Cargando…

A Phase 4, multicentre, randomized, single-blind clinical trial to evaluate the immunogenicity of the live, attenuated, oral rotavirus vaccine (116E), ROTAVAC®, administered simultaneously with or without the buffering agent in healthy infants in India

Background: The World Health Organization recommends that rotavirus vaccines should be included in all national immunization programs. Some currently licensed oral rotavirus vaccines contain a buffering agent (either as part of a ready-to-use liquid formulation or added during reconstitution) to red...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ella, Raches, Bobba, Radhika, Muralidhar, Sanjay, Babji, Sudhir, Vadrevu, Krishna Mohan, Bhan, Maharaj Kishan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6067888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29543547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2018.1450709
_version_ 1783343185666244608
author Ella, Raches
Bobba, Radhika
Muralidhar, Sanjay
Babji, Sudhir
Vadrevu, Krishna Mohan
Bhan, Maharaj Kishan
author_facet Ella, Raches
Bobba, Radhika
Muralidhar, Sanjay
Babji, Sudhir
Vadrevu, Krishna Mohan
Bhan, Maharaj Kishan
author_sort Ella, Raches
collection PubMed
description Background: The World Health Organization recommends that rotavirus vaccines should be included in all national immunization programs. Some currently licensed oral rotavirus vaccines contain a buffering agent (either as part of a ready-to-use liquid formulation or added during reconstitution) to reduce possible degradation of the vaccine virus in the infant gut, which poses several programmatic challenges (the large dose volume or the reconstitution requirement) during vaccine administration. Because ROTAVAC®, a WHO prequalified vaccine, was derived from the 116E neonatal strain, we evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of ROTAVAC® without buffer and ROTAVAC® with buffer in a phase 4, multicentre, single-blind, randomized clinical trial in healthy infants in India. Methods: 900 infants, approximately 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age, were assigned to 3 groups to receive ROTAVAC® (0.5 mL dose) orally: (i) 2.5 mL of citrate-bicarbonate buffer 5 minutes prior to administration of ROTAVAC® (Group I), (ii) ROTAVAC®, alone, without any buffer (Group II), or (iii) ROTAVAC®, mixed with buffer immediately before administration (Group III). Non–inferiority was compared among the groups for differences in serological responses (detected by serum anti-rotavirus IgA) and safety. Results: Geometric mean titers post vaccination at day 84 (28 days after dose 3) were 19.6 (95%CI: 17.0, 22.7), 20.7 (95%CI: 17.9, 24) and 19.2 (95%CI: 16.8, 22.1) for groups I, II and III respectively. Further, seroconversion rates and distribution of adverse events were similar among groups. Conclusions: Administration of ROTAVAC® at a 0.5 mL dose volume without buffering agent was shown to be well tolerated and immunogenic. Given the homologous nature of the strain, it is plausible that ROTAVAC® replicates well and confers immunity even without buffer administration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6067888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60678882018-08-06 A Phase 4, multicentre, randomized, single-blind clinical trial to evaluate the immunogenicity of the live, attenuated, oral rotavirus vaccine (116E), ROTAVAC®, administered simultaneously with or without the buffering agent in healthy infants in India Ella, Raches Bobba, Radhika Muralidhar, Sanjay Babji, Sudhir Vadrevu, Krishna Mohan Bhan, Maharaj Kishan Hum Vaccin Immunother Research Papers Background: The World Health Organization recommends that rotavirus vaccines should be included in all national immunization programs. Some currently licensed oral rotavirus vaccines contain a buffering agent (either as part of a ready-to-use liquid formulation or added during reconstitution) to reduce possible degradation of the vaccine virus in the infant gut, which poses several programmatic challenges (the large dose volume or the reconstitution requirement) during vaccine administration. Because ROTAVAC®, a WHO prequalified vaccine, was derived from the 116E neonatal strain, we evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of ROTAVAC® without buffer and ROTAVAC® with buffer in a phase 4, multicentre, single-blind, randomized clinical trial in healthy infants in India. Methods: 900 infants, approximately 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age, were assigned to 3 groups to receive ROTAVAC® (0.5 mL dose) orally: (i) 2.5 mL of citrate-bicarbonate buffer 5 minutes prior to administration of ROTAVAC® (Group I), (ii) ROTAVAC®, alone, without any buffer (Group II), or (iii) ROTAVAC®, mixed with buffer immediately before administration (Group III). Non–inferiority was compared among the groups for differences in serological responses (detected by serum anti-rotavirus IgA) and safety. Results: Geometric mean titers post vaccination at day 84 (28 days after dose 3) were 19.6 (95%CI: 17.0, 22.7), 20.7 (95%CI: 17.9, 24) and 19.2 (95%CI: 16.8, 22.1) for groups I, II and III respectively. Further, seroconversion rates and distribution of adverse events were similar among groups. Conclusions: Administration of ROTAVAC® at a 0.5 mL dose volume without buffering agent was shown to be well tolerated and immunogenic. Given the homologous nature of the strain, it is plausible that ROTAVAC® replicates well and confers immunity even without buffer administration. Taylor & Francis 2018-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6067888/ /pubmed/29543547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2018.1450709 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Ella, Raches
