Cargando…

Would you be willing to zap your child's brain? Public perspectives on parental responsibilities and the ethics of enhancing children with transcranial direct current stimulation

Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an experimental brain stimulation technology that may one day be used to enhance the cognitive capacities of children. Discussion about the ethical issues that this would raise has rarely moved beyond expert circles. However, the opinions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagner, Katy, Maslen, Hannah, Oakley, Justin, Savulescu, Julian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6068541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29338674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2018.1424268
_version_ 1783343292719562752
author Wagner, Katy
Maslen, Hannah
Oakley, Justin
Savulescu, Julian
author_facet Wagner, Katy
Maslen, Hannah
Oakley, Justin
Savulescu, Julian
author_sort Wagner, Katy
collection PubMed
description Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an experimental brain stimulation technology that may one day be used to enhance the cognitive capacities of children. Discussion about the ethical issues that this would raise has rarely moved beyond expert circles. However, the opinions of the wider public can lead to more democratic policy decisions and broaden academic discussion of this issue. Methods: We performed a quantitative survey of members of the U.S. public. A between-subjects design was employed, where conditions varied based on the trait respondents considered for enhancement. Results: There were 227 responses included for analysis. Our key finding was that the majority were unwilling to enhance their child with tDCS. Respondents were most reluctant to enhance traits considered fundamental to the self (such as motivation and empathy). However, many respondents may give in to implicit coercion to enhance their child in spite of an initial reluctance. A ban on tDCS was not supported if it were to be used safely for the enhancement of mood or mathematical ability. Opposition to such a ban may be related to the belief that tDCS use would not represent cheating or violate authenticity (as it relates to achievements rather than identity). Conclusions: The wider public appears to think that crossing the line from treatment to enhancement with tDCS would not be in a child's best interests. However, an important alternative interpretation of our results is that lay people may be willing to use enhancers that matched their preference for “natural” enhancers. A ban on the safe use of tDCS for enhancing nonfundamental traits would be unlikely to garner public support. Nonetheless, it could become important to regulate tDCS in order to prevent misuse on children, because individuals reluctant to enhance may be likely to give in to implicit coercion to enhance their child.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6068541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60685412018-08-09 Would you be willing to zap your child's brain? Public perspectives on parental responsibilities and the ethics of enhancing children with transcranial direct current stimulation Wagner, Katy Maslen, Hannah Oakley, Justin Savulescu, Julian AJOB Empir Bioeth Articles Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an experimental brain stimulation technology that may one day be used to enhance the cognitive capacities of children. Discussion about the ethical issues that this would raise has rarely moved beyond expert circles. However, the opinions of the wider public can lead to more democratic policy decisions and broaden academic discussion of this issue. Methods: We performed a quantitative survey of members of the U.S. public. A between-subjects design was employed, where conditions varied based on the trait respondents considered for enhancement. Results: There were 227 responses included for analysis. Our key finding was that the majority were unwilling to enhance their child with tDCS. Respondents were most reluctant to enhance traits considered fundamental to the self (such as motivation and empathy). However, many respondents may give in to implicit coercion to enhance their child in spite of an initial reluctance. A ban on tDCS was not supported if it were to be used safely for the enhancement of mood or mathematical ability. Opposition to such a ban may be related to the belief that tDCS use would not represent cheating or violate authenticity (as it relates to achievements rather than identity). Conclusions: The wider public appears to think that crossing the line from treatment to enhancement with tDCS would not be in a child's best interests. However, an important alternative interpretation of our results is that lay people may be willing to use enhancers that matched their preference for “natural” enhancers. A ban on the safe use of tDCS for enhancing nonfundamental traits would be unlikely to garner public support. Nonetheless, it could become important to regulate tDCS in order to prevent misuse on children, because individuals reluctant to enhance may be likely to give in to implicit coercion to enhance their child. Taylor & Francis 2018-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6068541/ /pubmed/29338674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2018.1424268 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC. http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided use, the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Wagner, Katy
Maslen, Hannah
Oakley, Justin
Savulescu, Julian
Would you be willing to zap your child's brain? Public perspectives on parental responsibilities and the ethics of enhancing children with transcranial direct current stimulation
title Would you be willing to zap your child's brain? Public perspectives on parental responsibilities and the ethics of enhancing children with transcranial direct current stimulation
title_full Would you be willing to zap your child's brain? Public perspectives on parental responsibilities and the ethics of enhancing children with transcranial direct current stimulation
title_fullStr Would you be willing to zap your child's brain? Public perspectives on parental responsibilities and the ethics of enhancing children with transcranial direct current stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Would you be willing to zap your child's brain? Public perspectives on parental responsibilities and the ethics of enhancing children with transcranial direct current stimulation
title_short Would you be willing to zap your child's brain? Public perspectives on parental responsibilities and the ethics of enhancing children with transcranial direct current stimulation
title_sort would you be willing to zap your child's brain? public perspectives on parental responsibilities and the ethics of enhancing children with transcranial direct current stimulation
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6068541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29338674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2018.1424268
work_keys_str_mv AT wagnerkaty wouldyoubewillingtozapyourchildsbrainpublicperspectivesonparentalresponsibilitiesandtheethicsofenhancingchildrenwithtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulation
AT maslenhannah wouldyoubewillingtozapyourchildsbrainpublicperspectivesonparentalresponsibilitiesandtheethicsofenhancingchildrenwithtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulation
AT oakleyjustin wouldyoubewillingtozapyourchildsbrainpublicperspectivesonparentalresponsibilitiesandtheethicsofenhancingchildrenwithtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulation
AT savulescujulian wouldyoubewillingtozapyourchildsbrainpublicperspectivesonparentalresponsibilitiesandtheethicsofenhancingchildrenwithtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulation