Cargando…

Tackling obesity in mental health secure units: a mixed method synthesis of available evidence

BACKGROUND: The prevalence and incidence of obesity are high in people with severe mental illness (SMI). In England, around 6000 people with SMI access care from secure mental health units. There is currently no specific guidance on how to reduce the risk of obesity-related morbidity and mortality i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Maxine, Day, Matthew, Moholkar, Rajesh, Gilluley, Paul, Goyder, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6066985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30083382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2018.26
_version_ 1783343070291427328
author Johnson, Maxine
Day, Matthew
Moholkar, Rajesh
Gilluley, Paul
Goyder, Elizabeth
author_facet Johnson, Maxine
Day, Matthew
Moholkar, Rajesh
Gilluley, Paul
Goyder, Elizabeth
author_sort Johnson, Maxine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prevalence and incidence of obesity are high in people with severe mental illness (SMI). In England, around 6000 people with SMI access care from secure mental health units. There is currently no specific guidance on how to reduce the risk of obesity-related morbidity and mortality in this population. AIMS: To identify international evidence that addresses the issue of obesity in mental health secure units. METHOD: A mixed method review of evidence (published 2000–2015) was carried out to assess obesity prevalence, intervention and policy change, as well as barriers to change. RESULTS: Evidence from 22 mainly small, non-comparator studies (reported in 21 papers) using a range of methods was reviewed. Dietary, physical activity and cultural interventions being implemented within secure units to address the problem of obesity showed some promising outcomes for physical health and health education. These were facilitated by adequate organisational resources, staff training and motivated staff. Holistic interventions that included a social and/or competitive element were more likely to be taken up. Involving patients in decision-making mediated the tension between facilitating behaviour change and imposing control. Barriers to successful outcomes included patient movement in and out of units, severity of mental health condition and resistance to change by patients and staff. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the promising outcomes reported, further assessment is needed of the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of interventions and policies targeting the obesogenic environment, using robust research methods. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6066985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60669852018-08-06 Tackling obesity in mental health secure units: a mixed method synthesis of available evidence Johnson, Maxine Day, Matthew Moholkar, Rajesh Gilluley, Paul Goyder, Elizabeth BJPsych Open Review BACKGROUND: The prevalence and incidence of obesity are high in people with severe mental illness (SMI). In England, around 6000 people with SMI access care from secure mental health units. There is currently no specific guidance on how to reduce the risk of obesity-related morbidity and mortality in this population. AIMS: To identify international evidence that addresses the issue of obesity in mental health secure units. METHOD: A mixed method review of evidence (published 2000–2015) was carried out to assess obesity prevalence, intervention and policy change, as well as barriers to change. RESULTS: Evidence from 22 mainly small, non-comparator studies (reported in 21 papers) using a range of methods was reviewed. Dietary, physical activity and cultural interventions being implemented within secure units to address the problem of obesity showed some promising outcomes for physical health and health education. These were facilitated by adequate organisational resources, staff training and motivated staff. Holistic interventions that included a social and/or competitive element were more likely to be taken up. Involving patients in decision-making mediated the tension between facilitating behaviour change and imposing control. Barriers to successful outcomes included patient movement in and out of units, severity of mental health condition and resistance to change by patients and staff. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the promising outcomes reported, further assessment is needed of the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of interventions and policies targeting the obesogenic environment, using robust research methods. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None. Cambridge University Press 2018-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6066985/ /pubmed/30083382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2018.26 Text en © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Johnson, Maxine
Day, Matthew
Moholkar, Rajesh
Gilluley, Paul
Goyder, Elizabeth
Tackling obesity in mental health secure units: a mixed method synthesis of available evidence
title Tackling obesity in mental health secure units: a mixed method synthesis of available evidence
title_full Tackling obesity in mental health secure units: a mixed method synthesis of available evidence
title_fullStr Tackling obesity in mental health secure units: a mixed method synthesis of available evidence
title_full_unstemmed Tackling obesity in mental health secure units: a mixed method synthesis of available evidence
title_short Tackling obesity in mental health secure units: a mixed method synthesis of available evidence
title_sort tackling obesity in mental health secure units: a mixed method synthesis of available evidence
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6066985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30083382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2018.26
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonmaxine tacklingobesityinmentalhealthsecureunitsamixedmethodsynthesisofavailableevidence
AT daymatthew tacklingobesityinmentalhealthsecureunitsamixedmethodsynthesisofavailableevidence
AT moholkarrajesh tacklingobesityinmentalhealthsecureunitsamixedmethodsynthesisofavailableevidence
AT gilluleypaul tacklingobesityinmentalhealthsecureunitsamixedmethodsynthesisofavailableevidence
AT goyderelizabeth tacklingobesityinmentalhealthsecureunitsamixedmethodsynthesisofavailableevidence