Cargando…

Allogenic vs. synthetic granules for bone tissue engineering: an in vitro study

The aim of this study was to compare human dental pulp stem cells’ (DPSCs) attachment, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation on allogenic and synthetic biphasic bone granules. In this in vitro study, two types of bone granules were used: allograft [freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA)] and biph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kouhestani, Farnaz, Dehabadi, Farnaz, Hasan Shahriari, Mehrnoosh, Motamedian, Saeed Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6068052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30019188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40204-018-0092-3
_version_ 1783343198683267072
author Kouhestani, Farnaz
Dehabadi, Farnaz
Hasan Shahriari, Mehrnoosh
Motamedian, Saeed Reza
author_facet Kouhestani, Farnaz
Dehabadi, Farnaz
Hasan Shahriari, Mehrnoosh
Motamedian, Saeed Reza
author_sort Kouhestani, Farnaz
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to compare human dental pulp stem cells’ (DPSCs) attachment, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation on allogenic and synthetic biphasic bone granules. In this in vitro study, two types of bone granules were used: allograft [freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA)] and biphasic granules [hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate (HA/β-TCP)]. By isolation of DPSCs, their attachment to bone granules was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) at day 1 and 7 of cultivation. Vital cells were measured by MTT assay at 1, 3, and 7 days of cell culture. Comparison of vital cells at different time points was considered as cell proliferation. Finally, differentiation of DPSCs was evaluated by measurement of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity 3, 7, 14, and 21 days after cell seeding in standard and osteogenic media. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA with a significant level of 0.05. Attachment of DPSCs on FDBA granules seemed relatively stronger. The number of cells (based on MTT values) and ALP activity of the cells cultured on both study groups increased between time points (p ≤ 0.001). FDBA granules had more cells compared to HA/β-TCP granules (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between ALP activity of two study groups cultured in the standard medium (p = 0.347) and they were both higher than the control group (p < 0.05). In the osteogenic medium, FDBA group had significantly higher ALP activity compared to HA/β-TCP (p = 0.035) and control (p = 0.001) groups while there was no significant difference between ALP activity of HA/β-TCP and control groups (p = 0.645). In conclusion, current in vitro study revealed that FDBA granules have more potential in supporting DPSCs attachment and proliferation and inducing their ALP activity compared to HA/β-TCP granules. Therefore, FDBA could serve as a proper bone substitute material.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6068052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60680522018-08-13 Allogenic vs. synthetic granules for bone tissue engineering: an in vitro study Kouhestani, Farnaz Dehabadi, Farnaz Hasan Shahriari, Mehrnoosh Motamedian, Saeed Reza Prog Biomater Original Research The aim of this study was to compare human dental pulp stem cells’ (DPSCs) attachment, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation on allogenic and synthetic biphasic bone granules. In this in vitro study, two types of bone granules were used: allograft [freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA)] and biphasic granules [hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate (HA/β-TCP)]. By isolation of DPSCs, their attachment to bone granules was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) at day 1 and 7 of cultivation. Vital cells were measured by MTT assay at 1, 3, and 7 days of cell culture. Comparison of vital cells at different time points was considered as cell proliferation. Finally, differentiation of DPSCs was evaluated by measurement of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity 3, 7, 14, and 21 days after cell seeding in standard and osteogenic media. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA with a significant level of 0.05. Attachment of DPSCs on FDBA granules seemed relatively stronger. The number of cells (based on MTT values) and ALP activity of the cells cultured on both study groups increased between time points (p ≤ 0.001). FDBA granules had more cells compared to HA/β-TCP granules (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between ALP activity of two study groups cultured in the standard medium (p = 0.347) and they were both higher than the control group (p < 0.05). In the osteogenic medium, FDBA group had significantly higher ALP activity compared to HA/β-TCP (p = 0.035) and control (p = 0.001) groups while there was no significant difference between ALP activity of HA/β-TCP and control groups (p = 0.645). In conclusion, current in vitro study revealed that FDBA granules have more potential in supporting DPSCs attachment and proliferation and inducing their ALP activity compared to HA/β-TCP granules. Therefore, FDBA could serve as a proper bone substitute material. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6068052/ /pubmed/30019188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40204-018-0092-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kouhestani, Farnaz
Dehabadi, Farnaz
Hasan Shahriari, Mehrnoosh
Motamedian, Saeed Reza
Allogenic vs. synthetic granules for bone tissue engineering: an in vitro study
title Allogenic vs. synthetic granules for bone tissue engineering: an in vitro study
title_full Allogenic vs. synthetic granules for bone tissue engineering: an in vitro study
title_fullStr Allogenic vs. synthetic granules for bone tissue engineering: an in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Allogenic vs. synthetic granules for bone tissue engineering: an in vitro study
title_short Allogenic vs. synthetic granules for bone tissue engineering: an in vitro study
title_sort allogenic vs. synthetic granules for bone tissue engineering: an in vitro study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6068052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30019188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40204-018-0092-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kouhestanifarnaz allogenicvssyntheticgranulesforbonetissueengineeringaninvitrostudy
AT dehabadifarnaz allogenicvssyntheticgranulesforbonetissueengineeringaninvitrostudy
AT hasanshahriarimehrnoosh allogenicvssyntheticgranulesforbonetissueengineeringaninvitrostudy
AT motamediansaeedreza allogenicvssyntheticgranulesforbonetissueengineeringaninvitrostudy