Cargando…

Reviewing progress in public involvement in NIHR research: developing and implementing a new vision for the future

OBJECTIVES: To review the progress of public involvement (PPI) in NIHR (National Institute for Health Research) research, identify barriers and enablers, reflect on the influence of PPI on the wider health research system in the UK and internationally and develop a vision for public involvement in r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Staniszewska, Sophie, Denegri, Simon, Matthews, Rachel, Minogue, Virginia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6067369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30061427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017124
_version_ 1783343133296164864
author Staniszewska, Sophie
Denegri, Simon
Matthews, Rachel
Minogue, Virginia
author_facet Staniszewska, Sophie
Denegri, Simon
Matthews, Rachel
Minogue, Virginia
author_sort Staniszewska, Sophie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To review the progress of public involvement (PPI) in NIHR (National Institute for Health Research) research, identify barriers and enablers, reflect on the influence of PPI on the wider health research system in the UK and internationally and develop a vision for public involvement in research for 2025. The developing evidence base, growing institutional commitment and public involvement activity highlight its growth as a significant international social movement. DESIGN: The ‘Breaking Boundaries Review’ was commissioned by the Department of Health. An expert advisory panel was convened. Data sources included: an online survey, international evidence sessions, workshop events, open submission of documents and supporting materials and existing systematic reviews. Thematic analysis identified key themes. NVivo was used for data management. The themes informed the report’s vision, mission and recommendations, published as ‘Going the Extra Mile—Improving the health and the wealth of the nation through public involvement in research’. The Review is now being implemented across the NIHR. RESULTS: This paper reports the Review findings, the first of its type internationally. A range of barriers and enablers to progress were identified, including attitudes, resources, infrastructure, training and support and leadership. The importance of evidence to underpin practice and continuous improvement emerged. Co-production was identified as a concept central to strengthening public involvement in the future. The Vision and Mission are supported by four suggested measures of success, reach, refinement, relevance and relationships. CONCLUSIONS: The NIHR is the first funder of its size and importance globally to review its approach to public involvement. While significant progress has been made, there is a need to consolidate progress and accelerate the spread of effective practice, drawing on evidence. The outcomes of the Review are being implemented across the NIHR. The findings and recommendations have transferability for other organisations, countries and individuals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6067369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60673692018-08-02 Reviewing progress in public involvement in NIHR research: developing and implementing a new vision for the future Staniszewska, Sophie Denegri, Simon Matthews, Rachel Minogue, Virginia BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVES: To review the progress of public involvement (PPI) in NIHR (National Institute for Health Research) research, identify barriers and enablers, reflect on the influence of PPI on the wider health research system in the UK and internationally and develop a vision for public involvement in research for 2025. The developing evidence base, growing institutional commitment and public involvement activity highlight its growth as a significant international social movement. DESIGN: The ‘Breaking Boundaries Review’ was commissioned by the Department of Health. An expert advisory panel was convened. Data sources included: an online survey, international evidence sessions, workshop events, open submission of documents and supporting materials and existing systematic reviews. Thematic analysis identified key themes. NVivo was used for data management. The themes informed the report’s vision, mission and recommendations, published as ‘Going the Extra Mile—Improving the health and the wealth of the nation through public involvement in research’. The Review is now being implemented across the NIHR. RESULTS: This paper reports the Review findings, the first of its type internationally. A range of barriers and enablers to progress were identified, including attitudes, resources, infrastructure, training and support and leadership. The importance of evidence to underpin practice and continuous improvement emerged. Co-production was identified as a concept central to strengthening public involvement in the future. The Vision and Mission are supported by four suggested measures of success, reach, refinement, relevance and relationships. CONCLUSIONS: The NIHR is the first funder of its size and importance globally to review its approach to public involvement. While significant progress has been made, there is a need to consolidate progress and accelerate the spread of effective practice, drawing on evidence. The outcomes of the Review are being implemented across the NIHR. The findings and recommendations have transferability for other organisations, countries and individuals. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6067369/ /pubmed/30061427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017124 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Policy
Staniszewska, Sophie
Denegri, Simon
Matthews, Rachel
Minogue, Virginia
Reviewing progress in public involvement in NIHR research: developing and implementing a new vision for the future
title Reviewing progress in public involvement in NIHR research: developing and implementing a new vision for the future
title_full Reviewing progress in public involvement in NIHR research: developing and implementing a new vision for the future
title_fullStr Reviewing progress in public involvement in NIHR research: developing and implementing a new vision for the future
title_full_unstemmed Reviewing progress in public involvement in NIHR research: developing and implementing a new vision for the future
title_short Reviewing progress in public involvement in NIHR research: developing and implementing a new vision for the future
title_sort reviewing progress in public involvement in nihr research: developing and implementing a new vision for the future
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6067369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30061427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017124
work_keys_str_mv AT staniszewskasophie reviewingprogressinpublicinvolvementinnihrresearchdevelopingandimplementinganewvisionforthefuture
AT denegrisimon reviewingprogressinpublicinvolvementinnihrresearchdevelopingandimplementinganewvisionforthefuture
AT matthewsrachel reviewingprogressinpublicinvolvementinnihrresearchdevelopingandimplementinganewvisionforthefuture
AT minoguevirginia reviewingprogressinpublicinvolvementinnihrresearchdevelopingandimplementinganewvisionforthefuture