Bobba, Radhika
Muralidhar, Sanjay
Babji, Sudhir
Vadrevu, Krishna Mohan
Bhan, Maharaj Kishan
A Phase 4, multicentre, randomized, single-blind clinical trial to evaluate the immunogenicity of the live, attenuated, oral rotavirus vaccine (116E), ROTAVAC®, administered simultaneously with or without the buffering agent in healthy infants in India
title A Phase 4, multicentre, randomized, single-blind clinical trial to evaluate the immunogenicity of the live, attenuated, oral rotavirus vaccine (116E), ROTAVAC®, administered simultaneously with or without the buffering agent in healthy infants in India
title_full A Phase 4, multicentre, randomized, single-blind clinical trial to evaluate the immunogenicity of the live, attenuated, oral rotavirus vaccine (116E), ROTAVAC®, administered simultaneously with or without the buffering agent in healthy infants in India
title_fullStr A Phase 4, multicentre, randomized, single-blind clinical trial to evaluate the immunogenicity of the live, attenuated, oral rotavirus vaccine (116E), ROTAVAC®, administered simultaneously with or without the buffering agent in healthy infants in India
title_full_unstemmed A Phase 4, multicentre, randomized, single-blind clinical trial to evaluate the immunogenicity of the live, attenuated, oral rotavirus vaccine (116E), ROTAVAC®, administered simultaneously with or without the buffering agent in healthy infants in India
title_short A Phase 4, multicentre, randomized, single-blind clinical trial to evaluate the immunogenicity of the live, attenuated, oral rotavirus vaccine (116E), ROTAVAC®, administered simultaneously with or without the buffering agent in healthy infants in India
title_sort phase 4, multicentre, randomized, single-blind clinical trial to evaluate the immunogenicity of the live, attenuated, oral rotavirus vaccine (116e), rotavac®, administered simultaneously with or without the buffering agent in healthy infants in india
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6067888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29543547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2018.1450709
work_keys_str_mv AT ellaraches aphase4multicentrerandomizedsingleblindclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheimmunogenicityoftheliveattenuatedoralrotavirusvaccine116erotavacadministeredsimultaneouslywithorwithoutthebufferingagentinhealthyinfantsinindia
AT bobbaradhika aphase4multicentrerandomizedsingleblindclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheimmunogenicityoftheliveattenuatedoralrotavirusvaccine116erotavacadministeredsimultaneouslywithorwithoutthebufferingagentinhealthyinfantsinindia
AT muralidharsanjay aphase4multicentrerandomizedsingleblindclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheimmunogenicityoftheliveattenuatedoralrotavirusvaccine116erotavacadministeredsimultaneouslywithorwithoutthebufferingagentinhealthyinfantsinindia
AT babjisudhir aphase4multicentrerandomizedsingleblindclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheimmunogenicityoftheliveattenuatedoralrotavirusvaccine116erotavacadministeredsimultaneouslywithorwithoutthebufferingagentinhealthyinfantsinindia
AT vadrevukrishnamohan aphase4multicentrerandomizedsingleblindclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheimmunogenicityoftheliveattenuatedoralrotavirusvaccine116erotavacadministeredsimultaneouslywithorwithoutthebufferingagentinhealthyinfantsinindia
AT bhanmaharajkishan aphase4multicentrerandomizedsingleblindclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheimmunogenicityoftheliveattenuatedoralrotavirusvaccine116erotavacadministeredsimultaneouslywithorwithoutthebufferingagentinhealthyinfantsinindia
AT ellaraches phase4multicentrerandomizedsingleblindclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheimmunogenicityoftheliveattenuatedoralrotavirusvaccine116erotavacadministeredsimultaneouslywithorwithoutthebufferingagentinhealthyinfantsinindia
AT bobbaradhika phase4multicentrerandomizedsingleblindclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheimmunogenicityoftheliveattenuatedoralrotavirusvaccine116erotavacadministeredsimultaneouslywithorwithoutthebufferingagentinhealthyinfantsinindia
AT muralidharsanjay phase4multicentrerandomizedsingleblindclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheimmunogenicityoftheliveattenuatedoralrotavirusvaccine116erotavacadministeredsimultaneouslywithorwithoutthebufferingagentinhealthyinfantsinindia
AT babjisudhir phase4multicentrerandomizedsingleblindclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheimmunogenicityoftheliveattenuatedoralrotavirusvaccine116erotavacadministeredsimultaneouslywithorwithoutthebufferingagentinhealthyinfantsinindia
AT vadrevukrishnamohan phase4multicentrerandomizedsingleblindclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheimmunogenicityoftheliveattenuatedoralrotavirusvaccine116erotavacadministeredsimultaneouslywithorwithoutthebufferingagentinhealthyinfantsinindia
AT bhanmaharajkishan phase4multicentrerandomizedsingleblindclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheimmunogenicityoftheliveattenuatedoralrotavirusvaccine116erotavacadministeredsimultaneouslywithorwithoutthebufferingagentinhealthyinfantsinindia