Cargando…

A Comparative Study of Modern Homology Modeling Algorithms for Rhodopsin Structure Prediction

[Image: see text] Rhodopsins are seven α-helical membrane proteins that are of great importance in chemistry, biology, and modern biotechnology. Any in silico study on rhodopsin properties and functioning requires a high-quality three-dimensional structure. Due to particular difficulties with obtain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nikolaev, Dmitrii M., Shtyrov, Andrey A., Panov, Maxim S., Jamal, Adeel, Chakchir, Oleg B., Kochemirovsky, Vladimir A., Olivucci, Massimo, Ryazantsev, Mikhail N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6068592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b00721
_version_ 1783343304610414592
author Nikolaev, Dmitrii M.
Shtyrov, Andrey A.
Panov, Maxim S.
Jamal, Adeel
Chakchir, Oleg B.
Kochemirovsky, Vladimir A.
Olivucci, Massimo
Ryazantsev, Mikhail N.
author_facet Nikolaev, Dmitrii M.
Shtyrov, Andrey A.
Panov, Maxim S.
Jamal, Adeel
Chakchir, Oleg B.
Kochemirovsky, Vladimir A.
Olivucci, Massimo
Ryazantsev, Mikhail N.
author_sort Nikolaev, Dmitrii M.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Rhodopsins are seven α-helical membrane proteins that are of great importance in chemistry, biology, and modern biotechnology. Any in silico study on rhodopsin properties and functioning requires a high-quality three-dimensional structure. Due to particular difficulties with obtaining membrane protein structures from the experiment, in silico prediction of the three-dimensional rhodopsin structure based only on its primary sequence is an especially important task. For the last few years, significant progress was made in the field of protein structure prediction, especially for methods based on comparative modeling. However, the majority of this progress was made for soluble proteins and further investigations are needed to achieve similar progress for membrane proteins. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of modern protein structure prediction methodologies (implemented in the Medeller, I-TASSER, and Rosetta packages) for their ability to predict rhodopsin structures. Three widely used methodologies were considered: two general methodologies that are commonly applied to soluble proteins and a methodology that uses constraints that are specific for membrane proteins. The test pool consisted of 36 target-template pairs with different sequence similarities that was constructed on the basis of 24 experimental rhodopsin structures taken from the RCSB database. As a result, we showed that all three considered methodologies allow obtaining rhodopsin structures with the quality that is close to the crystallographic one (root mean square deviation (RMSD) of the predicted structure from the corresponding X-ray structure up to 1.5 Å) if the target-template sequence identity is higher than 40%. Moreover, all considered methodologies provided structures of average quality (RMSD < 4.0 Å) if the target-template sequence identity is higher than 20%. Such structures can be subsequently used for further investigation of molecular mechanisms of protein functioning and for the development of modern protein-based biotechnologies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6068592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60685922018-08-05 A Comparative Study of Modern Homology Modeling Algorithms for Rhodopsin Structure Prediction Nikolaev, Dmitrii M. Shtyrov, Andrey A. Panov, Maxim S. Jamal, Adeel Chakchir, Oleg B. Kochemirovsky, Vladimir A. Olivucci, Massimo Ryazantsev, Mikhail N. ACS Omega [Image: see text] Rhodopsins are seven α-helical membrane proteins that are of great importance in chemistry, biology, and modern biotechnology. Any in silico study on rhodopsin properties and functioning requires a high-quality three-dimensional structure. Due to particular difficulties with obtaining membrane protein structures from the experiment, in silico prediction of the three-dimensional rhodopsin structure based only on its primary sequence is an especially important task. For the last few years, significant progress was made in the field of protein structure prediction, especially for methods based on comparative modeling. However, the majority of this progress was made for soluble proteins and further investigations are needed to achieve similar progress for membrane proteins. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of modern protein structure prediction methodologies (implemented in the Medeller, I-TASSER, and Rosetta packages) for their ability to predict rhodopsin structures. Three widely used methodologies were considered: two general methodologies that are commonly applied to soluble proteins and a methodology that uses constraints that are specific for membrane proteins. The test pool consisted of 36 target-template pairs with different sequence similarities that was constructed on the basis of 24 experimental rhodopsin structures taken from the RCSB database. As a result, we showed that all three considered methodologies allow obtaining rhodopsin structures with the quality that is close to the crystallographic one (root mean square deviation (RMSD) of the predicted structure from the corresponding X-ray structure up to 1.5 Å) if the target-template sequence identity is higher than 40%. Moreover, all considered methodologies provided structures of average quality (RMSD < 4.0 Å) if the target-template sequence identity is higher than 20%. Such structures can be subsequently used for further investigation of molecular mechanisms of protein functioning and for the development of modern protein-based biotechnologies. American Chemical Society 2018-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6068592/ /pubmed/30087916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b00721 Text en Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Nikolaev, Dmitrii M.
Shtyrov, Andrey A.
Panov, Maxim S.
Jamal, Adeel
Chakchir, Oleg B.
Kochemirovsky, Vladimir A.
Olivucci, Massimo
Ryazantsev, Mikhail N.
A Comparative Study of Modern Homology Modeling Algorithms for Rhodopsin Structure Prediction
title A Comparative Study of Modern Homology Modeling Algorithms for Rhodopsin Structure Prediction
title_full A Comparative Study of Modern Homology Modeling Algorithms for Rhodopsin Structure Prediction
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Modern Homology Modeling Algorithms for Rhodopsin Structure Prediction
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Modern Homology Modeling Algorithms for Rhodopsin Structure Prediction
title_short A Comparative Study of Modern Homology Modeling Algorithms for Rhodopsin Structure Prediction
title_sort comparative study of modern homology modeling algorithms for rhodopsin structure prediction
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6068592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b00721
work_keys_str_mv AT nikolaevdmitriim acomparativestudyofmodernhomologymodelingalgorithmsforrhodopsinstructureprediction
AT shtyrovandreya acomparativestudyofmodernhomologymodelingalgorithmsforrhodopsinstructureprediction
AT panovmaxims acomparativestudyofmodernhomologymodelingalgorithmsforrhodopsinstructureprediction
AT jamaladeel acomparativestudyofmodernhomologymodelingalgorithmsforrhodopsinstructureprediction
AT chakchirolegb acomparativestudyofmodernhomologymodelingalgorithmsforrhodopsinstructureprediction
AT kochemirovskyvladimira acomparativestudyofmodernhomologymodelingalgorithmsforrhodopsinstructureprediction
AT olivuccimassimo acomparativestudyofmodernhomologymodelingalgorithmsforrhodopsinstructureprediction
AT ryazantsevmikhailn acomparativestudyofmodernhomologymodelingalgorithmsforrhodopsinstructureprediction
AT nikolaevdmitriim comparativestudyofmodernhomologymodelingalgorithmsforrhodopsinstructureprediction
AT shtyrovandreya comparativestudyofmodernhomologymodelingalgorithmsforrhodopsinstructureprediction
AT panovmaxims comparativestudyofmodernhomologymodelingalgorithmsforrhodopsinstructureprediction
AT jamaladeel comparativestudyofmodernhomologymodelingalgorithmsforrhodopsinstructureprediction
AT chakchirolegb comparativestudyofmodernhomologymodelingalgorithmsforrhodopsinstructureprediction
AT kochemirovskyvladimira comparativestudyofmodernhomologymodelingalgorithmsforrhodopsinstructureprediction
AT olivuccimassimo comparativestudyofmodernhomologymodelingalgorithmsforrhodopsinstructureprediction
AT ryazantsevmikhailn comparativestudyofmodernhomologymodelingalgorithmsforrhodopsinstructureprediction