Cargando…

Study protocol for a single-centre, prospective, non-blinded, randomised, 12-month, parallel-group superiority study to compare the efficacy of pharmacist intervention versus usual care for elderly patients hospitalised in orthopaedic wards

INTRODUCTION: Given that polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing are common in elderly orthopaedic patients, pharmacist interventions to improve medication practices among this population are important. However, past studies have reported mixed results regarding the effectiveness of p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Komagamine, Junpei, Sugawara, Kenichi, Kaminaga, Miho, Tatsumi, Shinpei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6067359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30061440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021924
_version_ 1783343130882342912
author Komagamine, Junpei
Sugawara, Kenichi
Kaminaga, Miho
Tatsumi, Shinpei
author_facet Komagamine, Junpei
Sugawara, Kenichi
Kaminaga, Miho
Tatsumi, Shinpei
author_sort Komagamine, Junpei
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Given that polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing are common in elderly orthopaedic patients, pharmacist interventions to improve medication practices among this population are important. However, past studies have reported mixed results regarding the effectiveness of pharmacist-led interventions in inpatient elderly care. Furthermore, few randomised controlled trials have evaluated patient-relevant outcomes as a primary endpoint. Therefore, we will evaluate whether a pharmacist-led intervention could reduce readmission of hospitalised elderly orthopaedic patients with polypharmacy or potentially inappropriate prescribing. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an ongoing single-centre, prospective, non-blinded, randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate the superiority of a pharmacist-led intervention for hospitalised elderly patients compared with usual care. The trial will include newly admitted orthopaedic patients 70 years of age and older with polypharmacy or at least one potentially inappropriate prescription, as identified by the screening tool of older people’s prescriptions (STOPP) criteria. Usual care includes medication reconciliation, patient education and monitoring, as well as providing information about discharge medications. Pharmacist interventions, in addition to usual care, include advising the patient’s physician to stop unnecessary or inappropriate medications and start necessary medications. The primary outcome is the 1-year readmission rate. Secondary outcomes are the proportion of patients who undergo emergency department visits and the occurrences of all-cause death, a new fracture, myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke. The study started in November 2017, and up to approximately 220 patients will be enrolled. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the National Hospital Organization Tochigi Medical Center (No. 29–22). The trial was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) clinical registry. The results of this trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000029404.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6067359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60673592018-08-02 Study protocol for a single-centre, prospective, non-blinded, randomised, 12-month, parallel-group superiority study to compare the efficacy of pharmacist intervention versus usual care for elderly patients hospitalised in orthopaedic wards Komagamine, Junpei Sugawara, Kenichi Kaminaga, Miho Tatsumi, Shinpei BMJ Open Geriatric Medicine INTRODUCTION: Given that polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing are common in elderly orthopaedic patients, pharmacist interventions to improve medication practices among this population are important. However, past studies have reported mixed results regarding the effectiveness of pharmacist-led interventions in inpatient elderly care. Furthermore, few randomised controlled trials have evaluated patient-relevant outcomes as a primary endpoint. Therefore, we will evaluate whether a pharmacist-led intervention could reduce readmission of hospitalised elderly orthopaedic patients with polypharmacy or potentially inappropriate prescribing. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an ongoing single-centre, prospective, non-blinded, randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate the superiority of a pharmacist-led intervention for hospitalised elderly patients compared with usual care. The trial will include newly admitted orthopaedic patients 70 years of age and older with polypharmacy or at least one potentially inappropriate prescription, as identified by the screening tool of older people’s prescriptions (STOPP) criteria. Usual care includes medication reconciliation, patient education and monitoring, as well as providing information about discharge medications. Pharmacist interventions, in addition to usual care, include advising the patient’s physician to stop unnecessary or inappropriate medications and start necessary medications. The primary outcome is the 1-year readmission rate. Secondary outcomes are the proportion of patients who undergo emergency department visits and the occurrences of all-cause death, a new fracture, myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke. The study started in November 2017, and up to approximately 220 patients will be enrolled. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the National Hospital Organization Tochigi Medical Center (No. 29–22). The trial was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) clinical registry. The results of this trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000029404. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6067359/ /pubmed/30061440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021924 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Geriatric Medicine
Komagamine, Junpei
Sugawara, Kenichi
Kaminaga, Miho
Tatsumi, Shinpei
Study protocol for a single-centre, prospective, non-blinded, randomised, 12-month, parallel-group superiority study to compare the efficacy of pharmacist intervention versus usual care for elderly patients hospitalised in orthopaedic wards
title Study protocol for a single-centre, prospective, non-blinded, randomised, 12-month, parallel-group superiority study to compare the efficacy of pharmacist intervention versus usual care for elderly patients hospitalised in orthopaedic wards
title_full Study protocol for a single-centre, prospective, non-blinded, randomised, 12-month, parallel-group superiority study to compare the efficacy of pharmacist intervention versus usual care for elderly patients hospitalised in orthopaedic wards
title_fullStr Study protocol for a single-centre, prospective, non-blinded, randomised, 12-month, parallel-group superiority study to compare the efficacy of pharmacist intervention versus usual care for elderly patients hospitalised in orthopaedic wards
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol for a single-centre, prospective, non-blinded, randomised, 12-month, parallel-group superiority study to compare the efficacy of pharmacist intervention versus usual care for elderly patients hospitalised in orthopaedic wards
title_short Study protocol for a single-centre, prospective, non-blinded, randomised, 12-month, parallel-group superiority study to compare the efficacy of pharmacist intervention versus usual care for elderly patients hospitalised in orthopaedic wards
title_sort study protocol for a single-centre, prospective, non-blinded, randomised, 12-month, parallel-group superiority study to compare the efficacy of pharmacist intervention versus usual care for elderly patients hospitalised in orthopaedic wards
topic Geriatric Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6067359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30061440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021924
work_keys_str_mv AT komagaminejunpei studyprotocolforasinglecentreprospectivenonblindedrandomised12monthparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheefficacyofpharmacistinterventionversususualcareforelderlypatientshospitalisedinorthopaedicwards
AT sugawarakenichi studyprotocolforasinglecentreprospectivenonblindedrandomised12monthparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheefficacyofpharmacistinterventionversususualcareforelderlypatientshospitalisedinorthopaedicwards
AT kaminagamiho studyprotocolforasinglecentreprospectivenonblindedrandomised12monthparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheefficacyofpharmacistinterventionversususualcareforelderlypatientshospitalisedinorthopaedicwards
AT tatsumishinpei studyprotocolforasinglecentreprospectivenonblindedrandomised12monthparallelgroupsuperioritystudytocomparetheefficacyofpharmacistinterventionversususualcareforelderlypatientshospitalisedinorthopaedicwards