Cargando…

Which Side-Bending X-ray Position is Better to Evaluate the Preoperative Curve Flexibility in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients, Supine or Prone?

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PURPOSE: The present study aimed to evaluate the difference in the preoperative curve flexibility between the supine and prone positions in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: In AIS, a side-bending view is necessary to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bekki, Hirofumi, Harimaya, Katsumi, Matsumoto, Yoshihiro, Kawaguchi, Kenichi, Hayashida, Mitsumasa, Okada, Seiji, Doi, Toshio, Nakashima, Yasuharu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6068424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30060370
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.12.4.632
_version_ 1783343267342974976
author Bekki, Hirofumi
Harimaya, Katsumi
Matsumoto, Yoshihiro
Kawaguchi, Kenichi
Hayashida, Mitsumasa
Okada, Seiji
Doi, Toshio
Nakashima, Yasuharu
author_facet Bekki, Hirofumi
Harimaya, Katsumi
Matsumoto, Yoshihiro
Kawaguchi, Kenichi
Hayashida, Mitsumasa
Okada, Seiji
Doi, Toshio
Nakashima, Yasuharu
author_sort Bekki, Hirofumi
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PURPOSE: The present study aimed to evaluate the difference in the preoperative curve flexibility between the supine and prone positions in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: In AIS, a side-bending view is necessary to differentiate a structural curve from a nonstructural curve using the Lenke classification system. However, there are no published studies about which position, supine or prone, is more effective when evaluating preoperative curve flexibility using side-bending X-ray images in AIS patients. METHODS: Radiographs were analyzed for 32 AIS patients (26 females, six males) who underwent posterior correction and fusion of their main thoracic (MT) curves. Cobb angles of MT, proximal thoracic (PT), and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curves were measured preoperatively using upright, supine (anteroposterior and side-bending), and prone (posteroanterior and side-bending) X-rays. RESULTS: The average Cobb angles of PT, MT, and TL/L curves on preoperative upright/supine/prone X-rays were 29.1°/26.7°/26.6°, 60.7°/48.5°/48.2°, and 41.0°/32.6°/33.1°, respectively. The average Cobb angles of PT, MT, and TL/L curves on supine/prone sidebending X-rays were 19.2°/20.3°, 36.3°/36.4°, and 13.9°/15.7°, respectively. The flexibility rates of PT, MT, and TL/L curves in supine/prone positions were 35.3%/32.5%, 40.6%/40.2%, and 71.7%/68.2%, respectively. Comparing flexibility rates in the prone position with those in the supine position in each case, the average ratios of PT, MT, and TL/L curves were found to be 1.0, 1.0, and 0.9, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between supine and prone side-bending X-ray measurements. However, the Lenke classification in six of 32 patients (18.8%) differed between supine and prone positions because the TL/L curve in the supine position was slightly more flexible than in the prone position. CONCLUSIONS: Supine side-bending films may be suitable for the evaluation of preoperative curve flexibility in AIS, especially for lumbar modifier C.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6068424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60684242018-08-08 Which Side-Bending X-ray Position is Better to Evaluate the Preoperative Curve Flexibility in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients, Supine or Prone? Bekki, Hirofumi Harimaya, Katsumi Matsumoto, Yoshihiro Kawaguchi, Kenichi Hayashida, Mitsumasa Okada, Seiji Doi, Toshio Nakashima, Yasuharu Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PURPOSE: The present study aimed to evaluate the difference in the preoperative curve flexibility between the supine and prone positions in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: In AIS, a side-bending view is necessary to differentiate a structural curve from a nonstructural curve using the Lenke classification system. However, there are no published studies about which position, supine or prone, is more effective when evaluating preoperative curve flexibility using side-bending X-ray images in AIS patients. METHODS: Radiographs were analyzed for 32 AIS patients (26 females, six males) who underwent posterior correction and