Cargando…
Which Side-Bending X-ray Position is Better to Evaluate the Preoperative Curve Flexibility in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients, Supine or Prone?
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PURPOSE: The present study aimed to evaluate the difference in the preoperative curve flexibility between the supine and prone positions in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: In AIS, a side-bending view is necessary to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6068424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30060370 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.12.4.632 |
_version_ | 1783343267342974976 |
---|---|
author | Bekki, Hirofumi Harimaya, Katsumi Matsumoto, Yoshihiro Kawaguchi, Kenichi Hayashida, Mitsumasa Okada, Seiji Doi, Toshio Nakashima, Yasuharu |
author_facet | Bekki, Hirofumi Harimaya, Katsumi Matsumoto, Yoshihiro Kawaguchi, Kenichi Hayashida, Mitsumasa Okada, Seiji Doi, Toshio Nakashima, Yasuharu |
author_sort | Bekki, Hirofumi |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PURPOSE: The present study aimed to evaluate the difference in the preoperative curve flexibility between the supine and prone positions in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: In AIS, a side-bending view is necessary to differentiate a structural curve from a nonstructural curve using the Lenke classification system. However, there are no published studies about which position, supine or prone, is more effective when evaluating preoperative curve flexibility using side-bending X-ray images in AIS patients. METHODS: Radiographs were analyzed for 32 AIS patients (26 females, six males) who underwent posterior correction and fusion of their main thoracic (MT) curves. Cobb angles of MT, proximal thoracic (PT), and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curves were measured preoperatively using upright, supine (anteroposterior and side-bending), and prone (posteroanterior and side-bending) X-rays. RESULTS: The average Cobb angles of PT, MT, and TL/L curves on preoperative upright/supine/prone X-rays were 29.1°/26.7°/26.6°, 60.7°/48.5°/48.2°, and 41.0°/32.6°/33.1°, respectively. The average Cobb angles of PT, MT, and TL/L curves on supine/prone sidebending X-rays were 19.2°/20.3°, 36.3°/36.4°, and 13.9°/15.7°, respectively. The flexibility rates of PT, MT, and TL/L curves in supine/prone positions were 35.3%/32.5%, 40.6%/40.2%, and 71.7%/68.2%, respectively. Comparing flexibility rates in the prone position with those in the supine position in each case, the average ratios of PT, MT, and TL/L curves were found to be 1.0, 1.0, and 0.9, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between supine and prone side-bending X-ray measurements. However, the Lenke classification in six of 32 patients (18.8%) differed between supine and prone positions because the TL/L curve in the supine position was slightly more flexible than in the prone position. CONCLUSIONS: Supine side-bending films may be suitable for the evaluation of preoperative curve flexibility in AIS, especially for lumbar modifier C. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6068424 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Korean Society of Spine Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60684242018-08-08 Which Side-Bending X-ray Position is Better to Evaluate the Preoperative Curve Flexibility in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients, Supine or Prone? Bekki, Hirofumi Harimaya, Katsumi Matsumoto, Yoshihiro Kawaguchi, Kenichi Hayashida, Mitsumasa Okada, Seiji Doi, Toshio Nakashima, Yasuharu Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PURPOSE: The present study aimed to evaluate the difference in the preoperative curve flexibility between the supine and prone positions in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: In AIS, a side-bending view is necessary to differentiate a structural curve from a nonstructural curve using the Lenke classification system. However, there are no published studies about which position, supine or prone, is more effective when evaluating preoperative curve flexibility using side-bending X-ray images in AIS patients. METHODS: Radiographs were analyzed for 32 AIS patients (26 females, six males) who underwent posterior correction and fusion of their main thoracic (MT) curves. Cobb angles of MT, proximal thoracic (PT), and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curves were measured preoperatively using upright, supine (anteroposterior and side-bending), and prone (posteroanterior and side-bending) X-rays. RESULTS: The average Cobb angles of PT, MT, and TL/L curves on preoperative upright/supine/prone X-rays were 29.1°/26.7°/26.6°, 60.7°/48.5°/48.2°, and 41.0°/32.6°/33.1°, respectively. The average Cobb angles of PT, MT, and TL/L curves on supine/prone sidebending X-rays were 19.2°/20.3°, 36.3°/36.4°, and 13.9°/15.7°, respectively. The flexibility rates of PT, MT, and TL/L curves in supine/prone positions were 35.3%/32.5%, 40.6%/40.2%, and 71.7%/68.2%, respectively. Comparing flexibility rates in the prone position with those in the supine position in each case, the average ratios of PT, MT, and TL/L curves were found to be 1.0, 1.0, and 0.9, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between supine and prone side-bending X-ray measurements. However, the Lenke classification in six of 32 patients (18.8%) differed between supine and prone positions because the TL/L curve in the supine position was slightly more flexible than in the prone position. CONCLUSIONS: Supine side-bending films may be suitable for the evaluation of preoperative curve flexibility in AIS, especially for lumbar modifier C. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2018-08 2018-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6068424/ /pubmed/30060370 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.12.4.632 Text en Copyright © 2018 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Bekki, Hirofumi Harimaya, Katsumi Matsumoto, Yoshihiro Kawaguchi, Kenichi Hayashida, Mitsumasa Okada, Seiji Doi, Toshio Nakashima, Yasuharu Which Side-Bending X-ray Position is Better to Evaluate the Preoperative Curve Flexibility in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients, Supine or Prone? |
title | Which Side-Bending X-ray Position is Better to Evaluate the Preoperative Curve Flexibility in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients, Supine or Prone? |
title_full | Which Side-Bending X-ray Position is Better to Evaluate the Preoperative Curve Flexibility in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients, Supine or Prone? |
title_fullStr | Which Side-Bending X-ray Position is Better to Evaluate the Preoperative Curve Flexibility in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients, Supine or Prone? |
title_full_unstemmed | Which Side-Bending X-ray Position is Better to Evaluate the Preoperative Curve Flexibility in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients, Supine or Prone? |
title_short | Which Side-Bending X-ray Position is Better to Evaluate the Preoperative Curve Flexibility in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients, Supine or Prone? |
title_sort | which side-bending x-ray position is better to evaluate the preoperative curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients, supine or prone? |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6068424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30060370 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.12.4.632 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bekkihirofumi whichsidebendingxraypositionisbettertoevaluatethepreoperativecurveflexibilityinadolescentidiopathicscoliosispatientssupineorprone AT harimayakatsumi whichsidebendingxraypositionisbettertoevaluatethepreoperativecurveflexibilityinadolescentidiopathicscoliosispatientssupineorprone AT matsumotoyoshihiro whichsidebendingxraypositionisbettertoevaluatethepreoperativecurveflexibilityinadolescentidiopathicscoliosispatientssupineorprone AT kawaguchikenichi whichsidebendingxraypositionisbettertoevaluatethepreoperativecurveflexibilityinadolescentidiopathicscoliosispatientssupineorprone AT hayashidamitsumasa whichsidebendingxraypositionisbettertoevaluatethepreoperativecurveflexibilityinadolescentidiopathicscoliosispatientssupineorprone AT okadaseiji whichsidebendingxraypositionisbettertoevaluatethepreoperativecurveflexibilityinadolescentidiopathicscoliosispatientssupineorprone AT doitoshio whichsidebendingxraypositionisbettertoevaluatethepreoperativecurveflexibilityinadolescentidiopathicscoliosispatientssupineorprone AT nakashimayasuharu whichsidebendingxraypositionisbettertoevaluatethepreoperativecurveflexibilityinadolescentidiopathicscoliosispatientssupineorprone |