Cargando…

Discrepancy between Self-Reported and Urine Cotinine-Verified Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure among Rural Pregnant Women in China

Prenatal exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is the most modifiable risk factor associated with adverse child-health outcomes. However, few longitudinal studies are implemented to compare the rates of discrepancy between self-reported (SR) and urinary cotinine (UC)-verified ETS exposure du...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiao, Xia, Li, Yan, Song, Xiaoxiao, Xu, Qinghua, Yang, Siwei, Wu, Jie, Seto, Edmund
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6068804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30012986
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071499
_version_ 1783343350086107136
author Xiao, Xia
Li, Yan
Song, Xiaoxiao
Xu, Qinghua
Yang, Siwei
Wu, Jie
Seto, Edmund
author_facet Xiao, Xia
Li, Yan
Song, Xiaoxiao
Xu, Qinghua
Yang, Siwei
Wu, Jie
Seto, Edmund
author_sort Xiao, Xia
collection PubMed
description Prenatal exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is the most modifiable risk factor associated with adverse child-health outcomes. However, few longitudinal studies are implemented to compare the rates of discrepancy between self-reported (SR) and urinary cotinine (UC)-verified ETS exposure during the three trimesters of pregnancy, especially in rural areas. The objectives of this study were to assess the discrepancy between SR and UC-verified ETS exposure among rural women employing three measures throughout pregnancy, and to explore predictors related to these differences. This study used a prospective prenatal cohort consisting of 420 pregnant women whose ETS exposure was entirely evaluated by both SR and UC verification across three trimesters of pregnancy. Environmental tobacco exposure was assessed via SR verification, and was validated using the limit of detection for UC. The discrepancy rates were determined for each trimester. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the predictors associated with these differences. The discrepancy rates between SR and UC verification were 25.2%, 17.1%, and 20.5% (first, second, and third trimester, respectively). The highest inconsistency occurred in the first trimester. After adjusting for confounding factors, the following variables were found to have statistically significant associations with the discrepancy rate between SR and UC-verified ETS exposure: the number of smokers in the family and household income for all three trimesters, township site for the second and third trimester, and gravidity for the last trimester. The SR rate of ETS exposure among rural pregnant women is underreported, while the UC-verified rate is higher. More smokers in the family and gravidity may increase the risk of ETS exposure for pregnant women. Biochemical validation is warranted throughout pregnancy for the adoption of home-smoking bans and the promotion of community-based smoke-free programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6068804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60688042018-08-07 Discrepancy between Self-Reported and Urine Cotinine-Verified Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure among Rural Pregnant Women in China Xiao, Xia Li, Yan Song, Xiaoxiao Xu, Qinghua Yang, Siwei Wu, Jie Seto, Edmund Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Prenatal exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is the most modifiable risk factor associated with adverse child-health outcomes. However, few longitudinal studies are implemented to compare the rates of discrepancy between self-reported (SR) and urinary cotinine (UC)-verified ETS exposure during the three trimesters of pregnancy, especially in rural areas. The objectives of this study were to assess the discrepancy between SR and UC-verified ETS exposure among rural women employing three measures throughout pregnancy, and to explore predictors related to these differences. This study used a prospective prenatal cohort consisting of 420 pregnant women whose ETS exposure was entirely evaluated by both SR and UC verification across three trimesters of pregnancy. Environmental tobacco exposure was assessed via SR verification, and was validated using the limit of detection for UC. The discrepancy rates were determined for each trimester. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the predictors associated with these differences. The discrepancy rates between SR and UC verification were 25.2%, 17.1%, and 20.5% (first, second, and third trimester, respectively). The highest inconsistency occurred in the first trimester. After adjusting for confounding factors, the following variables were found to have statistically significant associations with the discrepancy rate between SR and UC-verified ETS exposure: the number of smokers in the family and household income for all three trimesters, township site for the second and third trimester, and gravidity for the last trimester. The SR rate of ETS exposure among rural pregnant women is underreported, while the UC-verified rate is higher. More smokers in the family and gravidity may increase the risk of ETS exposure for pregnant women. Biochemical validation is warranted throughout pregnancy for the adoption of home-smoking bans and the promotion of community-based smoke-free programs. MDPI 2018-07-16 2018-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6068804/ /pubmed/30012986 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071499 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Xiao, Xia
Li, Yan
Song, Xiaoxiao
Xu, Qinghua
Yang, Siwei
Wu, Jie
Seto, Edmund
Discrepancy between Self-Reported and Urine Cotinine-Verified Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure among Rural Pregnant Women in China
title Discrepancy between Self-Reported and Urine Cotinine-Verified Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure among Rural Pregnant Women in China
title_full Discrepancy between Self-Reported and Urine Cotinine-Verified Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure among Rural Pregnant Women in China
title_fullStr Discrepancy between Self-Reported and Urine Cotinine-Verified Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure among Rural Pregnant Women in China
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancy between Self-Reported and Urine Cotinine-Verified Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure among Rural Pregnant Women in China
title_short Discrepancy between Self-Reported and Urine Cotinine-Verified Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure among Rural Pregnant Women in China
title_sort discrepancy between self-reported and urine cotinine-verified environmental tobacco smoke exposure among rural pregnant women in china
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6068804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30012986
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071499
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoxia discrepancybetweenselfreportedandurinecotinineverifiedenvironmentaltobaccosmokeexposureamongruralpregnantwomeninchina
AT liyan discrepancybetweenselfreportedandurinecotinineverifiedenvironmentaltobaccosmokeexposureamongruralpregnantwomeninchina
AT songxiaoxiao discrepancybetweenselfreportedandurinecotinineverifiedenvironmentaltobaccosmokeexposureamongruralpregnantwomeninchina
AT xuqinghua discrepancybetweenselfreportedandurinecotinineverifiedenvironmentaltobaccosmokeexposureamongruralpregnantwomeninchina
AT yangsiwei discrepancybetweenselfreportedandurinecotinineverifiedenvironmentaltobaccosmokeexposureamongruralpregnantwomeninchina
AT wujie discrepancybetweenselfreportedandurinecotinineverifiedenvironmentaltobaccosmokeexposureamongruralpregnantwomeninchina
AT setoedmund discrepancybetweenselfreportedandurinecotinineverifiedenvironmentaltobaccosmokeexposureamongruralpregnantwomeninchina