Cargando…

Correction of copy number induced false positives in CRISPR screens

Cell autonomous cancer dependencies are now routinely identified using CRISPR loss-of-function viability screens. However, a bias exists that makes it difficult to assess the true essentiality of genes located in amplicons, since the entire amplified region can exhibit lethal scores. These false-pos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Weck, Antoine, Golji, Javad, Jones, Michael D., Korn, Joshua M., Billy, Eric, McDonald, E. Robert, Schmelzle, Tobias, Bitter, Hans, Kauffmann, Audrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6067744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30024886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006279
_version_ 1783343162724450304
author de Weck, Antoine
Golji, Javad
Jones, Michael D.
Korn, Joshua M.
Billy, Eric
McDonald, E. Robert
Schmelzle, Tobias
Bitter, Hans
Kauffmann, Audrey
author_facet de Weck, Antoine
Golji, Javad
Jones, Michael D.
Korn, Joshua M.
Billy, Eric
McDonald, E. Robert
Schmelzle, Tobias
Bitter, Hans
Kauffmann, Audrey
author_sort de Weck, Antoine
collection PubMed
description Cell autonomous cancer dependencies are now routinely identified using CRISPR loss-of-function viability screens. However, a bias exists that makes it difficult to assess the true essentiality of genes located in amplicons, since the entire amplified region can exhibit lethal scores. These false-positive hits can either be discarded from further analysis, which in cancer models can represent a significant number of hits, or methods can be developed to rescue the true-positives within amplified regions. We propose two methods to rescue true positive hits in amplified regions by correcting for this copy number artefact. The Local Drop Out (LDO) method uses the relative lethality scores within genomic regions to assess true essentiality and does not require additional orthogonal data (e.g. copy number value). LDO is meant to be used in screens covering a dense region of the genome (e.g. a whole chromosome or the whole genome). The General Additive Model (GAM) method models the screening data as a function of the known copy number values and removes the systematic effect from the measured lethality. GAM does not require the same density as LDO, but does require prior knowledge of the copy number values. Both methods have been developed with single sample experiments in mind so that the correction can be applied even in smaller screens. Here we demonstrate the efficacy of both methods at removing the copy number effect and rescuing hits from some of the amplified regions. We estimate a 70–80% decrease of false positive hits with either method in regions of high copy number compared to no correction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6067744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60677442018-08-10 Correction of copy number induced false positives in CRISPR screens de Weck, Antoine Golji, Javad Jones, Michael D. Korn, Joshua M. Billy, Eric McDonald, E. Robert Schmelzle, Tobias Bitter, Hans Kauffmann, Audrey PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Cell autonomous cancer dependencies are now routinely identified using CRISPR loss-of-function viability screens. However, a bias exists that makes it difficult to assess the true essentiality of genes located in amplicons, since the entire amplified region can exhibit lethal scores. These false-positive hits can either be discarded from further analysis, which in cancer models can represent a significant number of hits, or methods can be developed to rescue the true-positives within amplified regions. We propose two methods to rescue true positive hits in amplified regions by correcting for this copy number artefact. The Local Drop Out (LDO) method uses the relative lethality scores within genomic regions to assess true essentiality and does not require additional orthogonal data (e.g. copy number value). LDO is meant to be used in screens covering a dense region of the genome (e.g. a whole chromosome or the whole genome). The General Additive Model (GAM) method models the screening data as a function of the known copy number values and removes the systematic effect from the measured lethality. GAM does not require the same density as LDO, but does require prior knowledge of the copy number values. Both methods have been developed with single sample experiments in mind so that the correction can be applied even in smaller screens. Here we demonstrate the efficacy of both methods at removing the copy number effect and rescuing hits from some of the amplified regions. We estimate a 70–80% decrease of false positive hits with either method in regions of high copy number compared to no correction. Public Library of Science 2018-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6067744/ /pubmed/30024886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006279 Text en © 2018 de Weck et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
de Weck, Antoine
Golji, Javad
Jones, Michael D.
Korn, Joshua M.
Billy, Eric
McDonald, E. Robert
Schmelzle, Tobias
Bitter, Hans
Kauffmann, Audrey
Correction of copy number induced false positives in CRISPR screens
title Correction of copy number induced false positives in CRISPR screens
title_full Correction of copy number induced false positives in CRISPR screens
title_fullStr Correction of copy number induced false positives in CRISPR screens
title_full_unstemmed Correction of copy number induced false positives in CRISPR screens
title_short Correction of copy number induced false positives in CRISPR screens
title_sort correction of copy number induced false positives in crispr screens
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6067744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30024886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006279
work_keys_str_mv AT deweckantoine correctionofcopynumberinducedfalsepositivesincrisprscreens
AT goljijavad correctionofcopynumberinducedfalsepositivesincrisprscreens
AT jonesmichaeld correctionofcopynumberinducedfalsepositivesincrisprscreens
AT kornjoshuam correctionofcopynumberinducedfalsepositivesincrisprscreens
AT billyeric correctionofcopynumberinducedfalsepositivesincrisprscreens
AT mcdonalderobert correctionofcopynumberinducedfalsepositivesincrisprscreens
AT schmelzletobias correctionofcopynumberinducedfalsepositivesincrisprscreens
AT bitterhans correctionofcopynumberinducedfalsepositivesincrisprscreens
AT kauffmannaudrey correctionofcopynumberinducedfalsepositivesincrisprscreens