Cargando…
Correction of copy number induced false positives in CRISPR screens
Cell autonomous cancer dependencies are now routinely identified using CRISPR loss-of-function viability screens. However, a bias exists that makes it difficult to assess the true essentiality of genes located in amplicons, since the entire amplified region can exhibit lethal scores. These false-pos...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6067744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30024886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006279 |
_version_ | 1783343162724450304 |
---|---|
author | de Weck, Antoine Golji, Javad Jones, Michael D. Korn, Joshua M. Billy, Eric McDonald, E. Robert Schmelzle, Tobias Bitter, Hans Kauffmann, Audrey |
author_facet | de Weck, Antoine Golji, Javad Jones, Michael D. Korn, Joshua M. Billy, Eric McDonald, E. Robert Schmelzle, Tobias Bitter, Hans Kauffmann, Audrey |
author_sort | de Weck, Antoine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cell autonomous cancer dependencies are now routinely identified using CRISPR loss-of-function viability screens. However, a bias exists that makes it difficult to assess the true essentiality of genes located in amplicons, since the entire amplified region can exhibit lethal scores. These false-positive hits can either be discarded from further analysis, which in cancer models can represent a significant number of hits, or methods can be developed to rescue the true-positives within amplified regions. We propose two methods to rescue true positive hits in amplified regions by correcting for this copy number artefact. The Local Drop Out (LDO) method uses the relative lethality scores within genomic regions to assess true essentiality and does not require additional orthogonal data (e.g. copy number value). LDO is meant to be used in screens covering a dense region of the genome (e.g. a whole chromosome or the whole genome). The General Additive Model (GAM) method models the screening data as a function of the known copy number values and removes the systematic effect from the measured lethality. GAM does not require the same density as LDO, but does require prior knowledge of the copy number values. Both methods have been developed with single sample experiments in mind so that the correction can be applied even in smaller screens. Here we demonstrate the efficacy of both methods at removing the copy number effect and rescuing hits from some of the amplified regions. We estimate a 70–80% decrease of false positive hits with either method in regions of high copy number compared to no correction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6067744 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60677442018-08-10 Correction of copy number induced false positives in CRISPR screens de Weck, Antoine Golji, Javad Jones, Michael D. Korn, Joshua M. Billy, Eric McDonald, E. Robert Schmelzle, Tobias Bitter, Hans Kauffmann, Audrey PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Cell autonomous cancer dependencies are now routinely identified using CRISPR loss-of-function viability screens. However, a bias exists that makes it difficult to assess the true essentiality of genes located in amplicons, since the entire amplified region can exhibit lethal scores. These false-positive hits can either be discarded from further analysis, which in cancer models can represent a significant number of hits, or methods can be developed to rescue the true-positives within amplified regions. We propose two methods to rescue true positive hits in amplified regions by correcting for this copy number artefact. The Local Drop Out (LDO) method uses the relative lethality scores within genomic regions to assess true essentiality and does not require additional orthogonal data (e.g. copy number value). LDO is meant to be used in screens covering a dense region of the genome (e.g. a whole chromosome or the whole genome). The General Additive Model (GAM) method models the screening data as a function of the known copy number values and removes the systematic effect from the measured lethality. GAM does not require the same density as LDO, but does require prior knowledge of the copy number values. Both methods have been developed with single sample experiments in mind so that the correction can be applied even in smaller screens. Here we demonstrate the efficacy of both methods at removing the copy number effect and rescuing hits from some of the amplified regions. We estimate a 70–80% decrease of false positive hits with either method in regions of high copy number compared to no correction. Public Library of Science 2018-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6067744/ /pubmed/30024886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006279 Text en © 2018 de Weck et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article de Weck, Antoine Golji, Javad Jones, Michael D. Korn, Joshua M. Billy, Eric McDonald, E. Robert Schmelzle, Tobias Bitter, Hans Kauffmann, Audrey Correction of copy number induced false positives in CRISPR screens |
title | Correction of copy number induced false positives in CRISPR screens |
title_full | Correction of copy number induced false positives in CRISPR screens |
title_fullStr | Correction of copy number induced false positives in CRISPR screens |
title_full_unstemmed | Correction of copy number induced false positives in CRISPR screens |
title_short | Correction of copy number induced false positives in CRISPR screens |
title_sort | correction of copy number induced false positives in crispr screens |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6067744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30024886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006279 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deweckantoine correctionofcopynumberinducedfalsepositivesincrisprscreens AT goljijavad correctionofcopynumberinducedfalsepositivesincrisprscreens AT jonesmichaeld correctionofcopynumberinducedfalsepositivesincrisprscreens AT kornjoshuam correctionofcopynumberinducedfalsepositivesincrisprscreens AT billyeric correctionofcopynumberinducedfalsepositivesincrisprscreens AT mcdonalderobert correctionofcopynumberinducedfalsepositivesincrisprscreens AT schmelzletobias correctionofcopynumberinducedfalsepositivesincrisprscreens AT bitterhans correctionofcopynumberinducedfalsepositivesincrisprscreens AT kauffmannaudrey correctionofcopynumberinducedfalsepositivesincrisprscreens |