Cargando…

Can a bothersome course of pelvic pain from mid-pregnancy to birth be predicted? A Norwegian prospective longitudinal SMS-Track study

OBJECTIVE: To explore if pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain (PGP), subgrouped following the results from two clinical tests with high validity and reliability, differ in demographic characteristics and weekly amount of days with bothersome symptoms through the second half of pregnancy. DESIGN: A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malmqvist, Stefan, Kjaermann, Inger, Andersen, Knut, Gausel, Anne Marie, Økland, Inger, Larsen, Jan Petter, Bronnick, Kolbjorn S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6067360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30049694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021378
_version_ 1783343131118272512
author Malmqvist, Stefan
Kjaermann, Inger
Andersen, Knut
Gausel, Anne Marie
Økland, Inger
Larsen, Jan Petter
Bronnick, Kolbjorn S
author_facet Malmqvist, Stefan
Kjaermann, Inger
Andersen, Knut
Gausel, Anne Marie
Økland, Inger
Larsen, Jan Petter
Bronnick, Kolbjorn S
author_sort Malmqvist, Stefan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore if pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain (PGP), subgrouped following the results from two clinical tests with high validity and reliability, differ in demographic characteristics and weekly amount of days with bothersome symptoms through the second half of pregnancy. DESIGN: A prospective longitudinal cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women with pelvic and lumbopelvic pain due for their second-trimester routine ultrasound examination. SETTING: Obstetric outpatient clinic at Stavanger University Hospital, Norway. METHODS: Women reporting pelvic and lumbopelvic pain completed a questionnaire on demographic and clinical features. They were clinically examined following a test procedure recommended in the European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of PGP. Women without pain symptoms completed a questionnaire on demographic data. All women were followed weekly through an SMS-Track survey until delivery. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures were the results from clinical diagnostic tests for PGP and the number of days per week with bothersome pelvic pain. RESULTS: 503 women participated. 42% (212/503) reported pain in the lumbopelvic region and 39% (196/503) fulfilled the criteria for a probable PGP diagnosis. 27% (137/503) reported both the posterior pelvic pain provocation (P4) and the active straight leg raise (ASLR) tests positive at baseline in week 18, revealing 7.55 (95% CI 5.54 to 10.29) times higher mean number of days with bothersome pelvic pain compared with women with both tests negative. They presented the highest scores for workload, depressed mood, pain level, body mass index, Oswestry Disability Index and the number of previous pregnancies. Exercising regularly before and during pregnancy was more common in women with negative tests. CONCLUSION: If both P4 and ASLR tests were positive mid-pregnancy, a persistent bothersome pelvic pain of more than 5 days per week throughout the remainder of pregnancy could be predicted. Increased individual control over work situation and an active lifestyle, including regular exercise before and during pregnancy, may serve as a PGP prophylactic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6067360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60673602018-08-02 Can a bothersome course of pelvic pain from mid-pregnancy to birth be predicted? A Norwegian prospective longitudinal SMS-Track study Malmqvist, Stefan Kjaermann, Inger Andersen, Knut Gausel, Anne Marie Økland, Inger Larsen, Jan Petter Bronnick, Kolbjorn S BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: To explore if pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain (PGP), subgrouped following the results from two clinical tests with high validity and reliability, differ in demographic characteristics and weekly amount of days with bothersome symptoms through the second half of pregnancy. DESIGN: A prospective longitudinal cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women with pelvic and lumbopelvic pain due for their second-trimester routine ultrasound examination. SETTING: Obstetric outpatient clinic at Stavanger University Hospital, Norway. METHODS: Women reporting pelvic and lumbopelvic pain completed a questionnaire on demographic and clinical features. They were clinically examined following a test procedure recommended in the European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of PGP. Women without pain symptoms completed a questionnaire on demographic data. All women were followed weekly through an SMS-Track survey until delivery. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures were the results from clinical diagnostic tests for PGP and the number of days per week with bothersome pelvic pain. RESULTS: 503 women participated. 42% (212/503) reported pain in the lumbopelvic region and 39% (196/503) fulfilled the criteria for a probable PGP diagnosis. 27% (137/503) reported both the posterior pelvic pain provocation (P4) and the active straight leg raise (ASLR) tests positive at baseline in week 18, revealing 7.55 (95% CI 5.54 to 10.29) times higher mean number of days with bothersome pelvic pain compared with women with both tests negative. They presented the highest scores for workload, depressed mood, pain level, body mass index, Oswestry Disability Index and the number of previous pregnancies. Exercising regularly before and during pregnancy was more common in women with negative tests. CONCLUSION: If both P4 and ASLR tests were positive mid-pregnancy, a persistent bothersome pelvic pain of more than 5 days per week throughout the remainder of pregnancy could be predicted. Increased individual control over work situation and an active lifestyle, including regular exercise before and during pregnancy, may serve as a PGP prophylactic. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6067360/ /pubmed/30049694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021378 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Malmqvist, Stefan
Kjaermann, Inger
Andersen, Knut
Gausel, Anne Marie
Økland, Inger
Larsen, Jan Petter
Bronnick, Kolbjorn S
Can a bothersome course of pelvic pain from mid-pregnancy to birth be predicted? A Norwegian prospective longitudinal SMS-Track study
title Can a bothersome course of pelvic pain from mid-pregnancy to birth be predicted? A Norwegian prospective longitudinal SMS-Track study
title_full Can a bothersome course of pelvic pain from mid-pregnancy to birth be predicted? A Norwegian prospective longitudinal SMS-Track study
title_fullStr Can a bothersome course of pelvic pain from mid-pregnancy to birth be predicted? A Norwegian prospective longitudinal SMS-Track study
title_full_unstemmed Can a bothersome course of pelvic pain from mid-pregnancy to birth be predicted? A Norwegian prospective longitudinal SMS-Track study
title_short Can a bothersome course of pelvic pain from mid-pregnancy to birth be predicted? A Norwegian prospective longitudinal SMS-Track study
title_sort can a bothersome course of pelvic pain from mid-pregnancy to birth be predicted? a norwegian prospective longitudinal sms-track study
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6067360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30049694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021378
work_keys_str_mv AT malmqviststefan canabothersomecourseofpelvicpainfrommidpregnancytobirthbepredictedanorwegianprospectivelongitudinalsmstrackstudy
AT kjaermanninger canabothersomecourseofpelvicpainfrommidpregnancytobirthbepredictedanorwegianprospectivelongitudinalsmstrackstudy
AT andersenknut canabothersomecourseofpelvicpainfrommidpregnancytobirthbepredictedanorwegianprospectivelongitudinalsmstrackstudy
AT gauselannemarie canabothersomecourseofpelvicpainfrommidpregnancytobirthbepredictedanorwegianprospectivelongitudinalsmstrackstudy
AT øklandinger canabothersomecourseofpelvicpainfrommidpregnancytobirthbepredictedanorwegianprospectivelongitudinalsmstrackstudy
AT larsenjanpetter canabothersomecourseofpelvicpainfrommidpregnancytobirthbepredictedanorwegianprospectivelongitudinalsmstrackstudy
AT bronnickkolbjorns canabothersomecourseofpelvicpainfrommidpregnancytobirthbepredictedanorwegianprospectivelongitudinalsmstrackstudy