fusion of their main thoracic (MT) curves. Cobb angles of MT, proximal thoracic (PT), and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curves were measured preoperatively using upright, supine (anteroposterior and side-bending), and prone (posteroanterior and side-bending) X-rays. RESULTS: The average Cobb angles of PT, MT, and TL/L curves on preoperative upright/supine/prone X-rays were 29.1°/26.7°/26.6°, 60.7°/48.5°/48.2°, and 41.0°/32.6°/33.1°, respectively. The average Cobb angles of PT, MT, and TL/L curves on supine/prone sidebending X-rays were 19.2°/20.3°, 36.3°/36.4°, and 13.9°/15.7°, respectively. The flexibility rates of PT, MT, and TL/L curves in supine/prone positions were 35.3%/32.5%, 40.6%/40.2%, and 71.7%/68.2%, respectively. Comparing flexibility rates in the prone position with those in the supine position in each case, the average ratios of PT, MT, and TL/L curves were found to be 1.0, 1.0, and 0.9, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between supine and prone side-bending X-ray measurements. However, the Lenke classification in six of 32 patients (18.8%) differed between supine and prone positions because the TL/L curve in the supine position was slightly more flexible than in the prone position. CONCLUSIONS: Supine side-bending films may be suitable for the evaluation of preoperative curve flexibility in AIS, especially for lumbar modifier C. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2018-08 2018-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6068424/ /pubmed/30060370 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.12.4.632 Text en Copyright © 2018 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Bekki, Hirofumi
Harimaya, Katsumi
Matsumoto, Yoshihiro
Kawaguchi, Kenichi
Hayashida, Mitsumasa
Okada, Seiji
Doi, Toshio
Nakashima, Yasuharu
Which Side-Bending X-ray Position is Better to Evaluate the Preoperative Curve Flexibility in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients, Supine or Prone?
title Which Side-Bending X-ray Position is Better to Evaluate the Preoperative Curve Flexibility in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients, Supine or Prone?
title_full Which Side-Bending X-ray Position is Better to Evaluate the Preoperative Curve Flexibility in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients, Supine or Prone?
title_fullStr Which Side-Bending X-ray Position is Better to Evaluate the Preoperative Curve Flexibility in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients, Supine or Prone?
title_full_unstemmed Which Side-Bending X-ray Position is Better to Evaluate the Preoperative Curve Flexibility in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients, Supine or Prone?
title_short Which Side-Bending X-ray Position is Better to Evaluate the Preoperative Curve Flexibility in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients, Supine or Prone?
title_sort which side-bending x-ray position is better to evaluate the preoperative curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients, supine or prone?
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6068424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30060370
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.12.4.632
work_keys_str_mv AT bekkihirofumi whichsidebendingxraypositionisbettertoevaluatethepreoperativecurveflexibilityinadolescentidiopathicscoliosispatientssupineorprone
AT harimayakatsumi whichsidebendingxraypositionisbettertoevaluatethepreoperativecurveflexibilityinadolescentidiopathicscoliosispatientssupineorprone
AT matsumotoyoshihiro whichsidebendingxraypositionisbettertoevaluatethepreoperativecurveflexibilityinadolescentidiopathicscoliosispatientssupineorprone
AT kawaguchikenichi whichsidebendingxraypositionisbettertoevaluatethepreoperativecurveflexibilityinadolescentidiopathicscoliosispatientssupineorprone
AT hayashidamitsumasa whichsidebendingxraypositionisbettertoevaluatethepreoperativecurveflexibilityinadolescentidiopathicscoliosispatientssupineorprone
AT okadaseiji whichsidebendingxraypositionisbettertoevaluatethepreoperativecurveflexibilityinadolescentidiopathicscoliosispatientssupineorprone
AT doitoshio whichsidebendingxraypositionisbettertoevaluatethepreoperativecurveflexibilityinadolescentidiopathicscoliosispatientssupineorprone
AT nakashimayasuharu whichsidebendingxraypositionisbettertoevaluatethepreoperativecurveflexibilityinadolescentidiopathicscoliosispatientssupineorprone