complications of trans-osseous (TO) and anchor (A) repair types. METHODS: All patients who underwent a primary repair of a traumatic patellar tendon rupture within 45 days of injury, between 2007 and 2016, were retrospectively reviewed. Surgeries were performed at a multi-surgeon (114 surgeons), multi-center (13 centers) community-based integrated health care system. Patients with prior knee surgery, use of graft, patellar debridement for tendonitis, inferior pole avulsion fracture, concurrent knee surgery with other procedures were excluded. Patient demographic information, repair type, complications, and time from surgery to release from medical care were recorded. RESULTS: 361 patients (374 knees) met our inclusion criteria. 13 had bilateral repairs during our study period and an additional 8 had a contralateral repair prior to our study period, for a bilateral incidence at 5.8%. The average age was 39.8 years (9 to 86 years). There were 341 males (94.5%). The most common mechanism of injury was basketball (47%), fall (19.5%), football (5.0%), and soccer (4.8%). Average time from injury to surgery was 6.3 days (range: 1- 45 days). There were 321 TO and 53 A repairs. There was no significant difference in the mean age (P=0.27), gender (P=0.79), tourniquet time (P=0.93), or BMI (P=0.78) between the two groups. There was a significant difference in re-rupture between (24 of 321) TO (7.5%) and (0 of 53) A (0%) (P=0.034). Using logistic regression, we found that TO had 3.244 times the odds of re-operation as those with A (95% CI: 0.757, 13.895. p-value: 0.1129) but did not reach signficance. The infection rate was 7.5% for A and 1.6% for TO (P= 0.160). There was no difference in time to release from medical care, 18.4 weeks for and 17.1 weeks (P=0.92). CONCLUSION: Compared to Anchors, primary repair of patellar tendon ruptures with trans-osseous repair had a significantly higher re-rupture rate, but there was no difference in re-operation rate, infection, or release from medical care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6066818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60668182018-08-06 Trans-osseous versus Anchor Repair of Acute Patellar Tendon Ruptures O’Dowd, James A. Lehoang, David Butler, Rebecca K. De Witt, David Mirzayan, Raffy Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: Patellar tendon ruptures are relatively uncommon injuries. They require prompt diagnosis and surgical repair to restore the extensor mechanism of the knee. The gold standard procedure is a suture repair of the tendon, passed through trans-osseous tunnels, and tying of the sutures on the superior pole of the patella. Suture anchors have gained popularity with a recent cadaveric study demonstrating significantly less gap formation during cyclic loading and significantly higher ultimate failure loads. We present the largest series of patellar tendon repairs and compare the clinical outcomes and complications of trans-osseous (TO) and anchor (A) repair types. METHODS: All patients who underwent a primary repair of a traumatic patellar tendon rupture within 45 days of injury, between 2007 and 2016, were retrospectively reviewed. Surgeries were performed at a multi-surgeon (114 surgeons), multi-center (13 centers) community-based integrated health care system. Patients with prior knee surgery, use of graft, patellar debridement for tendonitis, inferior pole avulsion fracture, concurrent knee surgery with other procedures were excluded. Patient demographic information, repair type, complications, and time from surgery to release from medical care were recorded. RESULTS: 361 patients (374 knees) met our inclusion criteria. 13 had bilateral repairs during our study period and an additional 8 had a contralateral repair prior to our study period, for a bilateral incidence at 5.8%. The average age was 39.8 years (9 to 86 years). There were 341 males (94.5%). The most common mechanism of injury was basketball (47%), fall (19.5%), football (5.0%), and soccer (4.8%). Average time from injury to surgery was 6.3 days (range: 1- 45 days). There were 321 TO and 53 A repairs. There was no significant difference in the mean age (P=0.27), gender (P=0.79), tourniquet time (P=0.93), or BMI (P=0.78) between the two groups. There was a significant difference in re-rupture between (24 of 321) TO (7.5%) and (0 of 53) A (0%) (P=0.034). Using logistic regression, we found that TO had 3.244 times the odds of re-operation as those with A (95% CI: 0.757, 13.895. p-value: 0.1129) but did not reach signficance. The infection rate was 7.5% for A and 1.6% for TO (P= 0.160). There was no difference in time to release from medical care, 18.4 weeks for and 17.1 weeks (P=0.92). CONCLUSION: Compared to Anchors, primary repair of patellar tendon ruptures with trans-osseous repair had a significantly higher re-rupture rate, but there was no difference in re-operation rate, infection, or release from medical care. SAGE Publications 2018-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6066818/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118S00133 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
O’Dowd, James A.
Lehoang, David
Butler, Rebecca K.
De Witt, David
Mirzayan, Raffy
Trans-osseous versus Anchor Repair of Acute Patellar Tendon Ruptures
title Trans-osseous versus Anchor Repair of Acute Patellar Tendon Ruptures
title_full Trans-osseous versus Anchor Repair of Acute Patellar Tendon Ruptures
title_fullStr Trans-osseous versus Anchor Repair of Acute Patellar Tendon Ruptures
title_full_unstemmed Trans-osseous versus Anchor Repair of Acute Patellar Tendon Ruptures
title_short Trans-osseous versus Anchor Repair of Acute Patellar Tendon Ruptures
title_sort trans-osseous versus anchor repair of acute patellar tendon ruptures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6066818/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118S00133
work_keys_str_mv AT odowdjamesa transosseousversusanchorrepairofacutepatellartendonruptures
AT lehoangdavid transosseousversusanchorrepairofacutepatellartendonruptures
AT butlerrebeccak transosseousversusanchorrepairofacutepatellartendonruptures
AT dewittdavid transosseousversusanchorrepairofacutepatellartendonruptures
AT mirzayanraffy transosseousversusanchorrepairofacutepatellartendonruptures